pREdicting Long-Term Major advErse carDiac and Cerebrovascular Events After Percutaneous coronarY Intervention: The REMEDY Score.

Jiaxi Cheng, Chenxi Song, Hao-Yu Wang, Zhangyu Lin, Zheng Qiao, Xiaohui Bian, Lei Feng, Chenggang Zhu, Min Yang, Guofeng Gao, Dong Yin, Kefei Dou
{"title":"pREdicting Long-Term Major advErse carDiac and Cerebrovascular Events After Percutaneous coronarY Intervention: The REMEDY Score.","authors":"Jiaxi Cheng, Chenxi Song, Hao-Yu Wang, Zhangyu Lin, Zheng Qiao, Xiaohui Bian, Lei Feng, Chenggang Zhu, Min Yang, Guofeng Gao, Dong Yin, Kefei Dou","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A clinically applicable tool incorporating comprehensive risk factors to evaluate long-term hard endpoints post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to develop a risk score from a large contemporary cohort to assess and stratify long-term risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) post-PCI, enabling proactive management and monitoring in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study prospectively enrolled 28,683 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 2017 to 2018, assigning the first 70% for score derivation and the remaining 30% for validation. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCEs, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A LASSO-Cox model identified 10 independent predictors, from which a weighted integer scoring system was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 3 years post-PCI, 1013 MACCEs (3.5%) were observed. A risk score incorporating three demographic factors (age, severe coronary artery disease history, hypertension duration), two clinical characteristics (left ventricular ejection fraction, clinical presentation), two angiographic features (affected vessels, calcification severity), and three laboratory results (glycated hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, estimated glomerular filtration rate) demonstrated strong predictive performance (c-index 0.764, AUC 0.831, goodness-of-fit p = 0.34). Patients were stratified into low (score 0-4, risk ≤ 2%), moderate (score 5-8, 2% < risk ≤ 5%), and high risk (score ≥ 9, risk > 5%), with corresponding 3-year MACCE incidences of 1.6%, 4.0%, and 10.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A contemporary simple risk score integrating 10 readily available variables accurately predicts long-term hard outcomes in PCI patients, facilitating personalized risk assessment and informed treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A clinically applicable tool incorporating comprehensive risk factors to evaluate long-term hard endpoints post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently lacking.

Aims: This study aims to develop a risk score from a large contemporary cohort to assess and stratify long-term risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) post-PCI, enabling proactive management and monitoring in high-risk patients.

Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 28,683 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 2017 to 2018, assigning the first 70% for score derivation and the remaining 30% for validation. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCEs, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A LASSO-Cox model identified 10 independent predictors, from which a weighted integer scoring system was developed.

Results: Within 3 years post-PCI, 1013 MACCEs (3.5%) were observed. A risk score incorporating three demographic factors (age, severe coronary artery disease history, hypertension duration), two clinical characteristics (left ventricular ejection fraction, clinical presentation), two angiographic features (affected vessels, calcification severity), and three laboratory results (glycated hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, estimated glomerular filtration rate) demonstrated strong predictive performance (c-index 0.764, AUC 0.831, goodness-of-fit p = 0.34). Patients were stratified into low (score 0-4, risk ≤ 2%), moderate (score 5-8, 2% < risk ≤ 5%), and high risk (score ≥ 9, risk > 5%), with corresponding 3-year MACCE incidences of 1.6%, 4.0%, and 10.1%.

Conclusions: A contemporary simple risk score integrating 10 readily available variables accurately predicts long-term hard outcomes in PCI patients, facilitating personalized risk assessment and informed treatment decisions.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后预测长期主要心脑血管不良事件:补救评分。
背景:目前缺乏一种临床适用的综合危险因素的工具来评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的长期硬终点。目的:本研究旨在从一个大型当代队列中建立一个风险评分,以评估和分层pci后主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)的长期风险,以便对高危患者进行主动管理和监测。方法:该研究前瞻性纳入2017年至2018年连续接受PCI治疗的28,683例患者,分配前70%用于评分推导,其余30%用于验证。主要终点是3年MACCEs,包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中。LASSO-Cox模型确定了10个独立的预测因子,并据此开发了加权整数评分系统。结果:pci术后3年内,观察到1013例MACCEs(3.5%)。包含三个人口统计学因素(年龄、严重冠状动脉病史、高血压病程)、两个临床特征(左心室射血分数、临床表现)、两个血管造影特征(受影响血管、钙化严重程度)和三个实验室结果(糖化血红蛋白、n端前b型利钠肽、肾小球滤过率)的风险评分显示出强大的预测能力(c指数0.764,AUC 0.831,拟合优度p = 0.34)。患者被分为低(0-4分,风险≤2%)、中(5-8分,风险≤5%),相应的3年MACCE发病率分别为1.6%、4.0%和10.1%。结论:整合10个现成变量的当代简单风险评分准确预测PCI患者的长期硬结果,促进个性化风险评估和明智的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信