Eye-movement markers of mind wandering during reading: A meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Diane C Mézière, Niilo E Hautala, Timo T Heikkilä, Johanna K Kaakinen
{"title":"Eye-movement markers of mind wandering during reading: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Diane C Mézière, Niilo E Hautala, Timo T Heikkilä, Johanna K Kaakinen","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01797-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mind wandering during reading has been extensively investigated, with multiple studies reporting differences in eye-movement behavior between mind-wandering and on-task reading. More recently, researchers have tried to use eye-movement measures to predict mind wandering during reading; however such indicators of mind wandering during reading have not yet been clearly identified. This article presents results from two studies. Firstly, we carried out a meta-analysis to identify eye-movement indicators of mind wandering during reading. From the initial search, abstracts from 140 articles were reviewed for eligibility, and 39 articles were included for full text reading and data extraction. Finally, we identified 16 individual datasets from 19 articles for which we could compute effect sizes. We calculated effect sizes for nine eye-movement measures: mean fixation duration, fixations count, first-fixation duration, gaze duration, total reading time, saccade length, skipping, blink count, and inter-word regressions. The results indicated that readers skipped more words and made fewer fixations during mind-wandering compared to on-task reading. Following these results, we carried out exploratory analyses with a dataset from our own lab to examine other possible explanations for this eye-movement pattern. Specifically, we investigated readers' sensitivity to word frequency and length and readers' use of corrective regressions. Results indicated that readers show reduced effects of word length and frequency on skipping behavior as well as a reduced use of corrective regressions during mind-wandering compared to on-task reading. Results and implications from both studies are discussed in the context of mind-wandering and reading research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01797-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mind wandering during reading has been extensively investigated, with multiple studies reporting differences in eye-movement behavior between mind-wandering and on-task reading. More recently, researchers have tried to use eye-movement measures to predict mind wandering during reading; however such indicators of mind wandering during reading have not yet been clearly identified. This article presents results from two studies. Firstly, we carried out a meta-analysis to identify eye-movement indicators of mind wandering during reading. From the initial search, abstracts from 140 articles were reviewed for eligibility, and 39 articles were included for full text reading and data extraction. Finally, we identified 16 individual datasets from 19 articles for which we could compute effect sizes. We calculated effect sizes for nine eye-movement measures: mean fixation duration, fixations count, first-fixation duration, gaze duration, total reading time, saccade length, skipping, blink count, and inter-word regressions. The results indicated that readers skipped more words and made fewer fixations during mind-wandering compared to on-task reading. Following these results, we carried out exploratory analyses with a dataset from our own lab to examine other possible explanations for this eye-movement pattern. Specifically, we investigated readers' sensitivity to word frequency and length and readers' use of corrective regressions. Results indicated that readers show reduced effects of word length and frequency on skipping behavior as well as a reduced use of corrective regressions during mind-wandering compared to on-task reading. Results and implications from both studies are discussed in the context of mind-wandering and reading research.

阅读中走神的眼动标记:一项元分析。
阅读过程中的走神已经得到了广泛的调查,多项研究报告了走神和任务阅读之间眼球运动行为的差异。最近,研究人员试图用眼动测量来预测阅读过程中的走神;然而,这些在阅读过程中走神的指标还没有被清楚地识别出来。本文介绍了两项研究的结果。首先,我们对阅读过程中走神的眼动指标进行了meta分析。从最初的检索中,我们审查了140篇文章的摘要是否符合条件,并纳入了39篇文章进行全文阅读和数据提取。最后,我们从19篇文章中确定了16个单独的数据集,我们可以计算效果大小。我们计算了九种眼动测量的效应量:平均注视时间、注视次数、首次注视时间、凝视时间、总阅读时间、扫视长度、跳跃、眨眼次数和词间回归。结果表明,与任务阅读相比,读者在走神时跳过的单词更多,注视的对象更少。根据这些结果,我们用自己实验室的数据集进行了探索性分析,以检查这种眼球运动模式的其他可能解释。具体来说,我们调查了读者对词频和长度的敏感性以及读者对校正回归的使用。结果表明,与任务阅读相比,读者在走神时,单词长度和频率对跳跃性行为的影响较小,纠正性回归的使用也较少。本文在走神和阅读研究的背景下讨论了这两项研究的结果和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信