The main causes of the variation in the soil aggregate proportion and stability along gradient of natural forests in the outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Gabriela Tomášová , Pavel Samec , Lenka Pavlů , Ladislav Holík
{"title":"The main causes of the variation in the soil aggregate proportion and stability along gradient of natural forests in the outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic","authors":"Gabriela Tomášová ,&nbsp;Pavel Samec ,&nbsp;Lenka Pavlů ,&nbsp;Ladislav Holík","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In soils, the proportion and stability of aggregates tends to differ with local relief and/or plant cover. In this study, we assess the dependence of forest soil aggregation on physical, physicochemical and (bio)chemical properties in a) topsoil and subsurface horizons, and b) between reference soil groups, altitudes and natural vegetation, in the Outer Western Carpathians (Czech Republic). Relationships between soil properties were modelled using multiple logistic regression, while impacts of habitat divisions were assessed through discriminant analysis. Overall, soil properties impacted aggregate stability indices more (R<sup>2</sup> 0.40–0.57) than aggregate proportion (R<sup>2</sup> 0.12–0.58) with diameter &lt; 3 mm. Aggregate stability in topsoil was mainly influenced by clay content, total organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, base saturation and activity of the enzymes acid phosphomonoesterase and urease. In deeper horizons, the influence of biogenic activity was reduced, with aggregation controlled mainly by sorption processes such as pH, base saturation and catalase activity. Bulk density was most affected by biogenic components in topsoil, which indirectly influenced porosity, total organic carbon and acid phosphomonoesterase activity. Water-holding capacity and porosity, closely linked to aggregate structure, better predicted macroaggregation than microaggregation. Thus, in natural forests, soil aggregation is most correlated with distribution of soil properties. Aggregate proportion differed markedly between broadleaved and coniferous forests, while aggregate stability differed most between marginal forest-steppe conditions and temperate forests from floodplains to mountains. Importantly, the results strongly support the main hypothesis that vegetation (forest community) has a stronger influence on soil aggregation than natural factors such as soil type or altitude. In contrast, presence of natural forest accounted for 59.9–71.9 % of soil aggregate proportion (SAP) in topsoil or subsurface horizons, and 54.0–75.0 % of aggregate stability (AS), Altitude affected 63.3–85.4 % of SAP and 53.9–64.6 % of AS, and soil group 57.3–81.3 % of SAP and 51.8–71.3 % of AS. These patterns reflect strong ecosystem gradients, with mixed and broadleaved forests supporting deeper, more stable aggregation than coniferous or marginal forest-steppe. Our findings highlight the fact that soil microbial activity and enzymatic functions, enhanced by species-rich vegetation, are the drivers of carbon sequestration and soil structure resilience, and that mixed forests promote aggregation across horizons, increasing carbon retention and ecosystem adaptability under changing habitat conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 117543"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In soils, the proportion and stability of aggregates tends to differ with local relief and/or plant cover. In this study, we assess the dependence of forest soil aggregation on physical, physicochemical and (bio)chemical properties in a) topsoil and subsurface horizons, and b) between reference soil groups, altitudes and natural vegetation, in the Outer Western Carpathians (Czech Republic). Relationships between soil properties were modelled using multiple logistic regression, while impacts of habitat divisions were assessed through discriminant analysis. Overall, soil properties impacted aggregate stability indices more (R2 0.40–0.57) than aggregate proportion (R2 0.12–0.58) with diameter < 3 mm. Aggregate stability in topsoil was mainly influenced by clay content, total organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, base saturation and activity of the enzymes acid phosphomonoesterase and urease. In deeper horizons, the influence of biogenic activity was reduced, with aggregation controlled mainly by sorption processes such as pH, base saturation and catalase activity. Bulk density was most affected by biogenic components in topsoil, which indirectly influenced porosity, total organic carbon and acid phosphomonoesterase activity. Water-holding capacity and porosity, closely linked to aggregate structure, better predicted macroaggregation than microaggregation. Thus, in natural forests, soil aggregation is most correlated with distribution of soil properties. Aggregate proportion differed markedly between broadleaved and coniferous forests, while aggregate stability differed most between marginal forest-steppe conditions and temperate forests from floodplains to mountains. Importantly, the results strongly support the main hypothesis that vegetation (forest community) has a stronger influence on soil aggregation than natural factors such as soil type or altitude. In contrast, presence of natural forest accounted for 59.9–71.9 % of soil aggregate proportion (SAP) in topsoil or subsurface horizons, and 54.0–75.0 % of aggregate stability (AS), Altitude affected 63.3–85.4 % of SAP and 53.9–64.6 % of AS, and soil group 57.3–81.3 % of SAP and 51.8–71.3 % of AS. These patterns reflect strong ecosystem gradients, with mixed and broadleaved forests supporting deeper, more stable aggregation than coniferous or marginal forest-steppe. Our findings highlight the fact that soil microbial activity and enzymatic functions, enhanced by species-rich vegetation, are the drivers of carbon sequestration and soil structure resilience, and that mixed forests promote aggregation across horizons, increasing carbon retention and ecosystem adaptability under changing habitat conditions.
捷克西部喀尔巴阡山脉外缘天然林土壤团聚体比例及梯度稳定性变化的主要原因
在土壤中,团聚体的比例和稳定性往往因当地地形和/或植物覆盖而异。在这项研究中,我们评估了森林土壤团聚体对物理、物理化学和(生物)化学性质的依赖,在表层土壤和地下层,以及b)参考土壤组、海拔和自然植被之间。采用多元逻辑回归对土壤性质之间的关系进行建模,并通过判别分析评估生境划分的影响。总体而言,土壤性质对骨料稳定性指标的影响(R2 0.40 ~ 0.57)大于骨料比例(R2 0.12 ~ 0.58)。表层土壤团聚体稳定性主要受粘土含量、总有机碳、微生物生物量碳、碱饱和度以及酸性磷单酯酶和脲酶活性的影响。在较深的层位,生物活性的影响减弱,聚集主要受pH、碱饱和度和过氧化氢酶活性等吸附过程的控制。土壤容重受表层土壤生物成分的影响最大,其间接影响孔隙度、总有机碳和酸性磷酸单酯酶活性。持水量和孔隙度与团聚体结构密切相关,能较好地预测大团聚体而非微团聚体。因此,在天然林中,土壤团聚体与土壤性质的分布最相关。阔叶林和针叶林的骨料比例差异显著,而从洪泛平原到山地的边缘森林-草原和温带森林骨料稳定性差异最大。重要的是,研究结果有力地支持了植被(森林群落)对土壤团聚体的影响强于土壤类型或海拔等自然因素的主要假设。相比之下,天然林的存在对表层土壤和地下土壤团聚体比例(SAP)的影响为59.9% ~ 71.9%,对团聚体稳定性(AS)的影响为54.0% ~ 75.0%,海拔对SAP的影响为63.3% ~ 85.4%,对AS的影响为53.9 ~ 64.6%,土壤组对SAP的影响为57.3 ~ 81.3%,对AS的影响为51.8 ~ 71.3%。这些模式反映了强大的生态系统梯度,与针叶林或边缘森林草原相比,混交林和阔叶林支持更深、更稳定的聚集。我们的研究结果强调了这样一个事实,即丰富物种的植被增强了土壤微生物活性和酶功能,是碳固存和土壤结构弹性的驱动因素,并且混交林促进了跨层聚集,增加了碳保留和生态系统在不断变化的栖息地条件下的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信