The impact of 2D/3D building morphology and green spaces on urban heat environments: Relative contributions, interaction and marginal effects

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Donghui Bai , Chunping Miao , Yafei Xi , Hongyi Liu , Chao He
{"title":"The impact of 2D/3D building morphology and green spaces on urban heat environments: Relative contributions, interaction and marginal effects","authors":"Donghui Bai ,&nbsp;Chunping Miao ,&nbsp;Yafei Xi ,&nbsp;Hongyi Liu ,&nbsp;Chao He","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building and green space morphology are considered key factors in urban heat regulation. Investigating their interactive effects on the urban heat environment provides both a decision support basis for urban planning and a new theoretical perspective for understanding the relationship between urban morphology and heat environments. This study analyzed the interaction between building morphology and green space on land surface temperature (LST) by integrating XGBoost and Geodetector and explored the nonlinear regression relationships between these factors and LST in Xi’an, China. The results revealed strengthened interactive effects between the average building height, average building volume, building surface area, and floor area ratio with green space on LST. In contrast, the interaction between the building coverage ratio and green space on LST was nonlinearly weakened. LST was the lowest when the green space’s area fractal dimension was 0.75–1.25. A green coverage ratio of 0.18–0.7 realized relatively strong cooling effects. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values increased with the building coverage ratio but were negative when the building coverage ratio was below 0.6, where its interaction with smaller green space area, lower total edge length, and higher area fractal dimension produced lower SHAP values. The findings offer scientific support for mitigating the urban heat island effect, thus contributing to the ecological construction and sustainable development of cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 114296"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25012282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building and green space morphology are considered key factors in urban heat regulation. Investigating their interactive effects on the urban heat environment provides both a decision support basis for urban planning and a new theoretical perspective for understanding the relationship between urban morphology and heat environments. This study analyzed the interaction between building morphology and green space on land surface temperature (LST) by integrating XGBoost and Geodetector and explored the nonlinear regression relationships between these factors and LST in Xi’an, China. The results revealed strengthened interactive effects between the average building height, average building volume, building surface area, and floor area ratio with green space on LST. In contrast, the interaction between the building coverage ratio and green space on LST was nonlinearly weakened. LST was the lowest when the green space’s area fractal dimension was 0.75–1.25. A green coverage ratio of 0.18–0.7 realized relatively strong cooling effects. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values increased with the building coverage ratio but were negative when the building coverage ratio was below 0.6, where its interaction with smaller green space area, lower total edge length, and higher area fractal dimension produced lower SHAP values. The findings offer scientific support for mitigating the urban heat island effect, thus contributing to the ecological construction and sustainable development of cities.
二维/三维建筑形态和绿地对城市热环境的影响:相对贡献、相互作用和边际效应
建筑和绿地形态被认为是城市热调节的关键因素。研究它们对城市热环境的交互作用,不仅为城市规划提供决策支持依据,也为理解城市形态与热环境的关系提供了新的理论视角。利用XGBoost和Geodetector,分析了西安市建筑形态与绿地对地表温度的相互作用,并探讨了这些因素与地表温度之间的非线性回归关系。结果表明,平均建筑高度、平均建筑体积、建筑表面积、容积率与绿地对地表温度的交互作用增强。而建筑覆盖率与绿地空间在地表温度上的相互作用呈非线性减弱。当绿地面积分形维数为0.75 ~ 1.25时,地表温度最低。绿色覆盖率为0.18-0.7时,降温效果较好。Shapley可加性解释(Shapley Additive Explanation, SHAP)值随着建筑覆盖率的增加而增加,但当建筑覆盖率低于0.6时,Shapley可加性解释值为负,与绿地面积较小、边缘总长度较小、面积分形维数较高的交互作用产生较低的SHAP值。研究结果为缓解城市热岛效应提供了科学依据,有助于城市生态建设和可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信