Ripan Ghosh, Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, Sandipta Debanshi, Surajit Let, Manabendra Let, Priyanka Das, Swapan Talukdar, Susanta Mahato, Swades Pal
{"title":"Impact of channel bottlenecking and anthropogeomorphic interventions on flood and wetland conditions in the lower gangetic floodplain","authors":"Ripan Ghosh, Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, Sandipta Debanshi, Surajit Let, Manabendra Let, Priyanka Das, Swapan Talukdar, Susanta Mahato, Swades Pal","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12616-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study investigates the role of channel bottlenecking and anthropogenic interventions in shaping flood dynamics and influencing floodplain wetland sustainability in the moribund deltaic Ganges floodplain, India. The primary objective is to evaluate how channel bottlenecking, embankment construction, damming, source closure of avulsed channels, and urban-induced channel constriction affect flood magnitude, frequency, duration, and wetland transformation. To achieve this, extensive field-based measurements of channel morphology and flood characteristics were conducted, complemented by advanced machine learning (ML) techniques for flood susceptibility mapping. The sensitivity of spatial flood susceptibility to bottlenecking and embankment parameters was quantified, while the effects of damming were examined using downstream water level data. Results show that the convergence of multiple rivers (Mayurakshi, Kuya, Mor, Banki, and Dwarka) within a small low-lying area has created a highly flood-prone setting. Among the applied ML algorithms, the Random Forest (RF) model has demonstrated the highest predictive performance for flood susceptibility mapping. Channel bottlenecking in the confluence segment has substantially increased flood magnitude, expanding the area of extreme flood susceptibility from 7.22 to 84.35 km<sup>2</sup>. Conversely, embankment installation has enhanced the river’s carrying capacity from 53 to 88% reducing the extreme flood-susceptible area to 3.39 km<sup>2</sup>. Damming has decreased downstream water levels by 6–38%, while source closure of avulsed channel has reduced flood frequency, duration, and depth. In contrast, urbanization-induced channel constriction has exacerbated flood risk. However, certain flood mitigation measures have disrupted hydrological connectivity between rivers and floodplain wetlands, accelerating wetland degradation and transformation. By integrating field-driven channel morphological parameters with hydrological modifications such as bottlenecking, embanking, and damming into the ML-based modelling framework, this study provides a novel and comprehensive assessment of flood dynamics and wetland sustainability in a floodplain environment. The findings particularly, measured sensitivity of bottlenecking and embanking river offer valuable insights for revisiting current flood management policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12616-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study investigates the role of channel bottlenecking and anthropogenic interventions in shaping flood dynamics and influencing floodplain wetland sustainability in the moribund deltaic Ganges floodplain, India. The primary objective is to evaluate how channel bottlenecking, embankment construction, damming, source closure of avulsed channels, and urban-induced channel constriction affect flood magnitude, frequency, duration, and wetland transformation. To achieve this, extensive field-based measurements of channel morphology and flood characteristics were conducted, complemented by advanced machine learning (ML) techniques for flood susceptibility mapping. The sensitivity of spatial flood susceptibility to bottlenecking and embankment parameters was quantified, while the effects of damming were examined using downstream water level data. Results show that the convergence of multiple rivers (Mayurakshi, Kuya, Mor, Banki, and Dwarka) within a small low-lying area has created a highly flood-prone setting. Among the applied ML algorithms, the Random Forest (RF) model has demonstrated the highest predictive performance for flood susceptibility mapping. Channel bottlenecking in the confluence segment has substantially increased flood magnitude, expanding the area of extreme flood susceptibility from 7.22 to 84.35 km2. Conversely, embankment installation has enhanced the river’s carrying capacity from 53 to 88% reducing the extreme flood-susceptible area to 3.39 km2. Damming has decreased downstream water levels by 6–38%, while source closure of avulsed channel has reduced flood frequency, duration, and depth. In contrast, urbanization-induced channel constriction has exacerbated flood risk. However, certain flood mitigation measures have disrupted hydrological connectivity between rivers and floodplain wetlands, accelerating wetland degradation and transformation. By integrating field-driven channel morphological parameters with hydrological modifications such as bottlenecking, embanking, and damming into the ML-based modelling framework, this study provides a novel and comprehensive assessment of flood dynamics and wetland sustainability in a floodplain environment. The findings particularly, measured sensitivity of bottlenecking and embanking river offer valuable insights for revisiting current flood management policies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.