Stone tool use as an adaptive technology: A meta-analysis of functional estimates on use-wear traces from early, middle, and late Upper Paleolithic industries in the northeastern Japanese Archipelago
{"title":"Stone tool use as an adaptive technology: A meta-analysis of functional estimates on use-wear traces from early, middle, and late Upper Paleolithic industries in the northeastern Japanese Archipelago","authors":"Akira Iwase","doi":"10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 1980s, the development of experimental traceological studies has enabled archaeologists to estimate the intended use of Paleolithic stone tools whose functions were unclear. Despite the functional analyses of over 5500 Japanese Upper Paleolithic artifacts, how stone tool use was organized in response to the Late Pleistocene environmental changes remains poorly understood. Using an updated database of Japanese Upper Paleolithic functional studies, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of functional estimates from use-wear traces to examine the differences in stone tool use among three lithic industries in the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island: Trapezoid (early Upper Paleolithic: EUP, c. 38–32 cal ka BP), Blade point (middle Upper Paleolithic: MUP, c. 32–23 cal ka BP), and Microblade (late Upper Paleolithic: LUP, c. 18–16 cal ka BP) and to discuss how Paleolithic hunter-gatherers organized and adapted their tool use strategies during Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 2. Results suggest that EUP, MUP, and LUP populations organized their stone tool uses differently. The EUP foragers used trapezoidal tools multifunctionally, though infrequently for shaping non-lithic and/or complex tools. In contrast, LUP foragers honed technologies to maintain diverse stone toolkits specialized for processing non-lithic and complex tools. MUP foragers possessed blade tools with a moderate frequency of toolmaking traces and moderate multifunctionality. Taken together, observed diversity of stone tool use likely reflect differences in the toolkit structures that Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers designed to adapt to the Late Pleistocene environments on the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101053,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the 1980s, the development of experimental traceological studies has enabled archaeologists to estimate the intended use of Paleolithic stone tools whose functions were unclear. Despite the functional analyses of over 5500 Japanese Upper Paleolithic artifacts, how stone tool use was organized in response to the Late Pleistocene environmental changes remains poorly understood. Using an updated database of Japanese Upper Paleolithic functional studies, this paper conducts a meta-analysis of functional estimates from use-wear traces to examine the differences in stone tool use among three lithic industries in the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island: Trapezoid (early Upper Paleolithic: EUP, c. 38–32 cal ka BP), Blade point (middle Upper Paleolithic: MUP, c. 32–23 cal ka BP), and Microblade (late Upper Paleolithic: LUP, c. 18–16 cal ka BP) and to discuss how Paleolithic hunter-gatherers organized and adapted their tool use strategies during Marine Isotope Stages 3 and 2. Results suggest that EUP, MUP, and LUP populations organized their stone tool uses differently. The EUP foragers used trapezoidal tools multifunctionally, though infrequently for shaping non-lithic and/or complex tools. In contrast, LUP foragers honed technologies to maintain diverse stone toolkits specialized for processing non-lithic and complex tools. MUP foragers possessed blade tools with a moderate frequency of toolmaking traces and moderate multifunctionality. Taken together, observed diversity of stone tool use likely reflect differences in the toolkit structures that Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers designed to adapt to the Late Pleistocene environments on the northeastern Paleo-Honshu Island.
自20世纪80年代以来,实验痕迹学研究的发展使考古学家能够估计旧石器时代石器工具的预期用途,这些工具的功能尚不清楚。尽管对5500多件日本旧石器时代晚期文物进行了功能分析,但人们对石器工具的使用如何响应晚更新世的环境变化仍然知之甚少。本文利用更新的日本旧石器时代晚期功能研究数据库,对使用磨损痕迹的功能估计进行了荟合分析,以检验古本州岛东北部三个石器工业之间的石器工具使用差异:三角区(旧石器时代早期:EUP,约38-32 cal ka BP)、刀尖区(旧石器时代中期:MUP,约32-23 cal ka BP)和微刀片区(旧石器时代晚期:LUP, c. 18-16 cal ka BP),并讨论在海洋同位素阶段3和2,旧石器时代的狩猎采集者如何组织和适应他们的工具使用策略。结果表明,EUP、MUP和LUP人群使用石器的组织方式不同。EUP采集者将梯形工具用于多种用途,尽管很少用于塑造非石器和/或复杂的工具。相比之下,LUP采集者磨练技术来维护各种专门用于加工非石器和复杂工具的石器工具包。MUP采集者拥有具有中等频率的工具制造痕迹和中等多功能的刀片工具。总的来说,观察到的石器使用多样性可能反映了旧石器时代晚期狩猎采集者为适应古本州岛东北部晚更新世环境而设计的工具包结构的差异。