Relationship between subjective wellbeing, personality traits, and lifestyle migration: A web-based survey analysis in Japan

IF 2.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2025.100312
Kento Katsuragawa , Ryo Saito , Anna Suzuki , Makiko Takao
{"title":"Relationship between subjective wellbeing, personality traits, and lifestyle migration: A web-based survey analysis in Japan","authors":"Kento Katsuragawa ,&nbsp;Ryo Saito ,&nbsp;Anna Suzuki ,&nbsp;Makiko Takao","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lifestyle migration refers to voluntary urban-rural relocation in pursuit of self-realization and a better quality of life. Although its popularity has grown particularly in aging societies and amid the expansion of remote work, empirical evidence on its relationship with subjective wellbeing (SWB) remains limited. This study examines associations among actual lifestyle migration, SWB, and personality traits in Japan, a context paralleling European trends but features strong policy support for regional relocation. A web-based survey of 905 adults in Japan (230 lifestyle migrants and 675 urban residents [non-migrants]) assessed SWB using three indicators (Cantril’s Ladder [CL], Satisfaction With Life Scale [SWLS], Interdependent Happiness Scale [IHS]) and personality using the Japanese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J). Lifestyle migrants scored higher in openness and conscientiousness and lower in neuroticism, whereas no significant differences were observed for extraversion or agreeableness. Between-group differences in SWB were limited: the migration status was not significantly associated with CL or IHS and showed a small positive association with the 10 % level for SWLS after adjustment for covariates. Within the lifestyle migrants, openness was negatively associated with CL, agreeableness was positively associated with IHS and marginally with SWLS, and neuroticism was negatively associated with SWLS. Self-rated health was positively associated with all outcomes. Overall, the findings partly support the existence of a distinct migrant profile but indicate only modest adjusted SWB advantages after migration. The negative association between openness and CL may reflect friction between novelty seeking and adaptation to local norms. Receptive communities may help mitigate this friction and enhance wellbeing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lifestyle migration refers to voluntary urban-rural relocation in pursuit of self-realization and a better quality of life. Although its popularity has grown particularly in aging societies and amid the expansion of remote work, empirical evidence on its relationship with subjective wellbeing (SWB) remains limited. This study examines associations among actual lifestyle migration, SWB, and personality traits in Japan, a context paralleling European trends but features strong policy support for regional relocation. A web-based survey of 905 adults in Japan (230 lifestyle migrants and 675 urban residents [non-migrants]) assessed SWB using three indicators (Cantril’s Ladder [CL], Satisfaction With Life Scale [SWLS], Interdependent Happiness Scale [IHS]) and personality using the Japanese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J). Lifestyle migrants scored higher in openness and conscientiousness and lower in neuroticism, whereas no significant differences were observed for extraversion or agreeableness. Between-group differences in SWB were limited: the migration status was not significantly associated with CL or IHS and showed a small positive association with the 10 % level for SWLS after adjustment for covariates. Within the lifestyle migrants, openness was negatively associated with CL, agreeableness was positively associated with IHS and marginally with SWLS, and neuroticism was negatively associated with SWLS. Self-rated health was positively associated with all outcomes. Overall, the findings partly support the existence of a distinct migrant profile but indicate only modest adjusted SWB advantages after migration. The negative association between openness and CL may reflect friction between novelty seeking and adaptation to local norms. Receptive communities may help mitigate this friction and enhance wellbeing.
主观幸福感、人格特质与生活方式迁移的关系:一项基于网络的日本调查分析
生活方式迁移是指为了追求自我实现和更好的生活质量而自愿进行的城乡迁移。尽管它在老龄化社会和远程工作的扩大中越来越受欢迎,但其与主观幸福感(SWB)关系的实证证据仍然有限。本研究考察了日本实际生活方式移民、SWB和个性特征之间的关系,日本的背景与欧洲的趋势相似,但对区域迁移有强有力的政策支持。一项针对905名日本成年人(230名生活方式移民和675名城市居民[非移民])的网络调查使用三个指标(坎特里尔阶梯量表[CL]、生活满意度量表[SWLS]、相互依赖幸福量表[IHS])和日本十项人格量表(TIPI-J)来评估幸福感。生活方式移民在开放性和严谨性方面得分较高,在神经质方面得分较低,而在外向性和宜人性方面没有观察到显著差异。SWB的组间差异是有限的:迁移状态与CL或IHS没有显著相关,并且在调整协变量后与SWLS的10%水平显示出小的正相关。在生活方式移民中,开放性与CL呈负相关,亲和性与IHS呈正相关,与SWLS呈微弱相关,神经质与SWLS呈负相关。自评健康与所有结果呈正相关。总体而言,研究结果在一定程度上支持了明显的移民特征的存在,但表明移民后调整后的SWB优势并不大。开放性与语言学习之间的负相关关系可能反映了求新与适应当地规范之间的摩擦。接纳型社区可能有助于缓解这种摩擦,提高幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书