Urban Informality, Housing Insecurity and “Bulldozer Urbanism” in Global South Cities: Evidence From Selected Slum Communities in Accra, Ghana

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Reforce Okwei, Elmond Bandauko, Desmond Adjaison, Lina Adeetuk, Thelma Akyea, Godwin Arku
{"title":"Urban Informality, Housing Insecurity and “Bulldozer Urbanism” in Global South Cities: Evidence From Selected Slum Communities in Accra, Ghana","authors":"Reforce Okwei,&nbsp;Elmond Bandauko,&nbsp;Desmond Adjaison,&nbsp;Lina Adeetuk,&nbsp;Thelma Akyea,&nbsp;Godwin Arku","doi":"10.1111/grow.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Accra, state-led eviction mirrors ongoing processes of socio-spatial inequality and exclusion. While evictions are rooted in neoliberal ideals, the outcomes of such processes have been particularly devastating for residents of slums and informal settlements. This paper uses Cernea's Risk and Reconstruction Model to examine the impacts of bulldozer urbanism on three selected slum communities in Accra. Bulldozer urbanism is rationalized by municipal authorities as an approach to sanitize urban environments by removing what is perceived as filth, dirt, and a looming environmental hazard. While Cernea's model was valuable in uncovering the multiple impacts of evictions on our study communities, the findings reveal outcomes that extend beyond its scope by situating the findings within the broader discussion of state power, neoliberal governance, and urban dispossession. The paper highlights the urgent need for policymakers to embrace and recognize slums and informal communities as integral contributors rather than obstacles to urban development. Based on the findings, the study advocates for a shift from “bulldozing” to upholding the housing rights of slum dwellers as an important step for realizing just, equitable and inclusive cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grow.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Accra, state-led eviction mirrors ongoing processes of socio-spatial inequality and exclusion. While evictions are rooted in neoliberal ideals, the outcomes of such processes have been particularly devastating for residents of slums and informal settlements. This paper uses Cernea's Risk and Reconstruction Model to examine the impacts of bulldozer urbanism on three selected slum communities in Accra. Bulldozer urbanism is rationalized by municipal authorities as an approach to sanitize urban environments by removing what is perceived as filth, dirt, and a looming environmental hazard. While Cernea's model was valuable in uncovering the multiple impacts of evictions on our study communities, the findings reveal outcomes that extend beyond its scope by situating the findings within the broader discussion of state power, neoliberal governance, and urban dispossession. The paper highlights the urgent need for policymakers to embrace and recognize slums and informal communities as integral contributors rather than obstacles to urban development. Based on the findings, the study advocates for a shift from “bulldozing” to upholding the housing rights of slum dwellers as an important step for realizing just, equitable and inclusive cities.

Abstract Image

全球南方城市的城市非正式性、住房不安全感和“推土机式城市主义”:来自加纳阿克拉贫民窟社区的证据
在阿克拉,国家主导的驱逐反映了社会空间不平等和排斥的持续进程。虽然驱逐植根于新自由主义理想,但这种过程的结果对贫民窟和非正式定居点的居民来说尤其具有破坏性。本文采用Cernea的风险与重建模型,考察了推土机城市化对阿克拉三个贫民窟社区的影响。推土机城市主义被市政当局合理化,作为一种通过清除被认为是污秽、污垢和迫在眉睫的环境危害来净化城市环境的方法。虽然Cernea的模型在揭示驱逐对我们研究社区的多重影响方面很有价值,但研究结果显示,通过将研究结果置于国家权力、新自由主义治理和城市强占的更广泛讨论中,结果超出了其范围。报告强调,决策者迫切需要接受并认识到贫民窟和非正式社区是城市发展不可或缺的贡献者,而不是障碍。根据调查结果,该研究主张从“推平”转向维护贫民窟居民的住房权利,这是实现公正、公平和包容城市的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信