Effects of land-use change on soil total carbon pool: a meta-analysis

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhuobing Ren , Changjia Li , Shuai Wang , Wenxin Zhou , Lindsay C. Stringer , Bojie Fu
{"title":"Effects of land-use change on soil total carbon pool: a meta-analysis","authors":"Zhuobing Ren ,&nbsp;Changjia Li ,&nbsp;Shuai Wang ,&nbsp;Wenxin Zhou ,&nbsp;Lindsay C. Stringer ,&nbsp;Bojie Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.110021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil carbon is crucial for plant growth, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem functions as it provides essential nutrients and improves soil structure. Land-use change is widely recognized to have a profound effect on the soil carbon pool. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the global response of soil total carbon, which includes both organic and inorganic carbon, to such changes. Here, we present a thorough assessment of the impact of land-use change on soil total carbon through a pairwise comparative meta-analysis of 1033 paired observations from 73 sites across six continents. These sites cover six major land-use changes: forest to cropland (FC), grassland to cropland (GC), cropland to forest (CF), cropland to grassland (CG), sandy land to forest (SF), and grassland to forest (GF). Contrary to expectations, FC and GC were not found to have a significant adverse effect on soil total carbon (lnRR<sub>++</sub> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, restoration from CF and CG did not result in the anticipated significant increase in soil total carbon (lnRR<sub>++</sub> ∼0.08), largely due to the offsetting effects of organic and inorganic carbon. Afforestation in sandy land (SF) significantly increased soil total carbon, whereas its impact on grasslands (GF) was not significant. The effects of SF and FC on soil total carbon become more pronounced with higher precipitation levels. Conversely, the effect of CF on soil total carbon diminishes with rising temperatures. Additionally, the impact of GC and CG on total carbon increased with both the depth and duration of the change. These findings underscore the complexity of soil total carbon responses to various land-use changes and environmental factors, and highlight the necessity of incorporating soil total carbon assessments in carbon storage evaluations and land-use change modelling, particularly in the context of intensifying climate change and human activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 110021"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925005535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil carbon is crucial for plant growth, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem functions as it provides essential nutrients and improves soil structure. Land-use change is widely recognized to have a profound effect on the soil carbon pool. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the global response of soil total carbon, which includes both organic and inorganic carbon, to such changes. Here, we present a thorough assessment of the impact of land-use change on soil total carbon through a pairwise comparative meta-analysis of 1033 paired observations from 73 sites across six continents. These sites cover six major land-use changes: forest to cropland (FC), grassland to cropland (GC), cropland to forest (CF), cropland to grassland (CG), sandy land to forest (SF), and grassland to forest (GF). Contrary to expectations, FC and GC were not found to have a significant adverse effect on soil total carbon (lnRR++ < 0.05). Similarly, restoration from CF and CG did not result in the anticipated significant increase in soil total carbon (lnRR++ ∼0.08), largely due to the offsetting effects of organic and inorganic carbon. Afforestation in sandy land (SF) significantly increased soil total carbon, whereas its impact on grasslands (GF) was not significant. The effects of SF and FC on soil total carbon become more pronounced with higher precipitation levels. Conversely, the effect of CF on soil total carbon diminishes with rising temperatures. Additionally, the impact of GC and CG on total carbon increased with both the depth and duration of the change. These findings underscore the complexity of soil total carbon responses to various land-use changes and environmental factors, and highlight the necessity of incorporating soil total carbon assessments in carbon storage evaluations and land-use change modelling, particularly in the context of intensifying climate change and human activities.
土地利用变化对土壤总碳库影响的meta分析
土壤碳对植物生长、农业生产力和生态系统功能至关重要,因为它提供必需的营养物质并改善土壤结构。土地利用变化被广泛认为对土壤碳库有深远的影响。然而,全球土壤总碳(包括有机碳和无机碳)对这些变化的响应尚缺乏全面的认识。本文通过对来自六大洲73个站点的1033个成对观测数据进行两两比较荟萃分析,全面评估了土地利用变化对土壤总碳的影响。这些样地涵盖了6种主要的土地利用变化:森林到耕地(FC)、草地到耕地(GC)、农田到森林(CF)、农田到草地(CG)、沙地到森林(SF)和草地到森林(GF)。与预期相反,FC和GC对土壤总碳没有显著的不利影响(lnRR++ < 0.05)。同样,CF和CG的恢复并没有导致预期的土壤总碳的显著增加(lnRR++ ~ 0.08),这主要是由于有机碳和无机碳的抵消作用。沙地造林显著增加了土壤总碳,而草地造林对土壤总碳的影响不显著。随着降水量的增加,土壤总碳的影响也越来越明显。相反,CF对土壤总碳的影响随着温度的升高而减弱。此外,GC和CG对总碳的影响随变化的深度和持续时间而增加。这些发现强调了土壤总碳对各种土地利用变化和环境因子响应的复杂性,并强调了将土壤总碳评估纳入碳储量评估和土地利用变化模型的必要性,特别是在气候变化和人类活动加剧的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信