Conservative treatment of patellofemoral pain: effectiveness of strength exercises compared to other treatments. a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mattia Morri, Angela Contri, Vincenzo Peccerillo, Enrico Venturini, Clizia Guerrini, Ilaria Berardo, Riccardo Ruisi
{"title":"Conservative treatment of patellofemoral pain: effectiveness of strength exercises compared to other treatments. a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Mattia Morri, Angela Contri, Vincenzo Peccerillo, Enrico Venturini, Clizia Guerrini, Ilaria Berardo, Riccardo Ruisi","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01297-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of strengthening exercise compared to other conservative treatment methods to reduce pain and improve functional abilities for patellofemoral pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were the databases consulted from inception until June 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included with patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain, adolescents over 16 years of age and adults up to 44 years of age, athletes and non-athletes, regardless of gender, and in which pain recorded at 4-6 weeks or 8-12 weeks follow-up was the primary outcome. Functional evaluation scales of the knee as the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, with a follow-up of 8-12 weeks or 6 months were secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Database search yielded a total of 1,654 papers and 12 papers were included. The meta-analysis on the change in pre- and post-treatment pain at 4-6 weeks and 8-12 weeks showed an average reduction of -1.44 (CI. -2.20; -0.67) for 601 patients included and  -0.8 (CI -1.23;  -0.37) in favour of the intervention group with exercises for 719 patients. In subgroup analysis performed for woman population, the mean difference in pain reduction was  -2.81 (CI -4.39; -1.23). At 8-12 weeks, standardized mean difference for functional outcomes, in pre-post treatment variation between the two groups was 0.08 (CI -0.07; 0.24) in favour of the intervention for 685 patients included. A very low and low level of certainty of the evidence was recorded based on Risk of Bias analysis and GRADE method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A positive effect in the use of muscle strengthening strategies in the treatment of patellofemoral pain was highlighted, albeit with a low level of certainty of the results. Women benefit most from treatment with strengthening exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01297-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of strengthening exercise compared to other conservative treatment methods to reduce pain and improve functional abilities for patellofemoral pain.

Methods: MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase were the databases consulted from inception until June 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included with patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain, adolescents over 16 years of age and adults up to 44 years of age, athletes and non-athletes, regardless of gender, and in which pain recorded at 4-6 weeks or 8-12 weeks follow-up was the primary outcome. Functional evaluation scales of the knee as the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, with a follow-up of 8-12 weeks or 6 months were secondary outcome.

Results: Database search yielded a total of 1,654 papers and 12 papers were included. The meta-analysis on the change in pre- and post-treatment pain at 4-6 weeks and 8-12 weeks showed an average reduction of -1.44 (CI. -2.20; -0.67) for 601 patients included and  -0.8 (CI -1.23;  -0.37) in favour of the intervention group with exercises for 719 patients. In subgroup analysis performed for woman population, the mean difference in pain reduction was  -2.81 (CI -4.39; -1.23). At 8-12 weeks, standardized mean difference for functional outcomes, in pre-post treatment variation between the two groups was 0.08 (CI -0.07; 0.24) in favour of the intervention for 685 patients included. A very low and low level of certainty of the evidence was recorded based on Risk of Bias analysis and GRADE method.

Conclusion: A positive effect in the use of muscle strengthening strategies in the treatment of patellofemoral pain was highlighted, albeit with a low level of certainty of the results. Women benefit most from treatment with strengthening exercises.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

髌股疼痛的保守治疗:与其他治疗方法相比,力量锻炼的有效性。荟萃分析的系统综述。
目的:本研究旨在探讨与其他保守治疗方法相比,强化运动对减轻髌股疼痛和改善功能能力的有效性。方法:MEDLINE、物理治疗证据数据库、Scopus、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和Embase数据库从建立到2024年6月。随机对照试验(RCTs)纳入诊断为髌骨疼痛的患者,16岁以上的青少年和44岁以下的成年人,运动员和非运动员,不分性别,其中4-6周或8-12周随访记录的疼痛是主要结局。膝关节功能评估量表如膝关节前侧疼痛量表,随访8-12周或6个月为次要结果。结果:数据库共检索论文1654篇,纳入论文12篇。对治疗前和治疗后4-6周和8-12周疼痛变化的meta分析显示,平均减少-1.44 (CI)。-2.20;601例患者中-0.67),719例患者中-0.8 (CI -1.23; -0.37)支持运动干预组。在对女性人群进行的亚组分析中,疼痛减轻的平均差异为-2.81 (CI -4.39; -1.23)。在8-12周时,两组治疗前后功能结果的标准化平均差异为0.08 (CI -0.07; 0.24),支持685例患者的干预。根据偏倚风险分析和GRADE方法记录的证据的确定性非常低。结论:强调了使用肌肉强化策略治疗髌骨股痛的积极作用,尽管结果的确定性较低。女性从强化锻炼中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信