Yohanna Villalobos, Josep G. Canadell, Elizabeth D. Keller, Peter R. Briggs, Phillip Ford, Ian N. Harman, Timothy W. Hilton, Allison Hogikyan, Ronny Lauerwald, Damien T. Maher, Adrien Martinez, Naiqing Pan, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Marielle Saunois, Hanqin Tian, Jacob Yeo, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"Methane and Nitrous Oxide Budgets for Australasia: A Regional Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Sinks","authors":"Yohanna Villalobos, Josep G. Canadell, Elizabeth D. Keller, Peter R. Briggs, Phillip Ford, Ian N. Harman, Timothy W. Hilton, Allison Hogikyan, Ronny Lauerwald, Damien T. Maher, Adrien Martinez, Naiqing Pan, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Marielle Saunois, Hanqin Tian, Jacob Yeo, Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present the CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom-up and top-down methods, in line with the RECCAP-2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom-up CH<sub>4</sub> budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom-up N<sub>2</sub>O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>, with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top-down CH<sub>4</sub> (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and N<sub>2</sub>O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>) differ in magnitude from the bottom-up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N<sub>2</sub>O, where the bottom-up estimate is 71% higher than the top-down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom-up natural wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical-climate feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008484","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present the CH4 and N2O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom-up and top-down methods, in line with the RECCAP-2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom-up CH4 budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH4 yr−1, with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH4 emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom-up N2O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N2O yr−1, with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top-down CH4 (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH4 yr−1) and N2O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N2O yr−1) differ in magnitude from the bottom-up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N2O, where the bottom-up estimate is 71% higher than the top-down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom-up natural wetland CH4 emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N2O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical-climate feedback.
期刊介绍:
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.