Finite Element Simulation Study on the Applicability of Thermal Imaging for Detecting Voids Defects in Prestressed Pipes of Bridges Under Hydration Heat Excitation

IF 2.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Shengli Li, Kai Zhang, Xing Gao, Pengfei Zheng, Can Cui, Yao Lu, Jiahui Ren
{"title":"Finite Element Simulation Study on the Applicability of Thermal Imaging for Detecting Voids Defects in Prestressed Pipes of Bridges Under Hydration Heat Excitation","authors":"Shengli Li,&nbsp;Kai Zhang,&nbsp;Xing Gao,&nbsp;Pengfei Zheng,&nbsp;Can Cui,&nbsp;Yao Lu,&nbsp;Jiahui Ren","doi":"10.1007/s10921-025-01284-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing infrared thermography detection of cavitation defects in external prestressed pipelines is characterised by a variety of test conditions, making it difficult to explore the applicable conditions thoroughly by experiment. To address this issue, key parameters for the numerical model of hydration heat transfer in grouting material for prestressed pipes were established through the fitting of simulation experiments and field experiments. Subsequently, simulation models were constructed under various conditions to investigate the factors affecting the detection of void defects using infrared thermal imaging, including the presence or absence of steel strands, the size of void defects, the material of the pipeline, and its wall thickness. Our results demonstrate that the presence of steel strands reduces the defect identification capability, with the maximum contrast (MaxΔT) decreasing by 1.117℃ in high polyethylene (HDPE) pipes with a 100% void area. Galvanized steel (GSP) pipes are more difficult to detect than HDPE pipes due to their lower emissivity, particularly in the case of GSP pipes with a 60% void area, where MaxΔT is reduced by 18.96% compared to HDPE pipes. As the size of the void increases, the defect identification capability gradually enhances, and void defects larger than 26% can be detected. For both types of pipes, as the wall thickness increases, the infrared detection time window gradually narrows, with the most significant reduction observed for 30% void defects. This study serves as a reference and provides a theoretical basis for the infrared thermal imaging detection of cavity defects in externally prestressed pipes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-025-01284-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing infrared thermography detection of cavitation defects in external prestressed pipelines is characterised by a variety of test conditions, making it difficult to explore the applicable conditions thoroughly by experiment. To address this issue, key parameters for the numerical model of hydration heat transfer in grouting material for prestressed pipes were established through the fitting of simulation experiments and field experiments. Subsequently, simulation models were constructed under various conditions to investigate the factors affecting the detection of void defects using infrared thermal imaging, including the presence or absence of steel strands, the size of void defects, the material of the pipeline, and its wall thickness. Our results demonstrate that the presence of steel strands reduces the defect identification capability, with the maximum contrast (MaxΔT) decreasing by 1.117℃ in high polyethylene (HDPE) pipes with a 100% void area. Galvanized steel (GSP) pipes are more difficult to detect than HDPE pipes due to their lower emissivity, particularly in the case of GSP pipes with a 60% void area, where MaxΔT is reduced by 18.96% compared to HDPE pipes. As the size of the void increases, the defect identification capability gradually enhances, and void defects larger than 26% can be detected. For both types of pipes, as the wall thickness increases, the infrared detection time window gradually narrows, with the most significant reduction observed for 30% void defects. This study serves as a reference and provides a theoretical basis for the infrared thermal imaging detection of cavity defects in externally prestressed pipes.

Abstract Image

热成像在水化热激励下检测桥梁预应力管道孔洞缺陷适用性的有限元模拟研究
现有的外预应力管道空化缺陷红外热像检测的试验条件多种多样,难以通过实验深入探索其适用条件。针对这一问题,通过模拟试验与现场试验的拟合,建立了预应力管道注浆材料水化传热数值模型的关键参数。随后,在各种条件下建立仿真模型,研究影响红外热成像空洞缺陷检测的因素,包括是否存在钢绞线、空洞缺陷的大小、管道的材料、管壁厚度等。我们的研究结果表明,钢绞线的存在降低了缺陷识别能力,在空隙率为100%的高聚乙烯(HDPE)管中,最大对比度(MaxΔT)降低了1.117℃。镀锌钢(GSP)管比HDPE管更难检测,因为它们的发射率较低,特别是在GSP管有60%空隙面积的情况下,与HDPE管相比,MaxΔT减少了18.96%。随着孔洞尺寸的增大,缺陷识别能力逐渐增强,可以检测到大于26%的孔洞缺陷。对于两种类型的管道,随着壁厚的增加,红外检测时间窗逐渐变窄,其中孔洞缺陷减少幅度最大,为30%。本研究可为外预应力管道空腔缺陷的红外热成像检测提供参考和理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation provides a forum for the broad range of scientific and engineering activities involved in developing a quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capability. This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers on the development of new equipment, analyses, and approaches to nondestructive measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信