Anna J Kobzeva-Herzog, Sarvesh Palaniappan, Yilan Jiangliu, Emma Kraus, Heba Elassar, Andrea Merrill, Lauren Oshry, Jose Acevedo, Naomi Ko, Michael R Cassidy
{"title":"A Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Clinic Improves Time to Treatment at an Urban, Safety Net Hospital.","authors":"Anna J Kobzeva-Herzog, Sarvesh Palaniappan, Yilan Jiangliu, Emma Kraus, Heba Elassar, Andrea Merrill, Lauren Oshry, Jose Acevedo, Naomi Ko, Michael R Cassidy","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18497-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomically vulnerable patients experience significant breast cancer care treatment disparities. Our aim was to examine how multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic (MBCC) implementation affected time to treatment at a safety net hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of female patients (≥18 years) with new breast cancer diagnoses from January 2019-September 2022. Time to treatment from biopsy-confirmed diagnosis was compared between patients seen in MBCC and those in a traditional discipline-based serial episodic clinic model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 734 patients (mean age 58.5 years), 45.8% identified as Black and 48.4% were insured by Medicaid. MBCC patients (28.9%) were younger (55.7 vs. 59.6 years, P<0.001), less likely to be Hispanic (18.4% vs. 27.6%, P=0.01), more likely to have invasive cancer (86.8% vs. 60.3%, P<0.001), had shorter time to treatment (35.0 vs. 46.9 days, P<0.001), and were more likely to receive chemotherapy first (48.6% vs. 11.5%, P<0.001) compared to non-MBCC patients. In patients who received chemotherapy first, MBCC was associated with reduced time to initial appointment (10.2 vs. 18.1 days, P=0.011) and treatment initiation (27.1 vs. 42.6 days, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed invasive histology was associated with MBCC participation (OR 4.29, P<0.0001), while Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.55, P=0.014) and older age (OR 0.98, P=0.021) were less associated with MBCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a MBCC in a safety net hospital improved time to initial breast cancer treatment for vulnerable patients. Moving forward, MBCC can serve as a model to reduce disparities in vulnerable patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18497-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomically vulnerable patients experience significant breast cancer care treatment disparities. Our aim was to examine how multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic (MBCC) implementation affected time to treatment at a safety net hospital.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of female patients (≥18 years) with new breast cancer diagnoses from January 2019-September 2022. Time to treatment from biopsy-confirmed diagnosis was compared between patients seen in MBCC and those in a traditional discipline-based serial episodic clinic model.
Results: Among 734 patients (mean age 58.5 years), 45.8% identified as Black and 48.4% were insured by Medicaid. MBCC patients (28.9%) were younger (55.7 vs. 59.6 years, P<0.001), less likely to be Hispanic (18.4% vs. 27.6%, P=0.01), more likely to have invasive cancer (86.8% vs. 60.3%, P<0.001), had shorter time to treatment (35.0 vs. 46.9 days, P<0.001), and were more likely to receive chemotherapy first (48.6% vs. 11.5%, P<0.001) compared to non-MBCC patients. In patients who received chemotherapy first, MBCC was associated with reduced time to initial appointment (10.2 vs. 18.1 days, P=0.011) and treatment initiation (27.1 vs. 42.6 days, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed invasive histology was associated with MBCC participation (OR 4.29, P<0.0001), while Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.55, P=0.014) and older age (OR 0.98, P=0.021) were less associated with MBCC.
Conclusions: Implementation of a MBCC in a safety net hospital improved time to initial breast cancer treatment for vulnerable patients. Moving forward, MBCC can serve as a model to reduce disparities in vulnerable patient populations.
背景:社会经济弱势患者经历显著的乳腺癌护理治疗差异。我们的目的是研究多学科乳腺癌诊所(MBCC)的实施如何影响安全网医院的治疗时间。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2019年1月至2022年9月期间新诊断为乳腺癌的女性患者(≥18岁)。比较了MBCC患者和传统的基于学科的系列发作性临床模型患者从活检确诊到治疗的时间。结果:734例患者(平均年龄58.5岁)中,45.8%为黑人,48.4%为医疗补助。MBCC患者(28.9%)较年轻(55.7 vs 59.6岁)。结论:在安全网医院实施MBCC可缩短易感患者的乳腺癌初始治疗时间。展望未来,MBCC可以作为减少弱势患者群体差异的典范。
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.