Assessing subway station flood risks with a resilience Framework: Combining weighting methods and two-dimensional cloud model

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
De-Sai Guo , Xin-Xin Yang , Jin-Chen Yang , Huai-Na Wu , Fan-Yan Meng , Ren-Peng Chen
{"title":"Assessing subway station flood risks with a resilience Framework: Combining weighting methods and two-dimensional cloud model","authors":"De-Sai Guo ,&nbsp;Xin-Xin Yang ,&nbsp;Jin-Chen Yang ,&nbsp;Huai-Na Wu ,&nbsp;Fan-Yan Meng ,&nbsp;Ren-Peng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a resilience-based flood risk assessment framework for subway stations. Grounded in resilience theory, the TOSE-4Rs framework systematically identifies risk factors across Technical, Organizational, Social, and Economic dimensions, establishing a comprehensive evaluation index system. A combined weighting approach integrating Lagrange optimization, the C-OWA operator, and entropy weighting mitigates subjective or objective bias inherent in single methods. Addressing the probability and loss of flood disasters concurrently in the subway station, a two-dimensional cloud model quantifies assessment uncertainty and fuzziness. Risk levels are determined by comparing evaluation cloud maps against standard evaluation cloud map, with closeness degree validating result accuracy. The new method is applied to the flood risk analysis of 8 subway stations in the Changsha Subway, and the calculation results show that: (<em>i</em>) The result was consistent with the actual situation. And compared with the FAHP, which validates the applicability and accuracy of the employed methodology. (<em>ii</em>) Based on assessment results, corresponding flood control measures are put forward for subway stations with higher risk assessment levels. Therefore, this new method has high theoretical value and practical significance and can provide a reference for the flood risk assessment of subway stations in other engineering fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107170"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825008089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a resilience-based flood risk assessment framework for subway stations. Grounded in resilience theory, the TOSE-4Rs framework systematically identifies risk factors across Technical, Organizational, Social, and Economic dimensions, establishing a comprehensive evaluation index system. A combined weighting approach integrating Lagrange optimization, the C-OWA operator, and entropy weighting mitigates subjective or objective bias inherent in single methods. Addressing the probability and loss of flood disasters concurrently in the subway station, a two-dimensional cloud model quantifies assessment uncertainty and fuzziness. Risk levels are determined by comparing evaluation cloud maps against standard evaluation cloud map, with closeness degree validating result accuracy. The new method is applied to the flood risk analysis of 8 subway stations in the Changsha Subway, and the calculation results show that: (i) The result was consistent with the actual situation. And compared with the FAHP, which validates the applicability and accuracy of the employed methodology. (ii) Based on assessment results, corresponding flood control measures are put forward for subway stations with higher risk assessment levels. Therefore, this new method has high theoretical value and practical significance and can provide a reference for the flood risk assessment of subway stations in other engineering fields.
基于弹性框架的地铁车站洪水风险评估:结合加权法和二维云模型
本研究提出了一个基于弹性的地铁车站洪水风险评估框架。基于弹性理论,TOSE-4Rs框架系统地识别了技术、组织、社会和经济四个维度的风险因素,建立了综合评价指标体系。结合拉格朗日优化、C-OWA算子和熵权的组合加权方法减轻了单一方法固有的主观或客观偏差。利用二维云模型对地铁车站洪水灾害的不确定性和模糊性进行量化,同时解决了洪水灾害发生的概率和损失问题。通过比较评价云图和标准评价云图来确定风险等级,用接近度验证结果的准确性。将新方法应用于长沙地铁8个地铁站的洪水风险分析,计算结果表明:(1)计算结果与实际情况相符。并与FAHP进行了比较,验证了所采用方法的适用性和准确性。(ii)根据评价结果,对风险评价等级较高的地铁站提出相应的防洪措施。因此,该新方法具有较高的理论价值和实际意义,可为其他工程领域的地铁车站洪水风险评估提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信