Quantitative Analysis of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA Using Standard Curve Method.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Lihuang Guo, Hanying Dai, Jiancheng Li, Chenwei Li, Yue Huang, Keqian Xu
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA Using Standard Curve Method.","authors":"Lihuang Guo, Hanying Dai, Jiancheng Li, Chenwei Li, Yue Huang, Keqian Xu","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal and dangerous type of lesions with significant implications for both cellular function and organismal health. The number of DSBs (N<sub>DSBs</sub>) across the genome reflects DNA damage severity. However, current quantification methods mainly rely on next-generation sequencing, which is laborious and expensive. This study aims to provide a simple, low-cost, and high-throughput standard curve-based method for quantifying genome-wide DSBs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Genomic DNA from human, mouse, Arabidopsis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Escherichia coli was digested by seven blunt-end restriction enzymes to generate DSB standards. Theoretical N<sub>DSBs</sub> for each standard were calculated based on restriction site frequency. Ligation-mediated quantitative PCR (LM-qPCR) was performed to obtain the Ct values, which were plotted against log-transformed N<sub>DSBs</sub> to construct standard curves. Method reliability was assessed by comparing results with neutral single-cell gel electrophoresis and γ-H2AX flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All genomes were successfully digested by seven blunt-end restriction enzymes to produce standard DSB fragments. Standard curves demonstrated high linearity (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.95), with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 1.101% and 2.528%, respectively. The detection limit was below 100 DSBs. Quantification results strongly correlated with traditional DSB detection methods (|r| > 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This standard curve-based method enables accurate, reproducible quantification of genome-wide DSBs in various organisms. It is simple, low-cost, and easily standardized, offering a promising tool for applications in genotoxicity testing, environmental exposure monitoring, and DNA damage research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e70123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal and dangerous type of lesions with significant implications for both cellular function and organismal health. The number of DSBs (NDSBs) across the genome reflects DNA damage severity. However, current quantification methods mainly rely on next-generation sequencing, which is laborious and expensive. This study aims to provide a simple, low-cost, and high-throughput standard curve-based method for quantifying genome-wide DSBs.

Method: Genomic DNA from human, mouse, Arabidopsis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Escherichia coli was digested by seven blunt-end restriction enzymes to generate DSB standards. Theoretical NDSBs for each standard were calculated based on restriction site frequency. Ligation-mediated quantitative PCR (LM-qPCR) was performed to obtain the Ct values, which were plotted against log-transformed NDSBs to construct standard curves. Method reliability was assessed by comparing results with neutral single-cell gel electrophoresis and γ-H2AX flow cytometry.

Results: All genomes were successfully digested by seven blunt-end restriction enzymes to produce standard DSB fragments. Standard curves demonstrated high linearity (R2 > 0.95), with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 1.101% and 2.528%, respectively. The detection limit was below 100 DSBs. Quantification results strongly correlated with traditional DSB detection methods (|r| > 0.9).

Conclusion: This standard curve-based method enables accurate, reproducible quantification of genome-wide DSBs in various organisms. It is simple, low-cost, and easily standardized, offering a promising tool for applications in genotoxicity testing, environmental exposure monitoring, and DNA damage research.

用标准曲线法定量分析基因组DNA双链断裂。
背景:DNA双链断裂(DSBs)是最致命和危险的病变类型,对细胞功能和机体健康都有重要影响。基因组中dsb (ndsb)的数量反映了DNA损伤的严重程度。然而,目前的定量方法主要依赖于下一代测序,该方法既费力又昂贵。本研究旨在提供一种简单、低成本、高通量的基于标准曲线的全基因组dsb定量方法。方法:用7种钝端限制性内切酶酶切人、小鼠、拟南芥、酿酒酵母和大肠杆菌基因组DNA,制备DSB标准品。每个标准的理论ndsb是基于限制场址频率计算的。采用连接介导的定量PCR (LM-qPCR)获得Ct值,并将其与对数变换的ndsb进行绘图以构建标准曲线。通过与中性单细胞凝胶电泳和γ-H2AX流式细胞术结果的比较,评估方法的可靠性。结果:所有基因组经7种钝端限制性内切酶成功酶切得到标准的DSB片段。标准曲线线性度高(R2 > 0.95),组内和组间变异系数分别为1.101%和2.528%。检出限在100 DSBs以下。定量结果与传统DSB检测方法相关性强(|r| > 0.9)。结论:这种基于标准曲线的方法能够准确、可重复地定量测定各种生物的全基因组dsb。它简单,低成本,易于标准化,为基因毒性测试,环境暴露监测和DNA损伤研究提供了一个有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信