“Visible hand” and “invisible hand”: The impact of market-driven environmental regulation on corporate carbon information disclosure

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ying Qu, Yaodong Cang
{"title":"“Visible hand” and “invisible hand”: The impact of market-driven environmental regulation on corporate carbon information disclosure","authors":"Ying Qu,&nbsp;Yaodong Cang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In theory, carbon information disclosure (CID) is meant to enhance corporate economic returns during carbon reduction. Unfortunately, in China, CID currently remains insufficient under mandatory-driven environment regulations. In contrast, as a market-driven environment regulation, carbon emission trading (CET) has proven effective in improving both corporate decarbonization outcomes and economic performance. However, whether CET can help promote CID currently remains unclear. Taking A-share listed enterprises in China as research samples, using data spanning the period from 2011 to 2022, this study estimates the impact of CET on CID through the difference-in-differences (DID) method. The findings reveal that: (1) CET significantly enhances corporate CID, both in terms of carbon information disclosure behavior (CIDB) and carbon information disclosure quality (CIDQ). (2) Also, CET facilitates CID by promoting green technological innovation and attracting analysts' attention. (3) Government environmental attention positively moderates improvements in CIDQ. (4) Treatment effects exhibit heterogeneity. Specifically, the effects are more pronounced in large, non-bottleneck enterprises, labor-intensive industries, and regions with advanced digital financial inclusion. The study's results remain robust across parallel trend tests, propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), counterfactual analyses, and placebo tests. These findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of market-driven environmental regulations and provide policymakers with empirical evidence to optimize CET implementation and enhance CID promotion strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"530 ","pages":"Article 146885"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625022413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In theory, carbon information disclosure (CID) is meant to enhance corporate economic returns during carbon reduction. Unfortunately, in China, CID currently remains insufficient under mandatory-driven environment regulations. In contrast, as a market-driven environment regulation, carbon emission trading (CET) has proven effective in improving both corporate decarbonization outcomes and economic performance. However, whether CET can help promote CID currently remains unclear. Taking A-share listed enterprises in China as research samples, using data spanning the period from 2011 to 2022, this study estimates the impact of CET on CID through the difference-in-differences (DID) method. The findings reveal that: (1) CET significantly enhances corporate CID, both in terms of carbon information disclosure behavior (CIDB) and carbon information disclosure quality (CIDQ). (2) Also, CET facilitates CID by promoting green technological innovation and attracting analysts' attention. (3) Government environmental attention positively moderates improvements in CIDQ. (4) Treatment effects exhibit heterogeneity. Specifically, the effects are more pronounced in large, non-bottleneck enterprises, labor-intensive industries, and regions with advanced digital financial inclusion. The study's results remain robust across parallel trend tests, propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), counterfactual analyses, and placebo tests. These findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of market-driven environmental regulations and provide policymakers with empirical evidence to optimize CET implementation and enhance CID promotion strategies.
“看得见的手”与“看不见的手”:市场环境规制对企业碳信息披露的影响
从理论上讲,碳信息披露是为了提高企业在碳减排过程中的经济回报。不幸的是,在中国,CID目前在强制性的环境法规下仍然不足。相比之下,碳排放交易作为一种市场驱动的环境监管,在改善企业脱碳成果和经济绩效方面都被证明是有效的。然而,CET是否有助于促进CID目前尚不清楚。本研究以中国a股上市企业为研究样本,使用2011 - 2022年的数据,通过差分中的差分(DID)方法估计CET对CID的影响。研究发现:(1)CET显著提高了企业CID,无论是碳信息披露行为(CIDB)还是碳信息披露质量(CIDQ)。(2)同时,CET促进了绿色技术创新,吸引了分析师的关注,从而促进了CID。(3)政府对环境的关注正向调节CIDQ的改善。(4)治疗效果呈现异质性。具体而言,在大型、非瓶颈企业、劳动密集型产业和数字普惠金融发达地区,这种效应更为明显。该研究的结果在平行趋势测试、倾向得分匹配差异中的差异(PSM-DID)、反事实分析和安慰剂测试中仍然是稳健的。这些研究结果有助于从理论上理解市场驱动的环境法规,并为政策制定者优化CET实施和加强CID推广策略提供实证证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信