Carmen Sayon-Orea , Andrea Romanos-Nanclares , Vanessa Bullón-Vela , Ignacio Chiva-San Roman , Benedita Caiado , Maria Ondarra-Erdozain , Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez , Miguel A. Martínez-González
{"title":"Effect of duration of hormonal contraceptive use on breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies","authors":"Carmen Sayon-Orea , Andrea Romanos-Nanclares , Vanessa Bullón-Vela , Ignacio Chiva-San Roman , Benedita Caiado , Maria Ondarra-Erdozain , Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez , Miguel A. Martínez-González","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prospective evidence for the association between use of hormonal contraceptives for 5 years or more and the subsequent incidence of breast cancer. We systematically searched all cohort studies published in English, Spanish, Italian, French, or Portuguese on PubMed or Web of Science up to September 8, 2025. We used Covidence software to manage most review activities. We extracted relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios from each individual study to generate pooled results using a random-effects meta-analysis, and a dose–response meta-analysis to calculate relative risks and their 95 % confidence intervals for each additional year of use of hormonal contraceptives. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess the quality of included studies. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Twenty independent cohorts and 23 reports with a total of 5,572,683 women and 72,350 incident cases of breast cancer were included in the systematic review, while 3,920,319 women with 68,508 incident cases were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled adjusted relative risk for the association between hormonal contraceptive use for 5 years or more and breast cancer risk was 1.20 (95 % confidence interval, 1.09–1.32) compared with never users. Further meta-analyses on the dose–response relationship showed a nonlinear association, with risk progressively increasing during the first 5 years of use, after which the risk remained stable until the 10th year, when it increased again. This meta-analysis provides evidence of a detrimental association between duration of exposure to oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51120,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 108750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512225005584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prospective evidence for the association between use of hormonal contraceptives for 5 years or more and the subsequent incidence of breast cancer. We systematically searched all cohort studies published in English, Spanish, Italian, French, or Portuguese on PubMed or Web of Science up to September 8, 2025. We used Covidence software to manage most review activities. We extracted relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios from each individual study to generate pooled results using a random-effects meta-analysis, and a dose–response meta-analysis to calculate relative risks and their 95 % confidence intervals for each additional year of use of hormonal contraceptives. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess the quality of included studies. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Twenty independent cohorts and 23 reports with a total of 5,572,683 women and 72,350 incident cases of breast cancer were included in the systematic review, while 3,920,319 women with 68,508 incident cases were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled adjusted relative risk for the association between hormonal contraceptive use for 5 years or more and breast cancer risk was 1.20 (95 % confidence interval, 1.09–1.32) compared with never users. Further meta-analyses on the dose–response relationship showed a nonlinear association, with risk progressively increasing during the first 5 years of use, after which the risk remained stable until the 10th year, when it increased again. This meta-analysis provides evidence of a detrimental association between duration of exposure to oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk.
我们对使用激素避孕药5年或5年以上与随后乳腺癌发病率之间的关联的前瞻性证据进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们系统地检索了截至2025年9月8日在PubMed或Web of Science上以英语、西班牙语、意大利语、法语或葡萄牙语发表的所有队列研究。我们使用covid软件来管理大多数审查活动。我们从每个单独的研究中提取相对风险、优势比或风险比,使用随机效应荟萃分析和剂量-反应荟萃分析来计算每增加一年使用激素避孕药的相对风险及其95%置信区间,从而产生汇总结果。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估纳入研究的质量。进行了几个亚组和敏感性分析。系统评价纳入了20个独立队列和23份报告,共涉及5,572,683名女性和72,350例乳腺癌病例,而荟萃分析纳入了3,920,319名女性和68,508例乳腺癌病例。与从未使用激素避孕药者相比,使用激素避孕药5年及以上与乳腺癌风险相关的综合调整相对风险为1.20(95%可信区间,1.09-1.32)。对剂量-反应关系的进一步荟萃分析显示出一种非线性关联,在使用前5年风险逐渐增加,之后风险保持稳定,直到第10年再次增加。这项荟萃分析提供了口服避孕药暴露时间与乳腺癌风险之间存在有害关联的证据。
期刊介绍:
Maturitas is an international multidisciplinary peer reviewed scientific journal of midlife health and beyond publishing original research, reviews, consensus statements and guidelines, and mini-reviews. The journal provides a forum for all aspects of postreproductive health in both genders ranging from basic science to health and social care.
Topic areas include:• Aging• Alternative and Complementary medicines• Arthritis and Bone Health• Cancer• Cardiovascular Health• Cognitive and Physical Functioning• Epidemiology, health and social care• Gynecology/ Reproductive Endocrinology• Nutrition/ Obesity Diabetes/ Metabolic Syndrome• Menopause, Ovarian Aging• Mental Health• Pharmacology• Sexuality• Quality of Life