Nationwide external quality assessment of serum glycated albumin measurement in China during 2024-2025: current situation, challenges and prospects.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Hao Zheng, Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Chao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Jiangtao Zhang, Jing Wang, Chuanbao Zhang, Tianjiao Zhang
{"title":"Nationwide external quality assessment of serum glycated albumin measurement in China during 2024-2025: current situation, challenges and prospects.","authors":"Hao Zheng, Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Chao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Jiangtao Zhang, Jing Wang, Chuanbao Zhang, Tianjiao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glycated albumin (GA) serves an important alternative biomarker of glycemia, playing a key role in diabetes diagnosis. Given that the harmonization status of GA assays in China remains unclear, implementing external quality assessment (EQA) program is essential to evaluate their analytical performance. This will provide reliable information to support patient diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Center of Clinical Laboratories (NCCL, Beijing, China) organized a biannual EQA scheme for GA. EQA samples were distributed to the participants, who were required to measure five samples per cycle and submit their results along with detailed information on reagents, methodologies, and instruments used. Following each cycle, NCCL edited comprehensive reports summarizing individual laboratory performance and scores, including an overview of all participants' results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2024 and 2025, 93.3 % and 95.7 % of participants achieved satisfactory annual performance, respectively. GA measurements demonstrated high precision within manufacturers, with median intra-manufacturer robust coefficient of variation (CV) below 3.1 %. However, notable disparities emerged across manufacturers: the median inter-manufacturer robust CV was 6.5 %, the median relative deviation from target values reached up to 9.3 %, and maximum deviation was as high as 40 %. Analysis based on laboratory performance showed a steady improvement trend from 2024 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nationwide GA EQA program scheme has substantially improved analytical performance and cultivated a robust quality assurance culture across participating laboratories. Persistent challenges to further elevating detection quality through EQA include sample commutability, procedure for target value assignment, and replicate samples. Moving forward, fostering collaborative engagement among all stakeholders are essential to overcome these limitations and establish a harmonized framework for GA detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":" ","pages":"120673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glycated albumin (GA) serves an important alternative biomarker of glycemia, playing a key role in diabetes diagnosis. Given that the harmonization status of GA assays in China remains unclear, implementing external quality assessment (EQA) program is essential to evaluate their analytical performance. This will provide reliable information to support patient diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: The National Center of Clinical Laboratories (NCCL, Beijing, China) organized a biannual EQA scheme for GA. EQA samples were distributed to the participants, who were required to measure five samples per cycle and submit their results along with detailed information on reagents, methodologies, and instruments used. Following each cycle, NCCL edited comprehensive reports summarizing individual laboratory performance and scores, including an overview of all participants' results.

Results: In 2024 and 2025, 93.3 % and 95.7 % of participants achieved satisfactory annual performance, respectively. GA measurements demonstrated high precision within manufacturers, with median intra-manufacturer robust coefficient of variation (CV) below 3.1 %. However, notable disparities emerged across manufacturers: the median inter-manufacturer robust CV was 6.5 %, the median relative deviation from target values reached up to 9.3 %, and maximum deviation was as high as 40 %. Analysis based on laboratory performance showed a steady improvement trend from 2024 to 2025.

Conclusions: The nationwide GA EQA program scheme has substantially improved analytical performance and cultivated a robust quality assurance culture across participating laboratories. Persistent challenges to further elevating detection quality through EQA include sample commutability, procedure for target value assignment, and replicate samples. Moving forward, fostering collaborative engagement among all stakeholders are essential to overcome these limitations and establish a harmonized framework for GA detection.

2024-2025年全国糖化白蛋白检测外部质量评价:现状、挑战与展望
背景:糖化白蛋白(Glycated albumin, GA)是血糖的重要替代生物标志物,在糖尿病诊断中起着关键作用。鉴于GA检测方法在中国的统一状态仍不明确,实施外部质量评价(EQA)计划是评估其分析性能的必要条件。这将为支持患者的诊断和治疗提供可靠的信息。方法:国家临床实验室中心(NCCL,北京,中国)组织了一年两次的GA EQA计划。EQA样品被分发给参与者,参与者被要求每周期测量5个样品,并提交他们的结果以及所用试剂、方法和仪器的详细信息。在每个周期之后,NCCL编辑综合报告,总结个人实验室表现和分数,包括所有参与者结果的概述。结果:2024年和2025年,93.3% %和95.7% %的参与者分别取得了满意的年度绩效。遗传算法测量在制造商内部显示出高精度,制造商内部稳健变异系数(CV)的中位数低于3.1 %。然而,制造商之间存在显著差异:制造商之间的稳健CV中位数为6.5 %,与目标值的相对偏差中位数高达9.3 %,最大偏差高达40 %。基于实验室性能的分析显示,2024 - 2025年有稳步提升的趋势。结论:全国性的GA EQA计划方案大大提高了分析性能,并在参与的实验室中培养了强大的质量保证文化。通过EQA进一步提高检测质量的持续挑战包括样品可交换性、目标值分配程序和重复样品。展望未来,促进所有利益相关者之间的合作参与对于克服这些限制并建立遗传算法检测的统一框架至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信