Effects of two different doses of HIFT on physical function, cognitive performance, and quality of life in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial
Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo , Yulieth Rivas-Campo , Carlos Mario Basto-Cardona , David Alejandro Gonzalez-Bustamante , Agustin Aibar-Almazan , Yolanda Castellote-Caballero , Fidel Hita-Contreras , Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz , Yeny Concha-Cisternas
{"title":"Effects of two different doses of HIFT on physical function, cognitive performance, and quality of life in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo , Yulieth Rivas-Campo , Carlos Mario Basto-Cardona , David Alejandro Gonzalez-Bustamante , Agustin Aibar-Almazan , Yolanda Castellote-Caballero , Fidel Hita-Contreras , Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz , Yeny Concha-Cisternas","doi":"10.1016/j.jesf.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background/Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compromises physical and mental function in older adults and increases the risk of dementia. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) is a promising intervention, but the optimal dose-response for improving cognitive and physical outcomes in this population remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 224 older adults (≥65 years) allocated to three groups: high-dose HIFT (4 sessions of 60 min/week), low-dose HIFT (2 sessions of 45 min/week), and control (non-exercise activities). The intervention lasted 12 weeks. Primary outcomes included cognitive function (MAAS, MoCA, TMT A/B, VFAT, DSST), physical fitness (Senior Fitness Test, Tinetti), and quality of life (SF-36, PSQI). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine the time × group interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant time × group interactions were observed for MAAS (F = 20.50; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.005), MoCA (F = 17.40; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.034), TMT A (F = 38.60; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.098), and VFAT (F = 109.00; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.101), with greater improvements in both HIFT groups compared to control. For quality of life, significant interactions were found across all SF-36 dimensions, notably in Vitality (F = 76.20; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.095) and Emotional Role (F = 23.00; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.032). Physical fitness also improved, with significant effects in the 6-Minute Walk Test (F = 29.80; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.108) and 8-Foot Up-and-Go (F = 81.00; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup>G = 0.191).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both high- and low-dose HIFT programs improved cognitive, physical, and quality-of-life outcomes in older adults with MCI. The low-dose intervention achieved similar effects to the high-dose protocol, offering a time-efficient and scalable approach for implementation in clinical and community settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 462-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X25000711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compromises physical and mental function in older adults and increases the risk of dementia. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) is a promising intervention, but the optimal dose-response for improving cognitive and physical outcomes in this population remains unclear.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 224 older adults (≥65 years) allocated to three groups: high-dose HIFT (4 sessions of 60 min/week), low-dose HIFT (2 sessions of 45 min/week), and control (non-exercise activities). The intervention lasted 12 weeks. Primary outcomes included cognitive function (MAAS, MoCA, TMT A/B, VFAT, DSST), physical fitness (Senior Fitness Test, Tinetti), and quality of life (SF-36, PSQI). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine the time × group interaction.
Results
Significant time × group interactions were observed for MAAS (F = 20.50; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.005), MoCA (F = 17.40; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.034), TMT A (F = 38.60; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.098), and VFAT (F = 109.00; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.101), with greater improvements in both HIFT groups compared to control. For quality of life, significant interactions were found across all SF-36 dimensions, notably in Vitality (F = 76.20; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.095) and Emotional Role (F = 23.00; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.032). Physical fitness also improved, with significant effects in the 6-Minute Walk Test (F = 29.80; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.108) and 8-Foot Up-and-Go (F = 81.00; p < 0.001; η2G = 0.191).
Conclusion
Both high- and low-dose HIFT programs improved cognitive, physical, and quality-of-life outcomes in older adults with MCI. The low-dose intervention achieved similar effects to the high-dose protocol, offering a time-efficient and scalable approach for implementation in clinical and community settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness is the official peer-reviewed journal of The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness (SCSEPF), the Physical Fitness Association of Hong Kong, China (HKPFA), and the Hong Kong Association of Sports Medicine and Sports Science (HKASMSS). It is published twice a year, in June and December, by Elsevier.
The Journal accepts original investigations, comprehensive reviews, case studies and short communications on current topics in exercise science, physical fitness and physical education.