Food neophobia affects willingness to try novel alternative proteins in young adults in Spain and the Netherlands

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105749
J.W. Vermetten , M.J.E. Urlings , E. van den Heuvel , L. Domínguez , V. Fernández-Ruiz , M. Cámara , A. de Boer
{"title":"Food neophobia affects willingness to try novel alternative proteins in young adults in Spain and the Netherlands","authors":"J.W. Vermetten ,&nbsp;M.J.E. Urlings ,&nbsp;E. van den Heuvel ,&nbsp;L. Domínguez ,&nbsp;V. Fernández-Ruiz ,&nbsp;M. Cámara ,&nbsp;A. de Boer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the global population grows and environmental concerns intensify, adopting more sustainable protein sources becomes increasingly crucial. This study examines the influence of food neophobia (FN) and food technology neophobia (FTN) on consumers' willingness to try (WTT) novel alternative proteins, specifically insect- and plant-based proteins (mealworm and mung bean protein) and whey, as a familiar control protein. In this context, it also examines the impact of protein-related health claims and compares the responses of residents in two European countries, Spain and the Netherlands. Through an online survey, the WTT of whey, mung bean and mealworm protein were measured in 200 Dutch and 202 Spanish young adults (18–40 years). Results indicated that WTT was inversely correlated with FN for plant protein and insect protein and FTN for plant and insect protein. While this relationship is significant, it only explains between 5.3 and 12.3 % of the variance. A lower WTT was reported for insects than for plant protein (mean 3.0 vs 5.0 on a 7-point Likert scale). A protein-related health claim did not affect WTT. Spanish consumers showed similar results to Dutch consumers but had lower WTT for insect protein (mean 2.7 vs 3.3). This study reveals a promising opportunity for mung bean protein as a preferred dietary protein source for young adults in the European Union, while also highlighting the challenges in accepting mealworm protein. Transitioning to alternative proteins seems to require a source-specific approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105749"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325003246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the global population grows and environmental concerns intensify, adopting more sustainable protein sources becomes increasingly crucial. This study examines the influence of food neophobia (FN) and food technology neophobia (FTN) on consumers' willingness to try (WTT) novel alternative proteins, specifically insect- and plant-based proteins (mealworm and mung bean protein) and whey, as a familiar control protein. In this context, it also examines the impact of protein-related health claims and compares the responses of residents in two European countries, Spain and the Netherlands. Through an online survey, the WTT of whey, mung bean and mealworm protein were measured in 200 Dutch and 202 Spanish young adults (18–40 years). Results indicated that WTT was inversely correlated with FN for plant protein and insect protein and FTN for plant and insect protein. While this relationship is significant, it only explains between 5.3 and 12.3 % of the variance. A lower WTT was reported for insects than for plant protein (mean 3.0 vs 5.0 on a 7-point Likert scale). A protein-related health claim did not affect WTT. Spanish consumers showed similar results to Dutch consumers but had lower WTT for insect protein (mean 2.7 vs 3.3). This study reveals a promising opportunity for mung bean protein as a preferred dietary protein source for young adults in the European Union, while also highlighting the challenges in accepting mealworm protein. Transitioning to alternative proteins seems to require a source-specific approach.

Abstract Image

在西班牙和荷兰,新食物恐惧症影响了年轻人尝试新型替代蛋白质的意愿
随着全球人口的增长和环境问题的加剧,采用更可持续的蛋白质来源变得越来越重要。本研究考察了食品新恐惧症(FN)和食品技术新恐惧症(FTN)对消费者尝试新型替代蛋白(WTT)意愿的影响,特别是昆虫和植物蛋白(粉虫和绿豆蛋白)和乳清,作为一种熟悉的对照蛋白。在此背景下,它还研究了蛋白质相关健康声明的影响,并比较了西班牙和荷兰两个欧洲国家居民的反应。通过一项在线调查,测量了200名荷兰和202名西班牙年轻人(18-40岁)的乳清、绿豆和粉虫蛋白的WTT。结果表明,WTT与植物蛋白和昆虫蛋白的FN、植物蛋白和昆虫蛋白的FTN呈负相关。虽然这种关系很重要,但它只能解释5.3%到12.3%的差异。据报道,昆虫的WTT低于植物蛋白(在7点李克特量表上平均3.0 vs 5.0)。与蛋白质有关的健康声明对WTT没有影响。西班牙消费者的结果与荷兰消费者相似,但昆虫蛋白的WTT较低(平均2.7 vs 3.3)。这项研究揭示了绿豆蛋白作为欧盟年轻人首选的膳食蛋白质来源的一个有希望的机会,同时也强调了接受粉虫蛋白的挑战。过渡到替代蛋白质似乎需要一种特定于源的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书