Stone tool use as an adaptive technology: A meta-analysis of functional estimates on use-wear traces from early, middle, and late Upper Paleolithic industries in the northeastern Japanese Archipelago

Quaternary Environments and Humans Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100084
Akira Iwase
{"title":"Stone tool use as an adaptive technology: A meta-analysis of functional estimates on use-wear traces from early, middle, and late Upper Paleolithic industries in the northeastern Japanese Archipelago","authors":"Akira Iwase","doi":"10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 1980s, the development of experimental traceological studies has enabled archaeologists to estimate the intended use of Paleolithic stone tools whose functions were unclear. Despite the functional analyses of over 5500 Japanese Upper Paleolithic artifacts, how stone tool use was organized in response to the Late Pleistocene environmental changes remains poorly understood. Using an updated database of Japanese Upper Paleolithic functional studies, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of functional estimates from use-wear traces to examine the differences in stone tool use among three lithic industries in the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island: Trapezoid (early Upper Paleolithic: EUP, c. 38–32 cal ka BP), Blade point (middle Upper Paleolithic: MUP, c. 32–23 cal ka BP), and Microblade (late Upper Paleolithic: LUP, c. 18–16 cal ka BP) and to discuss how Paleolithic hunter-gatherers organized and adapted their tool use strategies during Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 2. Results suggest that EUP, MUP, and LUP populations organized their stone tool uses differently. The EUP foragers used trapezoidal tools multifunctionally, though infrequently for shaping non-lithic and/or complex tools. In contrast, LUP foragers honed technologies to maintain diverse stone toolkits specialized for processing non-lithic and complex tools. MUP foragers possessed blade tools with a moderate frequency of toolmaking traces and moderate multifunctionality. Taken together, observed diversity of stone tool use likely reflect differences in the toolkit structures that Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers designed to adapt to the Late Pleistocene environments on the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101053,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the development of experimental traceological studies has enabled archaeologists to estimate the intended use of Paleolithic stone tools whose functions were unclear. Despite the functional analyses of over 5500 Japanese Upper Paleolithic artifacts, how stone tool use was organized in response to the Late Pleistocene environmental changes remains poorly understood. Using an updated database of Japanese Upper Paleolithic functional studies, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of functional estimates from use-wear traces to examine the differences in stone tool use among three lithic industries in the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island: Trapezoid (early Upper Paleolithic: EUP, c. 38–32 cal ka BP), Blade point (middle Upper Paleolithic: MUP, c. 32–23 cal ka BP), and Microblade (late Upper Paleolithic: LUP, c. 18–16 cal ka BP) and to discuss how Paleolithic hunter-gatherers organized and adapted their tool use strategies during Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 2. Results suggest that EUP, MUP, and LUP populations organized their stone tool uses differently. The EUP foragers used trapezoidal tools multifunctionally, though infrequently for shaping non-lithic and/or complex tools. In contrast, LUP foragers honed technologies to maintain diverse stone toolkits specialized for processing non-lithic and complex tools. MUP foragers possessed blade tools with a moderate frequency of toolmaking traces and moderate multifunctionality. Taken together, observed diversity of stone tool use likely reflect differences in the toolkit structures that Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers designed to adapt to the Late Pleistocene environments on the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island.
作为一种适应性技术的石器使用:日本群岛东北部旧石器时代早期、中期和晚期工业使用磨损痕迹的功能估计的荟萃分析
自20世纪80年代以来,实验痕迹学研究的发展使考古学家能够估计旧石器时代石器工具的预期用途,这些工具的功能尚不清楚。尽管对5500多件日本旧石器时代晚期文物进行了功能分析,但人们对石器工具的使用如何响应晚更新世的环境变化仍然知之甚少。本文利用更新的日本旧石器时代晚期功能研究数据库,对使用磨损痕迹的功能估计进行了荟合分析,以检验古本州岛东北部三个石器工业之间的石器工具使用差异:三角区(旧石器时代早期:EUP,约38-32 cal ka BP)、刀尖区(旧石器时代中期:MUP,约32-23 cal ka BP)和微刀片区(旧石器时代晚期:LUP, c. 18-16 cal ka BP),并讨论在海洋同位素阶段3和2,旧石器时代的狩猎采集者如何组织和适应他们的工具使用策略。结果表明,EUP、MUP和LUP人群使用石器的组织方式不同。EUP采集者将梯形工具用于多种用途,尽管很少用于塑造非石器和/或复杂的工具。相比之下,LUP采集者磨练技术来维护各种专门用于加工非石器和复杂工具的石器工具包。MUP采集者拥有具有中等频率的工具制造痕迹和中等多功能的刀片工具。总的来说,观察到的石器使用多样性可能反映了旧石器时代晚期狩猎采集者为适应古本州岛东北部晚更新世环境而设计的工具包结构的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书