The impact of social media on patient behavior in aesthetic treatments: Decreased influence on patients at a reference center for aesthetic ultrasonography.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Claudia Gonzalez, Juan Luis Martinez-Gonzalez, George Kroumpouzos
{"title":"The impact of social media on patient behavior in aesthetic treatments: Decreased influence on patients at a reference center for aesthetic ultrasonography.","authors":"Claudia Gonzalez, Juan Luis Martinez-Gonzalez, George Kroumpouzos","doi":"10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media (SM) has a significant impact on the public awareness of dermatologic conditions, as well as the perception of beauty and aesthetic pursuits of patients; however, they increase the risk of self-diagnosis and misinterpretation of clinical conditions as aesthetic ones. We discuss the risks of self-diagnosis, including delays in proper diagnosis or complications in treatment due to not seeking specific dermatologic assessment promptly, with tools such as high-resolution ultrasound. We specifically examined how SM influences patient behavior in aesthetic medicine by focusing on a group of patients seeking high-resolution ultrasound for diagnostic or aesthetic reasons at a specialized center for aesthetic ultrasonography. A total of 140 respondents (115 women, or 82.14%) completed a survey assessing their behaviors and attitudes related to SM. Among these, 37 respondents (26.4%) sought ultrasonography for aesthetic-related reasons. Interestingly, 66.43% of the participants reported having minimal or no influence from SM in their decision to undergo an aesthetic procedure, whereas only 19.29% felt moderately or highly influenced by SM. These findings suggest that our group of patients experienced less influence from SM compared with studies conducted on the general population. This difference may be attributed to the fact that most participants were referred by a dermatologist or surgeon, thus their access to dermatologic information was directly influenced by these professionals. Dermatologists should actively counter misinformation in clinical settings by ensuring clear communication to reduce patient misconceptions and educate them about the limitations of SM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10358,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.10.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media (SM) has a significant impact on the public awareness of dermatologic conditions, as well as the perception of beauty and aesthetic pursuits of patients; however, they increase the risk of self-diagnosis and misinterpretation of clinical conditions as aesthetic ones. We discuss the risks of self-diagnosis, including delays in proper diagnosis or complications in treatment due to not seeking specific dermatologic assessment promptly, with tools such as high-resolution ultrasound. We specifically examined how SM influences patient behavior in aesthetic medicine by focusing on a group of patients seeking high-resolution ultrasound for diagnostic or aesthetic reasons at a specialized center for aesthetic ultrasonography. A total of 140 respondents (115 women, or 82.14%) completed a survey assessing their behaviors and attitudes related to SM. Among these, 37 respondents (26.4%) sought ultrasonography for aesthetic-related reasons. Interestingly, 66.43% of the participants reported having minimal or no influence from SM in their decision to undergo an aesthetic procedure, whereas only 19.29% felt moderately or highly influenced by SM. These findings suggest that our group of patients experienced less influence from SM compared with studies conducted on the general population. This difference may be attributed to the fact that most participants were referred by a dermatologist or surgeon, thus their access to dermatologic information was directly influenced by these professionals. Dermatologists should actively counter misinformation in clinical settings by ensuring clear communication to reduce patient misconceptions and educate them about the limitations of SM.

社交媒体对美容治疗中患者行为的影响:在美容超声检查参考中心对患者的影响降低。
社交媒体(SM)对公众对皮肤病的认识,以及患者对美的感知和审美追求产生了重大影响;然而,它们增加了自我诊断的风险,并将临床状况误解为审美问题。我们讨论了自我诊断的风险,包括由于没有及时寻求特定的皮肤病学评估而导致的正确诊断的延误或治疗的并发症,如高分辨率超声。我们专门研究了SM如何影响患者在美容医学中的行为,通过关注一组在美容超声检查专业中心寻求高分辨率超声诊断或美学原因的患者。共有140名受访者(115名女性,占82.14%)完成了一项评估他们与SM相关的行为和态度的调查。其中,37人(26.4%)因美观原因寻求超声检查。有趣的是,66.43%的参与者报告SM对他们决定接受美容手术的影响很小或没有影响,而只有19.29%的人认为SM对他们的影响中等或高度。这些发现表明,与在一般人群中进行的研究相比,我们的患者组受到SM的影响较小。这种差异可能是由于大多数参与者是由皮肤科医生或外科医生介绍的,因此他们对皮肤科信息的获取直接受到这些专业人士的影响。皮肤科医生应积极应对临床环境中的错误信息,确保清晰的沟通,以减少患者的误解,并教育他们SM的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics in dermatology
Clinics in dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
106
审稿时长
3 days
期刊介绍: Clinics in Dermatology brings you the most practical and comprehensive information on the treatment and care of skin disorders. Each issue features a Guest Editor and is devoted to a single timely topic relating to clinical dermatology. Clinics in Dermatology provides information that is... • Clinically oriented -- from evaluation to treatment, Clinics in Dermatology covers what is most relevant to you in your practice. • Authoritative -- world-renowned experts in the field assure the high-quality and currency of each issue by reporting on their areas of expertise. • Well-illustrated -- each issue is complete with photos, drawings and diagrams to illustrate points and demonstrate techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信