Hydrological Fluxes From a Drained Tropical Peatland: Evapotranspiration Consistent Despite Large Fluctuations in Precipitation and Soil Moisture

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Sarah Treby, Charuni Jayasekara, Nafila Izazaya Idrus, Sopa Nindia Ati Ningsih, Laura L. B. Graham, Lindsay B. Hutley, Jason Beringer, Samantha Grover
{"title":"Hydrological Fluxes From a Drained Tropical Peatland: Evapotranspiration Consistent Despite Large Fluctuations in Precipitation and Soil Moisture","authors":"Sarah Treby,&nbsp;Charuni Jayasekara,&nbsp;Nafila Izazaya Idrus,&nbsp;Sopa Nindia Ati Ningsih,&nbsp;Laura L. B. Graham,&nbsp;Lindsay B. Hutley,&nbsp;Jason Beringer,&nbsp;Samantha Grover","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Tropical peatlands play a critical role in regional water cycling, yet most tropical peat swamp forests (PSFs) are anthropogenically disturbed through modification of the water table (e.g., drainage), deforestation, and fire events. These disturbances can alter ecosystem processes including evapotranspiration (ET), thereby creating feedbacks that degrade peatland ecosystem services and result in significant alteration of greenhouse gas budgets. However, our understanding of fine-scale hydrological fluxes in tropical peatland ecosystems is currently limited. Here, therefore, we aimed to quantify rates of ET from a degraded tropical PSF in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, in the context of broader peatland hydrology and site meteorology. From March to November 2020, ET ranged from 1.8 to 7.3 mm d<sup>−1</sup>, averaged 4.1 ± 0.1 mm d<sup>−1</sup> and was consistent between months, despite large fluctuations in precipitation (P) following typical wet/dry seasonality (e.g., 4.1 ± 0.2 mm d<sup>−1</sup> in July, compared to 17.5 ± 4.4 mm d<sup>−1</sup> in April). Total ET over the nine-month study period was 1127 mm; approximately 37% of total precipitation. Daily ET rates were comparable to previous studies from tropical PSFs; however, the ratio of ET/P was lower than other tropical PSF sites. We suggest that the volume of water lost through canal drainage may be higher at this site than other tropical PSFs, indicating more substantial hydrological alteration through drainage. We expect that with continued hydrological restoration (i.e., canal blocking), ET/P may increase and recommend that this data contributes to a long-term baseline from which restoration outcomes can be measured.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical peatlands play a critical role in regional water cycling, yet most tropical peat swamp forests (PSFs) are anthropogenically disturbed through modification of the water table (e.g., drainage), deforestation, and fire events. These disturbances can alter ecosystem processes including evapotranspiration (ET), thereby creating feedbacks that degrade peatland ecosystem services and result in significant alteration of greenhouse gas budgets. However, our understanding of fine-scale hydrological fluxes in tropical peatland ecosystems is currently limited. Here, therefore, we aimed to quantify rates of ET from a degraded tropical PSF in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, in the context of broader peatland hydrology and site meteorology. From March to November 2020, ET ranged from 1.8 to 7.3 mm d−1, averaged 4.1 ± 0.1 mm d−1 and was consistent between months, despite large fluctuations in precipitation (P) following typical wet/dry seasonality (e.g., 4.1 ± 0.2 mm d−1 in July, compared to 17.5 ± 4.4 mm d−1 in April). Total ET over the nine-month study period was 1127 mm; approximately 37% of total precipitation. Daily ET rates were comparable to previous studies from tropical PSFs; however, the ratio of ET/P was lower than other tropical PSF sites. We suggest that the volume of water lost through canal drainage may be higher at this site than other tropical PSFs, indicating more substantial hydrological alteration through drainage. We expect that with continued hydrological restoration (i.e., canal blocking), ET/P may increase and recommend that this data contributes to a long-term baseline from which restoration outcomes can be measured.

Abstract Image

来自排水的热带泥炭地的水文通量:尽管降水和土壤湿度有很大波动,但蒸散发是一致的
热带泥炭地在区域水循环中发挥着关键作用,但大多数热带泥炭沼泽森林(PSFs)受到人为干扰,包括地下水位的改变(如排水)、森林砍伐和火灾事件。这些干扰可以改变包括蒸散发(ET)在内的生态系统过程,从而产生反馈,降低泥炭地生态系统服务并导致温室气体收支的重大变化。然而,我们对热带泥炭地生态系统的精细尺度水文通量的了解目前有限。因此,在这里,我们的目标是在更广泛的泥炭地水文和现场气象学的背景下,量化印度尼西亚加里曼丹中部退化的热带PSF的ET率。从2020年3月至11月,ET的变化范围为1.8至7.3 mm d - 1,平均为4.1±0.1 mm d - 1,在不同月份之间保持一致,尽管降水(P)在典型的湿/干季节之后出现了较大波动(例如,7月为4.1±0.2 mm d - 1,而4月为17.5±4.4 mm d - 1)。9个月的研究期间总ET为1127 mm;约占总降水量的37%。日蒸散发率与以前对热带psf的研究相当;ET/P比值低于其他热带PSF站点。我们认为,通过运河排水损失的水量可能比其他热带PSFs更高,表明通过排水产生的水文变化更大。我们预计,随着持续的水文恢复(即运河阻塞),ET/P可能会增加,并建议这些数据有助于建立一个长期基线,以衡量恢复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信