Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents and Drug-Coated Balloons in Lesion with Eruptive Calcified Nodules.
Masahiro Koide, Kan Zen, Tomotsugu Seki, Kento Fukui, Kazuaki Takamatsu, Jun Shiraishi, Satoaki Matoba
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents and Drug-Coated Balloons in Lesion with Eruptive Calcified Nodules.","authors":"Masahiro Koide, Kan Zen, Tomotsugu Seki, Kento Fukui, Kazuaki Takamatsu, Jun Shiraishi, Satoaki Matoba","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eruptive calcified nodules (ECN) represent a distinct and high-risk plaque morphology implicated in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome. While prior studies have reported poor clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCB) for these lesions, comparative data evaluating the efficacy of DES versus DCB therapy remains unavailable. Among 1,975 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI for de novo coronary lesions, 68 patients (75 lesions) were identified with OCT-confirmed ECN. These lesions were retrospectively analyzed and stratified into either the DES group (45 lesions in 41 patients) or the DCB group (30 lesions in 27 patients). The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and cardiac death. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in CD-TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-3.2; p = 0.6) and cardiac death (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.9; p = 0.5). These findings remained consistent after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that PCI with either DES or DCB for OCT-identified ECN results in similarly poor clinical outcomes, highlighting the limitations of current PCI devices for these rare, unstable lesions and emphasizing the need for alternative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.10.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eruptive calcified nodules (ECN) represent a distinct and high-risk plaque morphology implicated in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome. While prior studies have reported poor clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCB) for these lesions, comparative data evaluating the efficacy of DES versus DCB therapy remains unavailable. Among 1,975 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI for de novo coronary lesions, 68 patients (75 lesions) were identified with OCT-confirmed ECN. These lesions were retrospectively analyzed and stratified into either the DES group (45 lesions in 41 patients) or the DCB group (30 lesions in 27 patients). The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and cardiac death. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in CD-TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-3.2; p = 0.6) and cardiac death (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.9; p = 0.5). These findings remained consistent after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that PCI with either DES or DCB for OCT-identified ECN results in similarly poor clinical outcomes, highlighting the limitations of current PCI devices for these rare, unstable lesions and emphasizing the need for alternative therapies.
爆发性钙化结节(ECN)是一种独特的高风险斑块形态,与急性冠状动脉综合征的发病机制有关。虽然先前的研究报告了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)使用药物洗脱支架(DES)或药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗这些病变的临床结果较差,但评估DES与DCB治疗效果的比较数据仍然缺乏。在1975名接受光学相干断层扫描(OCT)引导的冠状动脉新发病变PCI治疗的患者中,68名患者(75个病变)被OCT证实为ECN。回顾性分析这些病变并将其分为DES组(41例患者中45个病变)或DCB组(27例患者中30个病变)。主要终点是临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术(CD-TLR)和心源性死亡。在中位随访2.1年期间,两组在CD-TLR(风险比[HR] 1.2; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.5-3.2; p = 0.6)和心源性死亡(HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3-1.9; p = 0.5)方面无显著差异。在调整基线临床特征后,这些发现保持一致。总之,本研究表明,对于oct识别的ECN,采用DES或DCB进行PCI治疗的临床结果同样很差,突出了目前PCI设备对这些罕见、不稳定病变的局限性,并强调了替代治疗的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.