Eli C. Russell , Wykle C. Greene , Matthew P. Spoth , Kevin W. Bamber , Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro , Michael L. Flessner
{"title":"Field testing of the Redekop seed control unit in soybean and wheat production systems in Virginia","authors":"Eli C. Russell , Wykle C. Greene , Matthew P. Spoth , Kevin W. Bamber , Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro , Michael L. Flessner","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seed impact mills are machines that are mounted directly to the back of a combine and are one way to implement harvest weed seed control (HWSC). Seed impact mills kill weed seeds during harvest, preventing seeds from being added to the soil seedbank. Previous research has indicated that seed impact mills have high seed kill rates (>90 %) for problematic weeds in soybean and wheat. While these mills are effective, there are many ways that seeds could bypass the seed impact mill, such as shattering and seed loss at the header during harvest, which could reduce the effectiveness of these mills. In the field, tracking weed density in the following seasons after harvest could indicate overall effectiveness of using a seed impact mill. The purpose of this experiment was to track emergence of common ragweed (<em>Ambrosia artemisiifolia</em>) and Italian ryegrass (<em>Lolium perenne</em> ssp<em>. multiflorum</em>) in soybean and wheat fields, respectively, after harvesting with a seed impact mill. Seven soybean fields and four wheat fields in commercial production were tracked for <em>A. artemisiifolia</em> and <em>L. perenne</em> ssp. <em>multiflorum</em> density, respectively. For testing, each field was divided into two sections: with and without the use of the seed impact mill. Weed emergence was recorded in the following seasons. Density reductions for <em>A. artemisiifolia</em> after one year of HWSC were 26 % and 77 % at the postemergence herbicide and harvest timings, respectively. There was also a 99 % reduction after two harvests with HWSC, but a single HWSC harvest followed by a conventional harvest resulted in a 330 % increase. The density reduction of <em>L. perenne</em> ssp. <em>multiflorum</em> after one harvest was 48 %. These data indicate that seed impact mills can be an effective tool for reducing inputs into soil seedbank and weed densities in following seasons in systems under commercial production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425003308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seed impact mills are machines that are mounted directly to the back of a combine and are one way to implement harvest weed seed control (HWSC). Seed impact mills kill weed seeds during harvest, preventing seeds from being added to the soil seedbank. Previous research has indicated that seed impact mills have high seed kill rates (>90 %) for problematic weeds in soybean and wheat. While these mills are effective, there are many ways that seeds could bypass the seed impact mill, such as shattering and seed loss at the header during harvest, which could reduce the effectiveness of these mills. In the field, tracking weed density in the following seasons after harvest could indicate overall effectiveness of using a seed impact mill. The purpose of this experiment was to track emergence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in soybean and wheat fields, respectively, after harvesting with a seed impact mill. Seven soybean fields and four wheat fields in commercial production were tracked for A. artemisiifolia and L. perenne ssp. multiflorum density, respectively. For testing, each field was divided into two sections: with and without the use of the seed impact mill. Weed emergence was recorded in the following seasons. Density reductions for A. artemisiifolia after one year of HWSC were 26 % and 77 % at the postemergence herbicide and harvest timings, respectively. There was also a 99 % reduction after two harvests with HWSC, but a single HWSC harvest followed by a conventional harvest resulted in a 330 % increase. The density reduction of L. perenne ssp. multiflorum after one harvest was 48 %. These data indicate that seed impact mills can be an effective tool for reducing inputs into soil seedbank and weed densities in following seasons in systems under commercial production.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.