Beyond Symbolic Inclusion: Exploring resistance to the inclusion of women in the Indian maritime industry

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alisha Rath, Atisha Panda, Lalatendu Kesari Jena
{"title":"Beyond Symbolic Inclusion: Exploring resistance to the inclusion of women in the Indian maritime industry","authors":"Alisha Rath,&nbsp;Atisha Panda,&nbsp;Lalatendu Kesari Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study critically examines the entrenched socio-cultural, institutional, and operational obstacles that impede the substantive inclusion of women within the maritime sector. Utilizing qualitative data derived from comprehensive interviews with thirty-five diverse Indian-origin seafarers, positioned as officers and engineers, this research applies interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to elucidate the manifestations, functions, and negotiations of gendered resistance in this historically male-dominated environment. The lived experiences of seafarers in the industry underscore both the constraints they encounter and the subtle forms of resistance they enact throughout their professional trajectories, prompting a critical re-evaluation of institutional inertia, symbolic inclusion, and the concept of gendered agency. This research is fundamentally guided by gender role theory and institutional theory, which inform both the research questions and the conceptualization of resistance. To examine how deeply entrenched impede reform efforts, this study draws upon organizational change models. Furthermore, the discussion integrates feminist institutionalism and intersectionality to underscore the wider implications of these dynamics and the multifaceted nature of exclusion. The findings advocate for profound, justice-centered reforms that reconceptualize gender inclusion as an ongoing process of systemic realignment rather than superficial tokenism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study critically examines the entrenched socio-cultural, institutional, and operational obstacles that impede the substantive inclusion of women within the maritime sector. Utilizing qualitative data derived from comprehensive interviews with thirty-five diverse Indian-origin seafarers, positioned as officers and engineers, this research applies interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to elucidate the manifestations, functions, and negotiations of gendered resistance in this historically male-dominated environment. The lived experiences of seafarers in the industry underscore both the constraints they encounter and the subtle forms of resistance they enact throughout their professional trajectories, prompting a critical re-evaluation of institutional inertia, symbolic inclusion, and the concept of gendered agency. This research is fundamentally guided by gender role theory and institutional theory, which inform both the research questions and the conceptualization of resistance. To examine how deeply entrenched impede reform efforts, this study draws upon organizational change models. Furthermore, the discussion integrates feminist institutionalism and intersectionality to underscore the wider implications of these dynamics and the multifaceted nature of exclusion. The findings advocate for profound, justice-centered reforms that reconceptualize gender inclusion as an ongoing process of systemic realignment rather than superficial tokenism.
超越象征性包容:探索印度海事行业对女性包容的抵制
本研究严格审查了阻碍妇女实质性融入海事部门的根深蒂固的社会文化、体制和业务障碍。本研究利用对35名不同的印度裔海员的综合访谈得出的定性数据,这些海员被定位为军官和工程师,本研究应用解释现象学分析(IPA)来阐明在这个历史上男性主导的环境中性别抵抗的表现、功能和谈判。海员在该行业的生活经历强调了他们在整个职业轨迹中遇到的限制和微妙的抵抗形式,促使人们对制度惰性、象征性包容和性别代理概念进行批判性的重新评估。本研究从根本上以性别角色理论和制度理论为指导,为研究问题和抵抗的概念化提供了依据。为了检验根深蒂固的阻碍改革努力的程度,本研究借鉴了组织变革模型。此外,讨论整合了女权主义制度主义和交叉性,以强调这些动态的更广泛含义和排斥的多面性。研究结果主张进行深刻的、以正义为中心的改革,将性别包容重新定义为一个持续的系统重组过程,而不是表面上的象征性行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信