A large-sample (N = 49,109) network analysis of depressive symptoms in children from single-parent and two-parent families.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Yujia Liao, Xiangyu Deng, Jie Gong, Yao Peng, Xianyong An, Qianyu Zhang, Xuerong Liu, Xiaobing Tian
{"title":"A large-sample (N = 49,109) network analysis of depressive symptoms in children from single-parent and two-parent families.","authors":"Yujia Liao, Xiangyu Deng, Jie Gong, Yao Peng, Xianyong An, Qianyu Zhang, Xuerong Liu, Xiaobing Tian","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07435-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the number of single-parent families continues to rise, concerns about the mental health of children in these families have grown. Network theory offers a novel approach to understanding and intervening in cases of depression by examining the interconnections among depressive symptoms. This study aims to explore the differences in depressive symptom networks between children from two-parent and single-parent families at the symptom level using network analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from September to October 2022 in Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China. The survey data were collected from 49,109 upper elementary school students as part of a universal screening program. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Using the NetworkComparisonTest (NCT), the CES-D networks were compared between children from two-parent and single-parent families, as well as between single-father and single-mother families.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the depression symptom networks of children from two-parent and single-parent families, Sad (Strength = 1.10) was the most central symptom in two-parent family networks, whereas Not enjoying life (Strength = 1.20) was the most central symptom in single-parent families. Network connections were denser in single-parent families than in two-parent families (global strength: S = 8.50 vs. 8.11, p = 0.02). Restless sleep had higher strength centrality in single-parent families than in two-parent families (strength difference = 0.12, p.<sub>adjust</sub> = 0.01). However, global strength and structure did not differ between single-father and single-mother networks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide deeper insights into the structure of depressive symptoms among children from single-parent families. Targeting central symptoms in interventions may offer new strategies for preventing depression in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07435-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the number of single-parent families continues to rise, concerns about the mental health of children in these families have grown. Network theory offers a novel approach to understanding and intervening in cases of depression by examining the interconnections among depressive symptoms. This study aims to explore the differences in depressive symptom networks between children from two-parent and single-parent families at the symptom level using network analysis.

Methods: This study was conducted from September to October 2022 in Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China. The survey data were collected from 49,109 upper elementary school students as part of a universal screening program. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Using the NetworkComparisonTest (NCT), the CES-D networks were compared between children from two-parent and single-parent families, as well as between single-father and single-mother families.

Results: In the depression symptom networks of children from two-parent and single-parent families, Sad (Strength = 1.10) was the most central symptom in two-parent family networks, whereas Not enjoying life (Strength = 1.20) was the most central symptom in single-parent families. Network connections were denser in single-parent families than in two-parent families (global strength: S = 8.50 vs. 8.11, p = 0.02). Restless sleep had higher strength centrality in single-parent families than in two-parent families (strength difference = 0.12, p.adjust = 0.01). However, global strength and structure did not differ between single-father and single-mother networks.

Conclusion: These findings provide deeper insights into the structure of depressive symptoms among children from single-parent families. Targeting central symptoms in interventions may offer new strategies for preventing depression in this population.

单亲和双亲家庭儿童抑郁症状的大样本(N = 49,109)网络分析
背景:随着单亲家庭数量的不断增加,人们对这些家庭中儿童心理健康的担忧也在增加。网络理论通过研究抑郁症状之间的相互联系,为理解和干预抑郁症提供了一种新的方法。本研究旨在运用网络分析法,探讨双亲与单亲家庭儿童抑郁症状网络在症状水平上的差异。方法:本研究于2022年9 - 10月在中国四川省南充市进行。作为一项普遍筛查计划的一部分,调查数据来自49109名小学高年级学生。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)评估抑郁症状。使用网络比较测试(NCT),比较了双亲和单亲家庭以及单亲父亲和单亲母亲家庭儿童的CES-D网络。结果:在双亲和单亲家庭儿童抑郁症状网络中,单亲家庭儿童抑郁症状网络以悲伤(强度= 1.10)为中心症状,单亲家庭儿童抑郁症状网络以不享受生活(强度= 1.20)为中心症状。单亲家庭的网络连接密度高于双亲家庭(全球强度:S = 8.50 vs. 8.11, p = 0.02)。单亲家庭不安宁睡眠的强度中心性高于双亲家庭(强度差= 0.12,p.adjust = 0.01)。然而,单亲父亲和单亲母亲网络的全球强度和结构并没有不同。结论:这些发现为单亲家庭儿童抑郁症状的结构提供了更深入的见解。针对中心症状的干预措施可能为预防这一人群的抑郁症提供新的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信