The coevolution of languages, peoples and environments in Central Africa’s Kwilu-Kasai region since ∼1000 BCE: A dialogue with Jan Vansina

Quaternary Environments and Humans Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100088
Koen Bostoen , Peter Coutros , Jessamy Doman , Cesar Fortes-Lima , Sara Pacchiarotti , Carina Schlebusch
{"title":"The coevolution of languages, peoples and environments in Central Africa’s Kwilu-Kasai region since ∼1000 BCE: A dialogue with Jan Vansina","authors":"Koen Bostoen ,&nbsp;Peter Coutros ,&nbsp;Jessamy Doman ,&nbsp;Cesar Fortes-Lima ,&nbsp;Sara Pacchiarotti ,&nbsp;Carina Schlebusch","doi":"10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, Jan Vansina’s essay on the deep-time population history of the Kwilu-Kasai region, now more than half a century old, is revisited through the kaleidoscopic lens of newly collected linguistic, archaeological, palaeoecological and genetic evidence collected between 2018 and 2023. In contrast to Vansina’s view of the region as a terminus for the settlement of diverse Bantu speech communities, the area was likely an important center of diversification and expansion for early Bantu speakers. Under a drier climate favoring the increase of grassland and open woodland around Idiofa but not a general loss of the forest cover, Bantu speakers most probably started occupying the region from the 4th century BCE onwards. Pottery-producing settlements first emerge along the Kwilu River, i.e., at Luani (371–148 BCE) and Lukombe (357–27 BCE), and then near Idiofa (146–18 BCE), where the earliest evidence for iron metallurgy marks the actual start of the Early Iron Age (146 BCE-750CE) south of the Congo rainforest. The first settlers lived in small and enclaved communities without much mutual communication. These were perfect conditions for early divergence within the Bantu language family’s major West-Coastal Bantu branch. While modern language data situate the West-Coastal Bantu homeland between the Kasai and Kamtsha Rivers, this zone was only settled towards the beginning of the common era based on the currently available archaeological data. This apparent mismatch between archaeology and historical linguistics might be due to subsequent processes of language death and population relocation and restructuring. Confirming Vansina’s idea that modern-day Kwilu-Kasai communities do not directly descend from the region’s earliest Bantu-speaking settlers, significant population reshuffling did indeed occur after the Early Iron Age. During the so-called ‘hiatus period’ (750–1450 CE), human activity contracted to a few refuge areas, especially near the modern towns of Bandundu and Idiofa, and the vegetation underwent an irreversible climate-induced shift to open habitats, possibly connected to the Medieval Climate Anomaly. During the Late Iron Age, the study area was rapidly resettled, first in the south (15–16th c. CE), and then in the north (17–18th c. CE), and large cross-regional exchange networks developed. In line with oral histories still existing among Kwilu-Kasai peoples today and with the clans and political and social institutions they share, the region underwent a very advanced demographic, linguistic and cultural integration in the four to five centuries preceding the start of European colonization, which may have involved populations no longer present there today, such as Ubangi-speaking groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101053,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Environments and Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, Jan Vansina’s essay on the deep-time population history of the Kwilu-Kasai region, now more than half a century old, is revisited through the kaleidoscopic lens of newly collected linguistic, archaeological, palaeoecological and genetic evidence collected between 2018 and 2023. In contrast to Vansina’s view of the region as a terminus for the settlement of diverse Bantu speech communities, the area was likely an important center of diversification and expansion for early Bantu speakers. Under a drier climate favoring the increase of grassland and open woodland around Idiofa but not a general loss of the forest cover, Bantu speakers most probably started occupying the region from the 4th century BCE onwards. Pottery-producing settlements first emerge along the Kwilu River, i.e., at Luani (371–148 BCE) and Lukombe (357–27 BCE), and then near Idiofa (146–18 BCE), where the earliest evidence for iron metallurgy marks the actual start of the Early Iron Age (146 BCE-750CE) south of the Congo rainforest. The first settlers lived in small and enclaved communities without much mutual communication. These were perfect conditions for early divergence within the Bantu language family’s major West-Coastal Bantu branch. While modern language data situate the West-Coastal Bantu homeland between the Kasai and Kamtsha Rivers, this zone was only settled towards the beginning of the common era based on the currently available archaeological data. This apparent mismatch between archaeology and historical linguistics might be due to subsequent processes of language death and population relocation and restructuring. Confirming Vansina’s idea that modern-day Kwilu-Kasai communities do not directly descend from the region’s earliest Bantu-speaking settlers, significant population reshuffling did indeed occur after the Early Iron Age. During the so-called ‘hiatus period’ (750–1450 CE), human activity contracted to a few refuge areas, especially near the modern towns of Bandundu and Idiofa, and the vegetation underwent an irreversible climate-induced shift to open habitats, possibly connected to the Medieval Climate Anomaly. During the Late Iron Age, the study area was rapidly resettled, first in the south (15–16th c. CE), and then in the north (17–18th c. CE), and large cross-regional exchange networks developed. In line with oral histories still existing among Kwilu-Kasai peoples today and with the clans and political and social institutions they share, the region underwent a very advanced demographic, linguistic and cultural integration in the four to five centuries preceding the start of European colonization, which may have involved populations no longer present there today, such as Ubangi-speaking groups.
自公元前1000年以来中非Kwilu-Kasai地区语言、民族和环境的共同进化:与Jan Vansina的对话
本文通过2018年至2023年间新收集的语言学、考古学、古生态学和遗传学证据的万花筒镜头,重新审视了Jan Vansina关于Kwilu-Kasai地区人口深度历史的文章,该文章已有半个多世纪的历史。与Vansina的观点相反,该地区是不同班图语社区定居的终点,该地区可能是早期班图语群体多样化和扩张的重要中心。由于气候干燥,有利于在Idiofa周围增加草原和开阔林地,而不是森林覆盖的普遍损失,班图人很可能从公元前4世纪开始占领该地区。陶器生产定居点首先出现在Kwilu河沿岸,即Luani(公元前371-148年)和Lukombe(公元前357-27年),然后出现在Idiofa(公元前146 - 18年)附近,那里最早的铁冶金证据标志着刚果雨林以南早期铁器时代(公元前146 -750年)的实际开始。第一批定居者住在小而封闭的社区里,没有太多的相互交流。这些都是班图语系主要的西海岸班图语系早期分化的完美条件。虽然现代语言资料将西海岸班图人的家园定位在开赛河和坎察河之间,但根据目前可获得的考古资料,这个区域直到共同时代开始时才被确定下来。考古学和历史语言学之间这种明显的不匹配可能是由于语言死亡和人口迁移和重组的后续过程。证实了万西纳的观点,即现代的Kwilu-Kasai社区并不是直接来自该地区最早的班图语定居者,重大的人口重组确实发生在早期铁器时代之后。在所谓的“间歇期”(公元750-1450年),人类活动收缩到一些避难区域,特别是在现代城镇班顿杜和伊迪法附近,植被经历了不可逆转的气候引起的向开放栖息地的转变,这可能与中世纪气候异常有关。在铁器时代晚期,研究区域迅速迁移,首先迁移到南部(公元15 - 16年),然后迁移到北部(公元17 - 18年),并形成了大型的跨区域交换网络。根据今天Kwilu-Kasai人民之间仍然存在的口述历史,以及他们共有的部族和政治及社会制度,在欧洲殖民开始之前的四五个世纪,该地区经历了一次非常先进的人口、语言和文化一体化,其中可能涉及今天已经不复存在的人口,例如讲乌班吉语的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书