Differential effects of vegetation types on regional carbon stocks in China: A meta-analysis-based integrated assessment of above-ground and surface soil carbon pools
Guannan Cui , Wenchao Li , Yihao Meng , Liming Dong
{"title":"Differential effects of vegetation types on regional carbon stocks in China: A meta-analysis-based integrated assessment of above-ground and surface soil carbon pools","authors":"Guannan Cui , Wenchao Li , Yihao Meng , Liming Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Chinese terrestrial ecosystems, above-ground carbon (AGC) and surface soil organic carbon (SOC) constitute critical components of vegetation carbon stocks. This study offers a more comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms that influence carbon sequestration. Through a meta-analysis of 173 peer-reviewed studies, the research examined three major natural ecosystems: trees, shrubs, and grasses. Key findings reveal: (1) The trees exhibited the highest carbon sequestration capacity (AGC = 4.73, SOC = 2.34), followed by shrubs (AGC = 1.07, SOC = 2.66) and grasses (AGC = −1.07, SOC = 1.37), with all values compared to control farmland. (2) Regional divergence: Tree AGC was highest in Northeast (13.29) and North China (6.87); Grass AGC was lower than farmland in Inner Mongolia (−7.94), Southeast (−3.56), and Northwest China (−2.21); SOC was most prominent for trees and shrubs in Southwest China (3.77 and 4.48, respectively); Grass SOC peaked in Central China (4.24); Comparative analysis showed tree AGC generally exceeded SOC, while grasses exhibited the opposite pattern; Shrubs demonstrated higher AGC than SOC in northern regions, with the reverse pattern in southern regions. (3) Climatic thresholds: High precipitation (>1500 mm) maximally enhances AGC and SOC capacities for trees and shrubs, with SOC further enhanced at >15 °C; Grasses demonstrate optimal carbon sequestration under moderate conditions (5–15 °C and 1000–1500 mm). These findings emphasize the critical importance of considering vegetation type, regional heterogeneity, and climatic thresholds in developing forest management strategies for enhanced carbon sink optimization. The study provides valuable insights for ecosystem-specific carbon management approaches in China's diverse terrestrial environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452500243X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Chinese terrestrial ecosystems, above-ground carbon (AGC) and surface soil organic carbon (SOC) constitute critical components of vegetation carbon stocks. This study offers a more comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms that influence carbon sequestration. Through a meta-analysis of 173 peer-reviewed studies, the research examined three major natural ecosystems: trees, shrubs, and grasses. Key findings reveal: (1) The trees exhibited the highest carbon sequestration capacity (AGC = 4.73, SOC = 2.34), followed by shrubs (AGC = 1.07, SOC = 2.66) and grasses (AGC = −1.07, SOC = 1.37), with all values compared to control farmland. (2) Regional divergence: Tree AGC was highest in Northeast (13.29) and North China (6.87); Grass AGC was lower than farmland in Inner Mongolia (−7.94), Southeast (−3.56), and Northwest China (−2.21); SOC was most prominent for trees and shrubs in Southwest China (3.77 and 4.48, respectively); Grass SOC peaked in Central China (4.24); Comparative analysis showed tree AGC generally exceeded SOC, while grasses exhibited the opposite pattern; Shrubs demonstrated higher AGC than SOC in northern regions, with the reverse pattern in southern regions. (3) Climatic thresholds: High precipitation (>1500 mm) maximally enhances AGC and SOC capacities for trees and shrubs, with SOC further enhanced at >15 °C; Grasses demonstrate optimal carbon sequestration under moderate conditions (5–15 °C and 1000–1500 mm). These findings emphasize the critical importance of considering vegetation type, regional heterogeneity, and climatic thresholds in developing forest management strategies for enhanced carbon sink optimization. The study provides valuable insights for ecosystem-specific carbon management approaches in China's diverse terrestrial environments.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.