Professional autonomy in pharmacists: Independence within interdependence.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Paul Forsyth, Jessica Baker, Willa Saadat, Andrew Radley
{"title":"Professional autonomy in pharmacists: Independence within interdependence.","authors":"Paul Forsyth, Jessica Baker, Willa Saadat, Andrew Radley","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the duties of pharmacists evolve it can be difficult for many to foster and maintain professional autonomy within both new and core roles. However, it is important for us to understand what autonomy actually means. Autonomy is a common word in every-day use describing a philosophical concept concerning an agent's capacity for self-determination. Professional standards typically try to ensure the required level of individual professional autonomy necessary for pharmacists to deliver care in the best interests of patients. Professional autonomy is a key factor in achieving job satisfaction, meaningful work, and flourishing in a professional role, and when inhibited can lead to negative career experiences and outcomes. Autonomy can however be understood both in this individual sense, linked to liberty and independence, but also in a collective sense, linked to relationships and societal empowerment. This paper examines how pharmacists have understood these differing conceptual views of professional autonomy to date, describing the theoretical basis for each, and then sketching a series of short scenarios that illustrate how the professional autonomy of individual pharmacists can be heavily influenced by many interdependent factors, including relational factors, employment factors, professional factors, and societal factors. Finally, the paper considers the principles and skills needed for pharmacists to create a more stable professional autonomy, both individually and collectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the duties of pharmacists evolve it can be difficult for many to foster and maintain professional autonomy within both new and core roles. However, it is important for us to understand what autonomy actually means. Autonomy is a common word in every-day use describing a philosophical concept concerning an agent's capacity for self-determination. Professional standards typically try to ensure the required level of individual professional autonomy necessary for pharmacists to deliver care in the best interests of patients. Professional autonomy is a key factor in achieving job satisfaction, meaningful work, and flourishing in a professional role, and when inhibited can lead to negative career experiences and outcomes. Autonomy can however be understood both in this individual sense, linked to liberty and independence, but also in a collective sense, linked to relationships and societal empowerment. This paper examines how pharmacists have understood these differing conceptual views of professional autonomy to date, describing the theoretical basis for each, and then sketching a series of short scenarios that illustrate how the professional autonomy of individual pharmacists can be heavily influenced by many interdependent factors, including relational factors, employment factors, professional factors, and societal factors. Finally, the paper considers the principles and skills needed for pharmacists to create a more stable professional autonomy, both individually and collectively.

药师的职业自主:相互依存中的独立。
随着药剂师职责的演变,对于许多人来说,在新的和核心的角色中培养和保持专业自主权是很困难的。然而,理解自治的真正含义对我们来说很重要。自治是一个日常使用的常见词汇,描述了一个关于主体自决能力的哲学概念。专业标准通常试图确保药剂师为患者提供最佳利益所必需的个人专业自主水平。职业自主是获得工作满意度、有意义的工作和在职业角色中蓬勃发展的关键因素,当被抑制时,可能会导致负面的职业经历和结果。然而,自治既可以从与自由和独立相关的个人意义上理解,也可以从与关系和社会赋权相关的集体意义上理解。本文考察了迄今为止药剂师如何理解这些不同的专业自主概念观点,描述了每种观点的理论基础,然后勾勒出一系列简短的场景,说明药师个人的专业自主如何受到许多相互依存的因素的严重影响,包括关系因素、就业因素、专业因素和社会因素。最后,本文考虑了药剂师创造更稳定的专业自主权所需的原则和技能,无论是个人还是集体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信