Decoupling study on volatiles-char interaction during co-pyrolysis of dry/wet torrefied biomass and coal: Influence of pyrolysis temperature

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Yali Gao , Na Gao , Ziliang Zhang , Dengyu Chen , Jiaofei Wang , Xudong Song , Guangsuo Yu , Juntao Wei
{"title":"Decoupling study on volatiles-char interaction during co-pyrolysis of dry/wet torrefied biomass and coal: Influence of pyrolysis temperature","authors":"Yali Gao ,&nbsp;Na Gao ,&nbsp;Ziliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Dengyu Chen ,&nbsp;Jiaofei Wang ,&nbsp;Xudong Song ,&nbsp;Guangsuo Yu ,&nbsp;Juntao Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Torrefied biomass-coal co-pyrolysis was a promising route to realize high-efficiency utilization of renewable and fossil energy. Volatiles-char interaction during co-pyrolysis impacts char structure and downstream applications. However, the relevant mechanism remains unclear, and thus decoupling study was necessary. In this study, dry/wet torrefied biomass (RST300/RSH300) was prepared at 300 °C using autoclave reactor and fixed-bed reactor, respectively. Decoupled co-pyrolysis experiments were subsequently conducted at different pyrolysis temperatures (600, 700 and 800 °C) using a staged fixed-bed reactor. Furthermore, various structural characterization techniques (SEM, Raman and FTIR) were coupled to explore the pathway influencing the char structure evolution. The decoupling studies of RST/RSH300-BC co-pyrolysis showed that compared to BC char from individual pyrolysis, RST-BC co-pyrolysis led to significantly more surface deposits. In contrast, RSH-BC co-pyrolysis produced BC char with diverse crack morphologies. At all temperatures, the -OH and C=C peak intensities in RSH-BC chars were much higher than in RST-BC chars. The graphitic ordering of BC chars from both co-pyrolysis systems decreased compared to individual pyrolysis, with RSH300-BC showing a more pronounced reduction. The decoupling results of BC-RST/RSH300 revealed that compared to individual RST/RSH chars, co-pyrolyzed RST char had partially blocked cracks at 700 °C and 800 °C. Both co-pyrolyzed RST/RSH300 char showed higher -OH and C-O-C peak intensities. Notably, at 600 °C and 700 °C, the graphitic ordering improved in both co-pyrolyzed RST/RSH300 chars, with RSH chars showing significant enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125003757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Torrefied biomass-coal co-pyrolysis was a promising route to realize high-efficiency utilization of renewable and fossil energy. Volatiles-char interaction during co-pyrolysis impacts char structure and downstream applications. However, the relevant mechanism remains unclear, and thus decoupling study was necessary. In this study, dry/wet torrefied biomass (RST300/RSH300) was prepared at 300 °C using autoclave reactor and fixed-bed reactor, respectively. Decoupled co-pyrolysis experiments were subsequently conducted at different pyrolysis temperatures (600, 700 and 800 °C) using a staged fixed-bed reactor. Furthermore, various structural characterization techniques (SEM, Raman and FTIR) were coupled to explore the pathway influencing the char structure evolution. The decoupling studies of RST/RSH300-BC co-pyrolysis showed that compared to BC char from individual pyrolysis, RST-BC co-pyrolysis led to significantly more surface deposits. In contrast, RSH-BC co-pyrolysis produced BC char with diverse crack morphologies. At all temperatures, the -OH and C=C peak intensities in RSH-BC chars were much higher than in RST-BC chars. The graphitic ordering of BC chars from both co-pyrolysis systems decreased compared to individual pyrolysis, with RSH300-BC showing a more pronounced reduction. The decoupling results of BC-RST/RSH300 revealed that compared to individual RST/RSH chars, co-pyrolyzed RST char had partially blocked cracks at 700 °C and 800 °C. Both co-pyrolyzed RST/RSH300 char showed higher -OH and C-O-C peak intensities. Notably, at 600 °C and 700 °C, the graphitic ordering improved in both co-pyrolyzed RST/RSH300 chars, with RSH chars showing significant enhancement.
干湿碳化生物质与煤共热解过程中挥发物-炭相互作用的解耦研究:热解温度的影响
碳化生物质-煤共热解是实现可再生能源和化石能源高效利用的一条很有前途的途径。共热解过程中挥发物-焦炭相互作用影响焦炭结构和下游应用。然而,相关机制尚不清楚,因此有必要进行解耦研究。在300℃的高温下,采用蒸压釜反应器和固定床反应器分别制备干/湿碳化生物质(RST300/RSH300)。随后,采用分段固定床反应器在不同热解温度(600、700和800℃)下进行解耦共热解实验。此外,还结合了多种结构表征技术(SEM, Raman和FTIR)来探索影响炭结构演变的途径。RST/RSH300-BC共热解的解耦研究表明,与单独热解的BC焦相比,RST-BC共热解产生的表面沉积物明显更多。相比之下,RSH-BC共热解产生的BC焦具有不同的裂纹形态。在所有温度下,RSH-BC炭的-OH和C=C峰强度都明显高于RST-BC炭。与单独热解相比,两种共热解体系的BC炭的石墨有序度都有所下降,其中RSH300-BC的下降更为明显。BC-RST/RSH300的解耦结果表明,与单独的RST/RSH相比,共热解的RST在700℃和800℃时部分堵塞了裂缝。两种共热解RST/RSH300焦均表现出较高的-OH和C-O-C峰强度。值得注意的是,在600°C和700°C时,RST/RSH300共热解炭的石墨有序度都得到了改善,其中RSH炭的石墨有序度得到了显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Energy Institute
Journal of The Energy Institute 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include: Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards; Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS; Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems Energy storage The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信