Behavioral reactivity to ecological momentary assessment of alcohol and sexual assault protective behavioral strategies.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-20 DOI:10.1037/pha0000807
Elena Kalina, Michael A Russell, G C Rodríguez, Robert F Leeman, Nichole M Scaglione
{"title":"Behavioral reactivity to ecological momentary assessment of alcohol and sexual assault protective behavioral strategies.","authors":"Elena Kalina, Michael A Russell, G C Rodríguez, Robert F Leeman, Nichole M Scaglione","doi":"10.1037/pha0000807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to examine risk and protective factors associated with alcohol-involved sexual assault (SA). Whereas extant literature demonstrates limited reactivity (i.e., systematic behavior change) to repeated assessment of risk behaviors (e.g., drinking), we know little about the impact of EMA on protective behaviors (i.e., harm reduction strategies). The present study examined between- and within-person reactivity to EMA participation using data from a larger study of alcohol and SA protective behavioral strategy (PBS) use. First-year college women (<i>N</i> = 138) were randomized to a 14-day EMA or a reactivity control condition. Both conditions completed baseline/follow-up measures of drinking behavior, alcohol PBS, and SA PBS. The EMA condition reported alcohol and SA PBS use each morning after drinking. We used 2 × 2 analyses of variance to examine differences in PBS use by condition (EMA vs. control) over time (baseline vs. follow-up); within-person changes in PBS use were probed with multilevel models. We found Significant Condition × Time interactions for both alcohol PBS and SA PBS; the EMA condition increased PBS use relative to the control condition across the first semester of college. Across the 14-day EMA protocol, women marginally increased alcohol PBS use and significantly increased SA PBS use. Participation in a 14-day EMA protocol may lead to changes in PBS use among first-semester college women. Results encourage examination of and controlling for potential reactivity in etiology and intervention studies of PBS use and highlight the potential of momentary interventions to increase PBS use over time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"233-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12593412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to examine risk and protective factors associated with alcohol-involved sexual assault (SA). Whereas extant literature demonstrates limited reactivity (i.e., systematic behavior change) to repeated assessment of risk behaviors (e.g., drinking), we know little about the impact of EMA on protective behaviors (i.e., harm reduction strategies). The present study examined between- and within-person reactivity to EMA participation using data from a larger study of alcohol and SA protective behavioral strategy (PBS) use. First-year college women (N = 138) were randomized to a 14-day EMA or a reactivity control condition. Both conditions completed baseline/follow-up measures of drinking behavior, alcohol PBS, and SA PBS. The EMA condition reported alcohol and SA PBS use each morning after drinking. We used 2 × 2 analyses of variance to examine differences in PBS use by condition (EMA vs. control) over time (baseline vs. follow-up); within-person changes in PBS use were probed with multilevel models. We found Significant Condition × Time interactions for both alcohol PBS and SA PBS; the EMA condition increased PBS use relative to the control condition across the first semester of college. Across the 14-day EMA protocol, women marginally increased alcohol PBS use and significantly increased SA PBS use. Participation in a 14-day EMA protocol may lead to changes in PBS use among first-semester college women. Results encourage examination of and controlling for potential reactivity in etiology and intervention studies of PBS use and highlight the potential of momentary interventions to increase PBS use over time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

行为反应对酒精和性侵犯保护行为策略的生态瞬时评估。
生态瞬时评估(EMA)越来越多地用于检查与酒精性侵犯(SA)相关的风险和保护因素。尽管现有文献表明,对重复评估风险行为(如饮酒)的反应性有限(即系统的行为改变),但我们对EMA对保护行为(即减少伤害策略)的影响知之甚少。本研究使用来自酒精和SA保护行为策略(PBS)使用的更大研究的数据,检查了参与EMA的人与人之间的反应性。大学一年级女生(N = 138)被随机分为14天EMA组和反应性对照组。两种情况都完成了饮酒行为、酒精PBS和SA PBS的基线/随访测量。EMA报告了每天早上饮酒后的酒精和SA PBS使用情况。我们使用2 × 2方差分析来检查不同病情(EMA与对照组)随时间(基线与随访)PBS使用的差异;用多层次模型探讨了PBS使用的个人内部变化。我们发现酒精PBS和SA PBS都有显著的条件×时间相互作用;在大学第一学期,与对照组相比,EMA条件增加了PBS的使用。在14天的EMA方案中,女性略微增加了酒精PBS的使用,显著增加了SA PBS的使用。参加为期14天的EMA方案可能会导致大学一学期女性使用PBS的变化。结果鼓励在PBS使用的病因学和干预研究中检查和控制潜在的反应性,并强调瞬间干预随着时间的推移增加PBS使用的潜力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书