Classification of magnetoencephalographic independent components in epilepsy by machine learning

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aurore Semeux-Bernier , Francesca Bonini , Samuel Medina Villalon , Maria Fratello , Matthieu Kowalski , Jean-Michel Badier , Frédéric Richard , Christian-George Bénar
{"title":"Classification of magnetoencephalographic independent components in epilepsy by machine learning","authors":"Aurore Semeux-Bernier ,&nbsp;Francesca Bonini ,&nbsp;Samuel Medina Villalon ,&nbsp;Maria Fratello ,&nbsp;Matthieu Kowalski ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Badier ,&nbsp;Frédéric Richard ,&nbsp;Christian-George Bénar","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides valuable information for the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but analysis is time-consuming and subjective. Our objective was to combine Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and machine learning to ease interpretation of MEG signals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recorded 41 patients. Machine learning models were trained to classify independent components based on a set of 61 predefined features. In a first model, based on random forest (RF), we classified artifact components versus all others. In a second model, based on RF and logistic regression, we classified 4 classes (heart, noise, epileptic, physiological (i.e. normal brain activity)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With the first model <del>1</del>, we obtained F1-score and balanced accuracy above 0.9. With the second model, balanced accuracy was above 0.8. Classification of epileptic component was above chance level, but with a moderate F1 score around 0.5 – with large variability across patients. Our analysis highlighted features based on spectrum, dipolarity, connectivity, kurtosis, regularity, as well as difficulties regarding spike detection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Artifact classification can be performed efficiently with a combination of ICA and random forest. Distinguishing epileptic from physiological activity is more difficult, although some features show promise as biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our study demonstrates both the potential and the technical limitations of ICA classification of epileptic and artifactual components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 2111377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725012295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides valuable information for the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but analysis is time-consuming and subjective. Our objective was to combine Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and machine learning to ease interpretation of MEG signals.

Methods

We recorded 41 patients. Machine learning models were trained to classify independent components based on a set of 61 predefined features. In a first model, based on random forest (RF), we classified artifact components versus all others. In a second model, based on RF and logistic regression, we classified 4 classes (heart, noise, epileptic, physiological (i.e. normal brain activity)).

Results

With the first model 1, we obtained F1-score and balanced accuracy above 0.9. With the second model, balanced accuracy was above 0.8. Classification of epileptic component was above chance level, but with a moderate F1 score around 0.5 – with large variability across patients. Our analysis highlighted features based on spectrum, dipolarity, connectivity, kurtosis, regularity, as well as difficulties regarding spike detection.

Conclusion

Artifact classification can be performed efficiently with a combination of ICA and random forest. Distinguishing epileptic from physiological activity is more difficult, although some features show promise as biomarkers.

Significance

Our study demonstrates both the potential and the technical limitations of ICA classification of epileptic and artifactual components.
机器学习对癫痫脑磁图独立成分的分类。
目的:脑磁图(MEG)为耐药局灶性癫痫患者的术前评估提供了有价值的信息,但分析耗时且主观。我们的目标是结合独立成分分析(ICA)和机器学习来简化脑磁图信号的解释。方法:对41例患者进行分析。机器学习模型被训练成基于61个预定义特征集对独立组件进行分类。在第一个模型中,基于随机森林(RF),我们将工件组件与所有其他组件进行分类。在第二个模型中,基于RF和逻辑回归,我们将4类(心脏、噪音、癫痫、生理(即正常的大脑活动))分类。结果:使用第一个模型1,我们获得了f1分,平衡精度在0.9以上。第二种模型的平衡精度在0.8以上。癫痫成分的分类高于偶然水平,但有中等F1评分约0.5 -在患者之间有很大的差异。我们的分析强调了基于频谱、双极性、连通性、峰度、规律性以及尖峰检测困难的特征。结论:ICA与随机森林相结合可以有效地进行伪迹分类。区分癫痫与生理活动更为困难,尽管一些特征有望作为生物标志物。意义:我们的研究显示了ICA对癫痫和人工成分分类的潜力和技术局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信