Dual-layer spectral computed tomography (CT) parameters for identifying severe aortic regurgitation in aortic valve disease patients

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Z.X. Chen , J. Xu , W. Tian , N. Yang , X.D. Lu , J.Z. Xu , Y.X. Li , L. Xu , Z.L. Zhang , G. Wang
{"title":"Dual-layer spectral computed tomography (CT) parameters for identifying severe aortic regurgitation in aortic valve disease patients","authors":"Z.X. Chen ,&nbsp;J. Xu ,&nbsp;W. Tian ,&nbsp;N. Yang ,&nbsp;X.D. Lu ,&nbsp;J.Z. Xu ,&nbsp;Y.X. Li ,&nbsp;L. Xu ,&nbsp;Z.L. Zhang ,&nbsp;G. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.107067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>To investigate the diagnostic potential of dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT) in detecting the severe aortic regurgitation (sAR) among patients with aortic valve disease (AVD).</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>This retrospective study included 53 AVD patients who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and DLCT within one week. Patients were categorised into sAR (n = 16) and nonsevere AR (non-sAR, n = 37) groups based on TTE findings. DLCT parameters, including aortic annulus dimensions (max/min diameter, circumference, area), sinus of Valsalva (SOV) diameter, ascending aorta diameter (AoD), and myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, were analysed. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for sAR in patients with AVD, and the diagnostic performance of DLCT parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Patients with sAR were significantly younger and had larger aortic valve parameters compared to the non-sAR group. Computed tomography-ECV (CT-ECV) was notably higher in the sAR group (33.19 ± 3.86% vs 29.05 ± 4.58%, <em>P</em>&lt; 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified CT-ECV and SOV diameter as independent predictors of sAR (CT-ECV: OR = 1.531, 95% CI: 1.133–2.070, <em>P</em>= 0.006; SOV diameter: OR= 1.198, 95% CI: 1.056–1.359, <em>P</em>= 0.005). Both parameters effectively distinguished sAR from non-sAR patients. Their combined model enhanced diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.867) and maintained excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.819) in the mild-moderate AR (mAR) subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>DLCT-derived CT-ECV and aortic valve parameters effectively identify sAR in AVD patients. The combination of CT-ECV and SOV diameter offers the highest diagnostic accuracy, potentially improving AVD management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 107067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025002727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the diagnostic potential of dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT) in detecting the severe aortic regurgitation (sAR) among patients with aortic valve disease (AVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 53 AVD patients who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and DLCT within one week. Patients were categorised into sAR (n = 16) and nonsevere AR (non-sAR, n = 37) groups based on TTE findings. DLCT parameters, including aortic annulus dimensions (max/min diameter, circumference, area), sinus of Valsalva (SOV) diameter, ascending aorta diameter (AoD), and myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, were analysed. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for sAR in patients with AVD, and the diagnostic performance of DLCT parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Patients with sAR were significantly younger and had larger aortic valve parameters compared to the non-sAR group. Computed tomography-ECV (CT-ECV) was notably higher in the sAR group (33.19 ± 3.86% vs 29.05 ± 4.58%, P< 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified CT-ECV and SOV diameter as independent predictors of sAR (CT-ECV: OR = 1.531, 95% CI: 1.133–2.070, P= 0.006; SOV diameter: OR= 1.198, 95% CI: 1.056–1.359, P= 0.005). Both parameters effectively distinguished sAR from non-sAR patients. Their combined model enhanced diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.867) and maintained excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.819) in the mild-moderate AR (mAR) subgroup.

CONCLUSION

DLCT-derived CT-ECV and aortic valve parameters effectively identify sAR in AVD patients. The combination of CT-ECV and SOV diameter offers the highest diagnostic accuracy, potentially improving AVD management.
双层频谱计算机断层扫描(CT)参数识别主动脉瓣疾病患者严重主动脉反流。
目的:探讨双层计算机断层扫描(dct)对主动脉瓣病变(AVD)患者重度主动脉瓣反流(sAR)的诊断价值。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括53例AVD患者,他们在一周内接受了经胸超声心动图(TTE)和dct检查。根据TTE结果将患者分为sAR (n = 16)和非严重AR (non-sAR, n = 37)组。分析dct参数,包括主动脉环尺寸(最大/最小直径、周长、面积)、Valsalva窦(SOV)直径、升主动脉直径(AoD)、心肌细胞外体积(ECV)分数。采用Logistic回归分析确定AVD患者sAR的危险因素,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价dct参数的诊断效能。结果:与非sAR组相比,sAR患者明显更年轻,主动脉瓣参数更大。sAR组CT-ECV(33.19±3.86% vs 29.05±4.58%,P< 0.05)明显高于sAR组。Logistic回归分析发现,CT-ECV和SOV直径是sAR的独立预测因子(CT-ECV: OR= 1.531, 95% CI: 1.133-2.070, P= 0.006; SOV直径:OR= 1.198, 95% CI: 1.056-1.359, P= 0.005)。这两个参数都能有效区分sAR和非sAR患者。他们的联合模型提高了诊断性能(AUC = 0.867),并在轻中度AR (mAR)亚组中保持了良好的准确性(AUC = 0.819)。结论:dlct衍生的CT-ECV和主动脉瓣参数可有效识别AVD患者的sAR。CT-ECV和SOV直径的结合提供了最高的诊断准确性,有可能改善AVD的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信