Apprehending relational Events: The visual world paradigm and the Interplay of event perception and language.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Alon Hafri, John C Trueswell
{"title":"Apprehending relational Events: The visual world paradigm and the Interplay of event perception and language.","authors":"Alon Hafri, John C Trueswell","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.150000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When we observe the world, we appreciate not only the colors, shapes, and textures of people and objects, but also how they interact with one another (e.g., in events such as a girl pushing a boy). Although it might seem intuitive that extracting events and other relations would require active effort and multiple fixations, a growing body of vision research suggests that humans rapidly and automatically extract relational information-including the structure of events (i.e., who is acting on whom)-from a single fixation. These findings suggest that aspects of event structure can often be perceived without extensive visual interrogation. Yet despite this progress, much remains unknown about how visual events are perceived and represented-particularly for complex events (e.g., those involving roles beyond Agent and Patient, or events with multiple salient construals, such as chase vs. flee)-and how these emerging representations interact with language during interpretation and production of utterances about events. The visual world paradigm (VWP) offers a powerful tool to address these questions about the perception-language interface, by revealing which event representations are active when and by probing how language may guide event construal in real-time. We review eyetracking work in VWP studies of language comprehension and language production, as well as in related tasks, that provide initial insights into online event apprehension. This work suggests that (1) event apprehension and linguistic encoding are closely coordinated, interacting earlier and more continuously than previously recognized, and (2) fixations may serve to refine or disambiguate relational information extracted during initial processing- such as identifying event participants or clarifying their roles (e.g., as Instruments, Goals, or Recipients)-with language in some cases guiding attentional prioritization towards certain event components. More generally, this perspective offers a foundation for future VWP research exploring the dynamic relationship between seeing, listening, and speaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"150000"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.150000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we observe the world, we appreciate not only the colors, shapes, and textures of people and objects, but also how they interact with one another (e.g., in events such as a girl pushing a boy). Although it might seem intuitive that extracting events and other relations would require active effort and multiple fixations, a growing body of vision research suggests that humans rapidly and automatically extract relational information-including the structure of events (i.e., who is acting on whom)-from a single fixation. These findings suggest that aspects of event structure can often be perceived without extensive visual interrogation. Yet despite this progress, much remains unknown about how visual events are perceived and represented-particularly for complex events (e.g., those involving roles beyond Agent and Patient, or events with multiple salient construals, such as chase vs. flee)-and how these emerging representations interact with language during interpretation and production of utterances about events. The visual world paradigm (VWP) offers a powerful tool to address these questions about the perception-language interface, by revealing which event representations are active when and by probing how language may guide event construal in real-time. We review eyetracking work in VWP studies of language comprehension and language production, as well as in related tasks, that provide initial insights into online event apprehension. This work suggests that (1) event apprehension and linguistic encoding are closely coordinated, interacting earlier and more continuously than previously recognized, and (2) fixations may serve to refine or disambiguate relational information extracted during initial processing- such as identifying event participants or clarifying their roles (e.g., as Instruments, Goals, or Recipients)-with language in some cases guiding attentional prioritization towards certain event components. More generally, this perspective offers a foundation for future VWP research exploring the dynamic relationship between seeing, listening, and speaking.

关系事件的理解:视觉世界范式及事件知觉与语言的相互作用。
当我们观察世界时,我们不仅欣赏人和物体的颜色、形状和纹理,而且还欣赏它们之间的相互作用(例如,在女孩推男孩这样的事件中)。虽然提取事件和其他关系需要积极的努力和多次注视,这似乎是直觉,但越来越多的视觉研究表明,人类可以快速、自动地从单一注视中提取关系信息,包括事件的结构(即,谁对谁采取行动)。这些发现表明,事件结构的各个方面通常可以在没有广泛的视觉询问的情况下被感知。然而,尽管取得了这些进展,关于视觉事件是如何被感知和表征的,特别是对于复杂的事件(例如,那些涉及Agent和Patient之外的角色的事件,或具有多重显着识解的事件,例如追逐与逃跑),以及这些新兴的表征如何在解释和产生关于事件的话语时与语言相互作用,仍有很多未知。视觉世界范式(VWP)提供了一个强大的工具来解决这些关于感知-语言界面的问题,通过揭示哪些事件表征是活跃的,以及通过探索语言如何实时指导事件解释。我们回顾了在语言理解和语言产生的VWP研究以及相关任务中的眼动追踪工作,这些工作为在线事件理解提供了初步见解。这项工作表明:(1)事件理解和语言编码是紧密协调的,比之前认识到的更早、更持续地相互作用;(2)固着可能有助于提炼或消除在初始处理过程中提取的关系信息——例如识别事件参与者或澄清他们的角色(例如,作为工具、目标或接受者)——在某些情况下,语言引导注意力优先于某些事件组件。更广泛地说,这一观点为未来探索看、听、说之间动态关系的VWP研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信