Impact of channel bottlenecking and anthropogeomorphic interventions on flood and wetland conditions in the lower gangetic floodplain

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ripan Ghosh, Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, Sandipta Debanshi, Surajit Let, Manabendra Let, Priyanka Das, Swapan Talukdar, Susanta Mahato, Swades Pal
{"title":"Impact of channel bottlenecking and anthropogeomorphic interventions on flood and wetland conditions in the lower gangetic floodplain","authors":"Ripan Ghosh,&nbsp;Sutapa Mukhopadhyay,&nbsp;Sandipta Debanshi,&nbsp;Surajit Let,&nbsp;Manabendra Let,&nbsp;Priyanka Das,&nbsp;Swapan Talukdar,&nbsp;Susanta Mahato,&nbsp;Swades Pal","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12616-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study investigates the role of channel bottlenecking and anthropogenic interventions in shaping flood dynamics and influencing floodplain wetland sustainability in the moribund deltaic Ganges floodplain, India. The primary objective is to evaluate how channel bottlenecking, embankment construction, damming, source closure of avulsed channels, and urban-induced channel constriction affect flood magnitude, frequency, duration, and wetland transformation. To achieve this, extensive field-based measurements of channel morphology and flood characteristics were conducted, complemented by advanced machine learning (ML) techniques for flood susceptibility mapping. The sensitivity of spatial flood susceptibility to bottlenecking and embankment parameters was quantified, while the effects of damming were examined using downstream water level data. Results show that the convergence of multiple rivers (Mayurakshi, Kuya, Mor, Banki, and Dwarka) within a small low-lying area has created a highly flood-prone setting. Among the applied ML algorithms, the Random Forest (RF) model has demonstrated the highest predictive performance for flood susceptibility mapping. Channel bottlenecking in the confluence segment has substantially increased flood magnitude, expanding the area of extreme flood susceptibility from 7.22 to 84.35 km<sup>2</sup>. Conversely, embankment installation has enhanced the river’s carrying capacity from 53 to 88% reducing the extreme flood-susceptible area to 3.39 km<sup>2</sup>. Damming has decreased downstream water levels by 6–38%, while source closure of avulsed channel has reduced flood frequency, duration, and depth. In contrast, urbanization-induced channel constriction has exacerbated flood risk. However, certain flood mitigation measures have disrupted hydrological connectivity between rivers and floodplain wetlands, accelerating wetland degradation and transformation. By integrating field-driven channel morphological parameters with hydrological modifications such as bottlenecking, embanking, and damming into the ML-based modelling framework, this study provides a novel and comprehensive assessment of flood dynamics and wetland sustainability in a floodplain environment. The findings particularly, measured sensitivity of bottlenecking and embanking river offer valuable insights for revisiting current flood management policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12616-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the role of channel bottlenecking and anthropogenic interventions in shaping flood dynamics and influencing floodplain wetland sustainability in the moribund deltaic Ganges floodplain, India. The primary objective is to evaluate how channel bottlenecking, embankment construction, damming, source closure of avulsed channels, and urban-induced channel constriction affect flood magnitude, frequency, duration, and wetland transformation. To achieve this, extensive field-based measurements of channel morphology and flood characteristics were conducted, complemented by advanced machine learning (ML) techniques for flood susceptibility mapping. The sensitivity of spatial flood susceptibility to bottlenecking and embankment parameters was quantified, while the effects of damming were examined using downstream water level data. Results show that the convergence of multiple rivers (Mayurakshi, Kuya, Mor, Banki, and Dwarka) within a small low-lying area has created a highly flood-prone setting. Among the applied ML algorithms, the Random Forest (RF) model has demonstrated the highest predictive performance for flood susceptibility mapping. Channel bottlenecking in the confluence segment has substantially increased flood magnitude, expanding the area of extreme flood susceptibility from 7.22 to 84.35 km2. Conversely, embankment installation has enhanced the river’s carrying capacity from 53 to 88% reducing the extreme flood-susceptible area to 3.39 km2. Damming has decreased downstream water levels by 6–38%, while source closure of avulsed channel has reduced flood frequency, duration, and depth. In contrast, urbanization-induced channel constriction has exacerbated flood risk. However, certain flood mitigation measures have disrupted hydrological connectivity between rivers and floodplain wetlands, accelerating wetland degradation and transformation. By integrating field-driven channel morphological parameters with hydrological modifications such as bottlenecking, embanking, and damming into the ML-based modelling framework, this study provides a novel and comprehensive assessment of flood dynamics and wetland sustainability in a floodplain environment. The findings particularly, measured sensitivity of bottlenecking and embanking river offer valuable insights for revisiting current flood management policies.

Abstract Image

河道瓶颈和人为地貌干预对下游恒河漫滩洪水和湿地条件的影响
本研究在印度濒临死亡的恒河三角洲漫滩研究了河道瓶颈和人为干预在形成洪水动态和影响漫滩湿地可持续性中的作用。主要目的是评估河道瓶颈、堤防建设、筑坝、溃决河道的源头关闭和城市引发的河道收缩如何影响洪水的强度、频率、持续时间和湿地的转变。为了实现这一目标,进行了广泛的基于现场的河道形态和洪水特征测量,并辅以先进的机器学习(ML)技术进行洪水敏感性绘图。量化了空间洪水易感性对瓶颈和堤防参数的敏感性,并利用下游水位数据考察了筑坝的影响。结果表明,多条河流(Mayurakshi、Kuya、Mor、Banki和Dwarka)在一个小的低洼地区汇合,形成了一个高度易发洪水的环境。在应用的ML算法中,随机森林(RF)模型对洪水敏感性映射的预测性能最高。汇流段的河道瓶颈使洪水的震级大幅增加,极端洪水易感区面积从7.22 km2扩大到84.35 km2。相反,堤防建设将河流的承载能力从53%提高到88%,将极端洪水易感区域减少到3.39平方公里。筑坝使下游水位降低了6-38%,而淤积河道的源头关闭减少了洪水发生的频率、持续时间和深度。相比之下,城市化引发的河道收缩加剧了洪水风险。然而,某些防洪措施破坏了河流与洪泛区湿地之间的水文连通性,加速了湿地的退化和转变。通过将野外驱动的河道形态参数与水文变化(如瓶颈、堤防和筑坝)整合到基于ml的建模框架中,本研究提供了一种新的、全面的洪泛平原环境中洪水动态和湿地可持续性评估。研究结果,特别是测量的瓶颈和堤防河流的敏感性,为重新审视当前的洪水管理政策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信