Co-constructing adaptive lesson plans with GenAI: Pre-service teachers' Intelligent-TPACK and prompt engineering strategies

IF 13.2 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Computers & Education Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105485
Ismail Celik , Sini Kontkanen , Jari Laru , Alanur Ahsen Dalyanci
{"title":"Co-constructing adaptive lesson plans with GenAI: Pre-service teachers' Intelligent-TPACK and prompt engineering strategies","authors":"Ismail Celik ,&nbsp;Sini Kontkanen ,&nbsp;Jari Laru ,&nbsp;Alanur Ahsen Dalyanci","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies present new opportunities for teachers to design adaptive and student-centered instruction. However, the educational value of GenAI depends not only on technical usage but also on teachers' ability to formulate pedagogically meaningful prompts. Prompting strategies are not isolated from teachers′ prior knowledge and skills. Less is known about how pre-service teachers′ AI-related knowledge influences prompt engineering strategies, in turn leading to meaningful adaptive lesson plans. Considering this gap, we design an instructional task for pre-service teachers to generate adaptive lesson plans with the help of GenAI. Prior to the task, we collected data about their AI-related skills, namely AI literacy and Intelligent-TPACK. The prompts were qualitatively analyzed based on the phases of the Knowledge Construction (KC) Framework. Then, we explored the pedagogical value of adaptive lesson plans through a rubric in terms of three indicators: student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. PLS-SEM analysis revealed that as long as pre-service teachers have AI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge, they formulate higher phases of prompts based on the KC framework. Our analysis showed that prompts from higher phases generated more adaptive lesson plans in terms of student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. We also found an indirect effect of Intelligent-TPK on adaptive lesson plans. This study highlights that effective prompt engineering is a pedagogical act shaped by teachers’ knowledge, not merely a technical command. It also underscores the importance of embedding AI-specific pedagogical training in teacher education. By conceptualizing prompts as epistemic moves, we offer new insights into how teachers and GenAI can collaborate to produce responsive and inclusive learning experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 105485"},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525002532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies present new opportunities for teachers to design adaptive and student-centered instruction. However, the educational value of GenAI depends not only on technical usage but also on teachers' ability to formulate pedagogically meaningful prompts. Prompting strategies are not isolated from teachers′ prior knowledge and skills. Less is known about how pre-service teachers′ AI-related knowledge influences prompt engineering strategies, in turn leading to meaningful adaptive lesson plans. Considering this gap, we design an instructional task for pre-service teachers to generate adaptive lesson plans with the help of GenAI. Prior to the task, we collected data about their AI-related skills, namely AI literacy and Intelligent-TPACK. The prompts were qualitatively analyzed based on the phases of the Knowledge Construction (KC) Framework. Then, we explored the pedagogical value of adaptive lesson plans through a rubric in terms of three indicators: student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. PLS-SEM analysis revealed that as long as pre-service teachers have AI-specific technological and pedagogical knowledge, they formulate higher phases of prompts based on the KC framework. Our analysis showed that prompts from higher phases generated more adaptive lesson plans in terms of student agency, adaptive strategies, and flexible tools. We also found an indirect effect of Intelligent-TPK on adaptive lesson plans. This study highlights that effective prompt engineering is a pedagogical act shaped by teachers’ knowledge, not merely a technical command. It also underscores the importance of embedding AI-specific pedagogical training in teacher education. By conceptualizing prompts as epistemic moves, we offer new insights into how teachers and GenAI can collaborate to produce responsive and inclusive learning experiences.
与GenAI共同建构适应性教案:职前教师的智能tpack与即时工程策略
生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术为教师设计适应性强、以学生为中心的教学提供了新的机会。然而,GenAI的教育价值不仅取决于技术使用,还取决于教师制定有教学意义的提示的能力。提示策略并非孤立于教师的先验知识和技能之外。对于职前教师的人工智能相关知识如何影响提示工程策略,进而导致有意义的适应性课程计划,人们知之甚少。考虑到这一差距,我们为职前教师设计了一个教学任务,让他们在GenAI的帮助下生成适应性课程计划。在任务之前,我们收集了他们的人工智能相关技能数据,即人工智能素养和智能tpack。根据知识构建(KC)框架的阶段对提示进行定性分析。然后,我们通过三个指标来探讨适应性教案的教学价值:学生代理、适应性策略和灵活的工具。PLS-SEM分析显示,只要职前教师具有人工智能特定的技术和教学知识,他们就会根据KC框架制定更高阶段的提示。我们的分析表明,在学生代理、适应性策略和灵活的工具方面,来自较高阶段的提示产生了更具适应性的课程计划。我们还发现了智能tpk对适应性课程计划的间接影响。本研究强调,有效的提示工程是由教师的知识塑造的教学行为,而不仅仅是技术命令。报告还强调了在教师教育中纳入针对人工智能的教学培训的重要性。通过将提示概念化为认知动作,我们为教师和GenAI如何合作创造响应性和包容性的学习体验提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书