A multi-stage biogas upgrading system for household applications: Removal of hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and moisture using Locally Sourced materials
{"title":"A multi-stage biogas upgrading system for household applications: Removal of hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and moisture using Locally Sourced materials","authors":"Panadda Solod , Wannadear Nawae , Thanwit Naemsai , Jaruwat Jareanjit , Wasu Suksuwan","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, we aim to study and develop a low-cost multi-stage biogas system for household applications using local materials. The system consisted of three sequential stages: hydrogen sulfide removal using ferric chloride and sodium hydroxide solution–coated clay pellets, carbon dioxide scrubbing with lime water, and moisture control with mangrove charcoal. From the experiments, H<sub>2</sub>S can be reduced from over 100 ppm–1.67 ppm to achieve the non-corrosive level for domestic appliances by coated clay pellets. 10 g/L of lime water yielded the highest efficiency (7.84 %) for CO<sub>2</sub> removal. An increase in lime water concentration over 10 g/L diminishes the CO<sub>2</sub> removal due to calcium carbonate precipitation and mass-transfer limitations. In the moisture control stage, the adsorption of mangrove and compressed briquette charcoal is compared; mangrove charcoal exhibited higher capacity and maintained adsorption for ∼110 min, while compressed briquettes reached saturation earlier at ∼55 min. The methane concentration has remained stable in every stage while doing the experiment, with 0.5–1 % of total loss, which is a negligible penalty. The proposed integrated system effectively eliminated H<sub>2</sub>S, reduced moisture, and partially removed CO<sub>2</sub>, which increased the safety and usability of biogas. While commercial technology (PSA or membrane separation) provides high methane purity and high capital and operation costs. The proposed system offers a more affordable and accessible solution for small-scale rural households. The findings highlight both the feasibility and limitations of using simple, low-cost materials, while future research should emphasize kinetic modeling, CO<sub>2</sub> scrubbing optimization, and long-term adsorbent regeneration to strengthen scalability and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 108499"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425009109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, we aim to study and develop a low-cost multi-stage biogas system for household applications using local materials. The system consisted of three sequential stages: hydrogen sulfide removal using ferric chloride and sodium hydroxide solution–coated clay pellets, carbon dioxide scrubbing with lime water, and moisture control with mangrove charcoal. From the experiments, H2S can be reduced from over 100 ppm–1.67 ppm to achieve the non-corrosive level for domestic appliances by coated clay pellets. 10 g/L of lime water yielded the highest efficiency (7.84 %) for CO2 removal. An increase in lime water concentration over 10 g/L diminishes the CO2 removal due to calcium carbonate precipitation and mass-transfer limitations. In the moisture control stage, the adsorption of mangrove and compressed briquette charcoal is compared; mangrove charcoal exhibited higher capacity and maintained adsorption for ∼110 min, while compressed briquettes reached saturation earlier at ∼55 min. The methane concentration has remained stable in every stage while doing the experiment, with 0.5–1 % of total loss, which is a negligible penalty. The proposed integrated system effectively eliminated H2S, reduced moisture, and partially removed CO2, which increased the safety and usability of biogas. While commercial technology (PSA or membrane separation) provides high methane purity and high capital and operation costs. The proposed system offers a more affordable and accessible solution for small-scale rural households. The findings highlight both the feasibility and limitations of using simple, low-cost materials, while future research should emphasize kinetic modeling, CO2 scrubbing optimization, and long-term adsorbent regeneration to strengthen scalability and reliability.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.