Effects of different physical therapy training protocols on patients with idiopathic scoliosis: Short-term results.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-10-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0334713
Haohan Lu, Min Li, Naizhen Wang, Guobiao Ye, Feilong Zhu, Mingling Guo, Cheng Zeng
{"title":"Effects of different physical therapy training protocols on patients with idiopathic scoliosis: Short-term results.","authors":"Haohan Lu, Min Li, Naizhen Wang, Guobiao Ye, Feilong Zhu, Mingling Guo, Cheng Zeng","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0334713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic scoliosis (IS), a three-dimensional spinal deformity common in adolescents, can be treated with numerous approaches, including Schroth, Spiral stabilization (SPS), and core exercises, to improve spinal alignment and health. However, few studies have shown the superiority of one treatment over another.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three distinct physical therapy protocols in managing IS among adolescents aged 6-18 years with Cobb angles ≤40°.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 61 patients were allocated to one of three therapeutic groups. Each group received interventions twice weekly for 10 sessions. Primary outcomes were assessed by measuring changes in the Cobb angle, whereas secondary outcomes included evaluations of pain (visual analog scale, VAS), the angle of trunk rotation (ATR), trunk aesthetic clinical evaluation (TRACE), radiographic parameters (Alignment of the C7 plumbline (C7PL), clavicle angle, and pelvic obliquity), and quality of life (the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire,SRS-22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed significant within-group improvements in the Cobb angle, pain, and trunk rotation for all interventions (p < 0.05). Notably, between-group comparisons indicated that both the Schroth and SPS modalities resulted in greater reductions in the Cobb angle and trunk rotation than core stabilization exercises did (p < 0.05). Moreover, SPS resulted in superior enhancements in the clavicle angle and dynamic postural control, whereas Schroth yielded significant improvements in C7PL alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This short-term study underscores the relative effectiveness of the Schroth and SPS interventions in managing three-dimensional spinal deformities and enhancing dynamic postural control while recognizing the limitations of core stabilization exercises for scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This retrospective analysis of a clinical trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500096077) https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ChiCTR2500096077.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 10","pages":"e0334713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic scoliosis (IS), a three-dimensional spinal deformity common in adolescents, can be treated with numerous approaches, including Schroth, Spiral stabilization (SPS), and core exercises, to improve spinal alignment and health. However, few studies have shown the superiority of one treatment over another.

Objective: This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three distinct physical therapy protocols in managing IS among adolescents aged 6-18 years with Cobb angles ≤40°.

Methods: A total of 61 patients were allocated to one of three therapeutic groups. Each group received interventions twice weekly for 10 sessions. Primary outcomes were assessed by measuring changes in the Cobb angle, whereas secondary outcomes included evaluations of pain (visual analog scale, VAS), the angle of trunk rotation (ATR), trunk aesthetic clinical evaluation (TRACE), radiographic parameters (Alignment of the C7 plumbline (C7PL), clavicle angle, and pelvic obliquity), and quality of life (the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire,SRS-22).

Results: The findings revealed significant within-group improvements in the Cobb angle, pain, and trunk rotation for all interventions (p < 0.05). Notably, between-group comparisons indicated that both the Schroth and SPS modalities resulted in greater reductions in the Cobb angle and trunk rotation than core stabilization exercises did (p < 0.05). Moreover, SPS resulted in superior enhancements in the clavicle angle and dynamic postural control, whereas Schroth yielded significant improvements in C7PL alignment.

Conclusion: This short-term study underscores the relative effectiveness of the Schroth and SPS interventions in managing three-dimensional spinal deformities and enhancing dynamic postural control while recognizing the limitations of core stabilization exercises for scoliosis.

Clinical trial registration: This retrospective analysis of a clinical trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500096077) https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ChiCTR2500096077.

不同物理治疗训练方案对特发性脊柱侧凸患者的影响:短期结果。
背景:特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)是一种在青少年中常见的三维脊柱畸形,可以通过多种方法治疗,包括Schroth,螺旋稳定(SPS)和核心训练,以改善脊柱对齐和健康。然而,很少有研究表明一种治疗方法优于另一种治疗方法。目的:本回顾性队列研究旨在评估三种不同的物理治疗方案在治疗Cobb角≤40°的6-18岁青少年IS中的疗效。方法:61例患者分为3个治疗组。每组每周接受两次干预,共10次。主要结果通过测量Cobb角的变化来评估,而次要结果包括疼痛(视觉模拟量表,VAS)、躯干旋转角(ATR)、躯干美学临床评价(TRACE)、放射学参数(C7铅线对齐(C7PL)、锁骨角和骨盆倾角)和生活质量(脊柱侧凸研究协会-22问卷,SRS-22)的评估。结果:研究结果显示,所有干预措施在Cobb角、疼痛和躯干旋转方面均有显著改善(p结论:这项短期研究强调了Schroth和SPS干预措施在管理三维脊柱畸形和增强动态姿势控制方面的相对有效性,同时认识到核心稳定训练对脊柱侧凸的局限性。临床试验注册:该临床试验的回顾性分析已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2500096077) https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ChiCTR2500096077注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信