Geological and Anthropogenic Factors Jointly Influence Hydrochemical Interactions between Groundwater and Surface Water in the Middle and Lower Yellow River

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-10-12 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.5c03965
Menglei Wang, , , Jie Fang*, , , Feisheng Feng, , , Tingting Yao, , , Yongping Shan, , and , Wanli Su, 
{"title":"Geological and Anthropogenic Factors Jointly Influence Hydrochemical Interactions between Groundwater and Surface Water in the Middle and Lower Yellow River","authors":"Menglei Wang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Jie Fang*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Feisheng Feng,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Tingting Yao,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yongping Shan,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Wanli Su,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c03965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The interaction between groundwater and surface water plays a crucial role in regulating water resource availability and maintaining ecosystem stability, particularly through hydrochemical exchange processes. However, at the regional scale, the driving factors governing hydrochemical interactions between groundwater and surface water remain inadequately understood. This study aims to identify the dominant controlling factors and ion sources influencing hydrochemical interactions in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on the hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater and surface water across China. Ultimately, 150 representative sampling sites located in the middle and lower Yellow River Basin were selected, encompassing 28,351 groundwater samples and 15,487 surface water samples. Sampling was conducted during both the rain and dry seasons, covering different hydrological periods. Hydrochemical characteristics were analyzed by using a combination of hydrogeochemical statistical methods, Piper diagrams, ion ratio relationships, Gibbs plots, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Furthermore, the Absolute Principal Component Scores–Multiple Linear Regression (APCS-MLR) model and PHREEQC geochemical simulations were applied to quantify the contributions of different ion sources and assess mineral dissolution and precipitation processes. The results show that the main ions in groundwater and surface water mainly come from rock weathering, evaporation, and human activities. The dissolution of carbonates and gypsum is the source of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> in groundwater and surface water. In addition, the discharge of industrial wastewater and domestic sewage contributed significantly to Cl<sup>–</sup>, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2–</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>. The K<sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> ions might be due to the application of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers, although contributions from other sources (e.g., sewage, natural mineral dissolution) cannot be excluded. Moreover, the PCA and APCS-MLR analyses indicated that the hydrochemical interactions between groundwater and surface water were predominantly controlled by geological conditions (48.979%), followed by agricultural activities (16.773%), industrial influences (12.276%), and unidentified factors (21.972%). Among these, geological factors and mineral dissolution processes emerged as the most significant controls. Unidentified factors may include unmeasured variables such as atmospheric deposition, localized anthropogenic inputs, or complex groundwater–surface water exchange dynamics not fully captured by the model. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving groundwater–surface water hydrochemical interactions and offer valuable insights for regional water resource management, sustainable utilization, and ecological environment conservation in the Yellow River Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 41","pages":"48034–48050"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c03965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c03965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interaction between groundwater and surface water plays a crucial role in regulating water resource availability and maintaining ecosystem stability, particularly through hydrochemical exchange processes. However, at the regional scale, the driving factors governing hydrochemical interactions between groundwater and surface water remain inadequately understood. This study aims to identify the dominant controlling factors and ion sources influencing hydrochemical interactions in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on the hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater and surface water across China. Ultimately, 150 representative sampling sites located in the middle and lower Yellow River Basin were selected, encompassing 28,351 groundwater samples and 15,487 surface water samples. Sampling was conducted during both the rain and dry seasons, covering different hydrological periods. Hydrochemical characteristics were analyzed by using a combination of hydrogeochemical statistical methods, Piper diagrams, ion ratio relationships, Gibbs plots, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Furthermore, the Absolute Principal Component Scores–Multiple Linear Regression (APCS-MLR) model and PHREEQC geochemical simulations were applied to quantify the contributions of different ion sources and assess mineral dissolution and precipitation processes. The results show that the main ions in groundwater and surface water mainly come from rock weathering, evaporation, and human activities. The dissolution of carbonates and gypsum is the source of Ca2+, Mg2+ and HCO3 in groundwater and surface water. In addition, the discharge of industrial wastewater and domestic sewage contributed significantly to Cl, SO42– and Na+. The K+ and NO3 ions might be due to the application of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers, although contributions from other sources (e.g., sewage, natural mineral dissolution) cannot be excluded. Moreover, the PCA and APCS-MLR analyses indicated that the hydrochemical interactions between groundwater and surface water were predominantly controlled by geological conditions (48.979%), followed by agricultural activities (16.773%), industrial influences (12.276%), and unidentified factors (21.972%). Among these, geological factors and mineral dissolution processes emerged as the most significant controls. Unidentified factors may include unmeasured variables such as atmospheric deposition, localized anthropogenic inputs, or complex groundwater–surface water exchange dynamics not fully captured by the model. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving groundwater–surface water hydrochemical interactions and offer valuable insights for regional water resource management, sustainable utilization, and ecological environment conservation in the Yellow River Basin.

地质和人为因素共同影响黄河中下游地下水与地表水水化学相互作用
地下水和地表水之间的相互作用在调节水资源可用性和维持生态系统稳定方面起着至关重要的作用,特别是通过水化学交换过程。然而,在区域尺度上,控制地下水和地表水之间水化学相互作用的驱动因素仍然没有得到充分的了解。本研究旨在确定黄河中下游水化学相互作用的主导控制因素和离子源。对中国地下水和地表水的水化学特征进行了全面的文献综述。最终选取了黄河中下游地区具有代表性的150个采样点,其中地下水采样28351个,地表水采样15487个。在雨季和旱季都进行了采样,覆盖了不同的水文时期。采用水文地球化学统计方法、Piper图、离子比关系、Gibbs图和主成分分析(PCA)等方法分析了水化学特征。此外,采用绝对主成分分数-多元线性回归(APCS-MLR)模型和PHREEQC地球化学模拟,量化不同离子源的贡献,评估矿物溶解和沉淀过程。结果表明:地下水和地表水中的主要离子主要来源于岩石风化、蒸发和人类活动。碳酸盐岩和石膏的溶解是地下水和地表水中Ca2+、Mg2+和HCO3 -的来源。此外,工业废水和生活污水的排放对Cl -、SO42 -和Na+也有显著贡献。K+和NO3 -离子可能是由于氮肥和钾肥的施用,尽管不能排除其他来源(如污水、天然矿物溶解)的贡献。此外,PCA和APCS-MLR分析表明,地下水与地表水的水化学相互作用主要受地质条件(48.979%)控制,其次是农业活动(16.773%)、工业影响(12.276%)和未知因素(21.972%)。其中,地质因素和矿物溶解作用是最重要的控制因素。未确定的因素可能包括未测量的变量,如大气沉积、局部人为输入或复杂的地下水-地表水交换动态,这些变量未被模式完全捕获。这些研究结果为全面认识地下水-地表水水化学相互作用机理提供了理论依据,为黄河流域区域水资源管理、可持续利用和生态环境保护提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信