Family systems care approaches and methodologies for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Christina Schuler, Faith Agbozo, George Edward Ntow, Barbara Preusse-Bleuler, Riccardo E Pfister
{"title":"Family systems care approaches and methodologies for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Christina Schuler, Faith Agbozo, George Edward Ntow, Barbara Preusse-Bleuler, Riccardo E Pfister","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02951-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Providing family-centred maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services along a care continuum could significantly improve outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In LIMCs, family systems care (FSC) is currently not well integrated into the continuum of care from hospital, community, to the home levels.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to explore the approaches, methodologies and tools used to translate family systems care programmes/interventions in the continuum of care for MNCH in different care settings in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This scoping review will include evidence of approaches, methodologies and tools used to translate FSC into the care continuum for MNCH in LMICs. It will also include evidence reporting on contextual determinants, such as mitigating and limiting factors. Evidence not in English, outside the MNCH scope or using a person- rather than family-centred approach will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review checklist, the following stages will involve two or more researchers: (1) literature search, (2) data extraction, (3) analysis and (4) narrative summary. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and grey literature via organisational homepages will be searched. Published English work without limitation on publication year is eligible. Data extraction and analysis will be guided by a template comprising approaches, methodologies and tools to translate FSC into the care continuum. Data will be presented in tabular form with an accompanying narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/zwg9k ).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02951-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Providing family-centred maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services along a care continuum could significantly improve outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In LIMCs, family systems care (FSC) is currently not well integrated into the continuum of care from hospital, community, to the home levels.
Objective: This scoping review aims to explore the approaches, methodologies and tools used to translate family systems care programmes/interventions in the continuum of care for MNCH in different care settings in LMICs.
Eligibility criteria: This scoping review will include evidence of approaches, methodologies and tools used to translate FSC into the care continuum for MNCH in LMICs. It will also include evidence reporting on contextual determinants, such as mitigating and limiting factors. Evidence not in English, outside the MNCH scope or using a person- rather than family-centred approach will be excluded.
Methods: Following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review checklist, the following stages will involve two or more researchers: (1) literature search, (2) data extraction, (3) analysis and (4) narrative summary. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and grey literature via organisational homepages will be searched. Published English work without limitation on publication year is eligible. Data extraction and analysis will be guided by a template comprising approaches, methodologies and tools to translate FSC into the care continuum. Data will be presented in tabular form with an accompanying narrative summary.
Systematic review registration: The protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/zwg9k ).
在护理连续体中提供以家庭为中心的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康服务可以显著改善低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的结果。在低收入国家,家庭系统护理(FSC)目前没有很好地纳入从医院、社区到家庭一级的连续护理。目的:本范围审查旨在探讨在低收入和中等收入国家不同护理环境中,将家庭系统护理方案/干预措施转化为MNCH连续护理的方法、方法和工具。资格标准:该范围审查将包括用于将FSC转化为低收入和中等收入国家MNCH护理连续体的方法、方法和工具的证据。它还将包括关于环境决定因素的证据报告,例如减轻和限制因素。非英语的证据,在MNCH范围之外或使用以人为中心而不是以家庭为中心的方法将被排除在外。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA扩展范围审查清单的建议,以下阶段将涉及两名或两名以上的研究人员:(1)文献检索,(2)数据提取,(3)分析,(4)叙述总结。检索在线医学文献分析与检索系统(Medline)、护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Web of Science和组织主页上的灰色文献。已发表的英文作品,不限出版年份。数据提取和分析将由一个模板指导,该模板包括将FSC转化为护理连续体的方法、方法和工具。数据将以表格形式提出,并附有叙述性摘要。系统评价注册:该方案在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/zwg9k)注册。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.