Short-duration, low-level subclinical primary blast induces neurovascular compromise, and increased MMP9 expression.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Eugene Park, Dave V Ritzel, Elaine Liu, Andrew J Baker
{"title":"Short-duration, low-level subclinical primary blast induces neurovascular compromise, and increased MMP9 expression.","authors":"Eugene Park, Dave V Ritzel, Elaine Liu, Andrew J Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preclinical blast studies to date have demonstrated pathological changes to brain tissue over a range of overpressures and duration of exposure. While there is evidence of vascular leakage in some reports, there are few reports examining low-intensity, short-duration primary blast in the sub-millisecond range. Specifically, subclinical blast has received little scrutiny in blast models but remains an important aspect of wartime blast exposure. Low-level, shot-duration blasts have important implications regarding the scaling of blast exposure in small animal test subjects as well as understanding the effects of short duration shockwaves from small arms fire and military training with munitions. Here we employed the use of a previously characterized model of subclinical low-level primary blast with sub-millisecond duration overpressure. We used a CFD model to characterize the turbulent flow effects in our experimental model and to confirm that these effects on the target were minimal. There was good correlation between predicted and experimental pressure values. We examined neurovascular outcomes in subclinical blast at < 12 k Pa overpressure and sub-millisecond duration. Short duration subclinical blast resulted in a significant loss of perivascular S100β expression compared to controls. Evidence of neurovascular disruption was demonstrated by sodium fluorescein leakage as well as increased expression of MMP9 and VEGF. While animal studies have not focused on blast duration and intensity in this putatively subclinical range, our results taken collectively demonstrate that the microvasculature of the brain is indeed vulnerable to these doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"149997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preclinical blast studies to date have demonstrated pathological changes to brain tissue over a range of overpressures and duration of exposure. While there is evidence of vascular leakage in some reports, there are few reports examining low-intensity, short-duration primary blast in the sub-millisecond range. Specifically, subclinical blast has received little scrutiny in blast models but remains an important aspect of wartime blast exposure. Low-level, shot-duration blasts have important implications regarding the scaling of blast exposure in small animal test subjects as well as understanding the effects of short duration shockwaves from small arms fire and military training with munitions. Here we employed the use of a previously characterized model of subclinical low-level primary blast with sub-millisecond duration overpressure. We used a CFD model to characterize the turbulent flow effects in our experimental model and to confirm that these effects on the target were minimal. There was good correlation between predicted and experimental pressure values. We examined neurovascular outcomes in subclinical blast at < 12 k Pa overpressure and sub-millisecond duration. Short duration subclinical blast resulted in a significant loss of perivascular S100β expression compared to controls. Evidence of neurovascular disruption was demonstrated by sodium fluorescein leakage as well as increased expression of MMP9 and VEGF. While animal studies have not focused on blast duration and intensity in this putatively subclinical range, our results taken collectively demonstrate that the microvasculature of the brain is indeed vulnerable to these doses.

短时间、低水平亚临床原发性爆炸诱导神经血管损伤,增加MMP9表达。
迄今为止的临床前爆炸研究表明,在一定范围的超压和暴露时间内,脑组织会发生病理变化。虽然在一些报道中有血管渗漏的证据,但很少有报道检查亚毫秒范围内低强度、短时间的初爆。具体来说,亚临床爆炸在爆炸模型中很少受到审查,但仍然是战时爆炸暴露的重要方面。低水平、短时间的爆炸对小动物试验对象的爆炸暴露规模以及理解小武器射击和弹药军事训练产生的短时间冲击波的影响具有重要意义。在这里,我们采用了先前表征的亚临床低水平初爆与亚毫秒持续超压的模型。我们使用CFD模型来表征实验模型中的湍流效应,并确认这些对目标的影响是最小的。预测压力值与实验压力值具有良好的相关性。我们检查了亚临床爆炸的神经血管结局
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信