Comprehensive site screening and selection for offshore CO2 storage in the Early Miocene formations of the eastern Gunsan Basin, Yellow Sea

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kyoung-Jin Kim , Moohee Kang , Snons Cheong , Kue-Young Kim , In-Sun Song , Kwanghyun Kim
{"title":"Comprehensive site screening and selection for offshore CO2 storage in the Early Miocene formations of the eastern Gunsan Basin, Yellow Sea","authors":"Kyoung-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Moohee Kang ,&nbsp;Snons Cheong ,&nbsp;Kue-Young Kim ,&nbsp;In-Sun Song ,&nbsp;Kwanghyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2025.107621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We employed a site screening framework to select potential CCS sites within the Early Miocene formations of the eastern Gunsan Basin in the Yellow Sea, offshore South Korea, by incorporating subsurface data. The site screening process, comprising stratigraphic and structural interpretation, gross depositional environment mapping, and common risk segment mapping, revealed three potential areas for CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage: SA1, SA2, and SA3 in the north, center, and south, respectively. SA1 was the most favorable site, considering its substantial sand potential and geologically stable environment. Prospective CO<sub>2</sub> storage resources for SA1 were estimated using geological static modeling and the CO<sub>2</sub>-SCREEN tool, yielding a best estimate (P50) in the range of 420–459 MtCO<sub>2</sub>. Pressure-constrained storage resource was also evaluated using EASiTool V5.0, which accounts for realistic injectivity and operational limitations, resulting in a more conservative P50 estimate of 91.9 MtCO<sub>2</sub>. This study highlights significant potential for CO<sub>2</sub> storage in the Early Miocene formation of the eastern Gunsan Basin, to secure additional CO<sub>2</sub> storage resources and achieve the 2030 nationally determined contribution and 2050 net zero greenhouse gas emission targets. The applied site screening framework can serve as a transferable approach for evaluating CO<sub>2</sub> storage in offshore basins globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18189,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Petroleum Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225003381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We employed a site screening framework to select potential CCS sites within the Early Miocene formations of the eastern Gunsan Basin in the Yellow Sea, offshore South Korea, by incorporating subsurface data. The site screening process, comprising stratigraphic and structural interpretation, gross depositional environment mapping, and common risk segment mapping, revealed three potential areas for CO2 geological storage: SA1, SA2, and SA3 in the north, center, and south, respectively. SA1 was the most favorable site, considering its substantial sand potential and geologically stable environment. Prospective CO2 storage resources for SA1 were estimated using geological static modeling and the CO2-SCREEN tool, yielding a best estimate (P50) in the range of 420–459 MtCO2. Pressure-constrained storage resource was also evaluated using EASiTool V5.0, which accounts for realistic injectivity and operational limitations, resulting in a more conservative P50 estimate of 91.9 MtCO2. This study highlights significant potential for CO2 storage in the Early Miocene formation of the eastern Gunsan Basin, to secure additional CO2 storage resources and achieve the 2030 nationally determined contribution and 2050 net zero greenhouse gas emission targets. The applied site screening framework can serve as a transferable approach for evaluating CO2 storage in offshore basins globally.
黄海群山盆地东部早中新世近海CO2储层综合选址
我们采用了一个地点筛选框架,通过结合地下数据,在韩国黄海群山盆地东部早中新世地层中选择潜在的CCS地点。通过地层和构造解释、总沉积环境填图和共同风险段填图,在现场筛选过程中发现了三个潜在的CO2地质封存区,分别位于北部、中部和南部的SA1、SA2和SA3。沙1区含沙潜力大,地质环境稳定,是最有利的选址。利用地质静态建模和CO2- screen工具对SA1的潜在CO2储存资源进行了估计,得出的最佳估计(P50)在4.2 - 4.59亿吨CO2范围内。使用EASiTool V5.0对压力受限的存储资源进行了评估,该工具考虑了实际的注入能力和操作限制,得出了更保守的P50估计为9190万吨co2。这项研究强调了群山盆地东部早中新世地层中二氧化碳储存的巨大潜力,以确保额外的二氧化碳储存资源,实现2030年国家自主贡献和2050年温室气体净零排放的目标。所应用的场地筛选框架可以作为评估全球近海盆地二氧化碳储存的可转移方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine and Petroleum Geology
Marine and Petroleum Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
475
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Marine and Petroleum Geology is the pre-eminent international forum for the exchange of multidisciplinary concepts, interpretations and techniques for all concerned with marine and petroleum geology in industry, government and academia. Rapid bimonthly publication allows early communications of papers or short communications to the geoscience community. Marine and Petroleum Geology is essential reading for geologists, geophysicists and explorationists in industry, government and academia working in the following areas: marine geology; basin analysis and evaluation; organic geochemistry; reserve/resource estimation; seismic stratigraphy; thermal models of basic evolution; sedimentary geology; continental margins; geophysical interpretation; structural geology/tectonics; formation evaluation techniques; well logging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信