The association between cholesterol efflux capacity and apolipoprotein A1: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8
Linas Černiauskas, Eglė Mazgelytė, Dovilė Karčiauskaitė
{"title":"The association between cholesterol efflux capacity and apolipoprotein A1: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Linas Černiauskas, Eglė Mazgelytė, Dovilė Karčiauskaitė","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.030506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles are key participants in reverse cholesterol transport. Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) are HDL-related biomarkers often used to evaluate HDL particle functionality and quantity. This study aimed to assess the correlation between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations and explore whether methodological aspects influence the correlation results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42024552535). Three databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were screened for the studies published between January 2000 and May 2024. The correlation results were analyzed using a random-effects model, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies with 4967 participants were included. This meta-analysis's results indicated a statistically significant positive moderate strength correlation between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations. A high level of study heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. Further exploration into this heterogeneity revealed that different cell culture lines and cholesterol acceptors used to evaluate CEC impact the overall result of the pooled correlation estimate. The methods used to evaluate Apo A1 did not significantly affect the correlation estimate between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The correlation between CEC and Apo A1 lacks strength and consistency for Apo A1 being used as a surrogate marker for HDL function in a clinical setting. Currently, there is a high need for the standardization of CEC measurement methodologies that impact the overall results and comparability of the studies that have already been conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 3","pages":"030506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2025.030506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles are key participants in reverse cholesterol transport. Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) are HDL-related biomarkers often used to evaluate HDL particle functionality and quantity. This study aimed to assess the correlation between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations and explore whether methodological aspects influence the correlation results.

Materials and methods: This meta-analysis was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42024552535). Three databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were screened for the studies published between January 2000 and May 2024. The correlation results were analyzed using a random-effects model, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 19 studies with 4967 participants were included. This meta-analysis's results indicated a statistically significant positive moderate strength correlation between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations. A high level of study heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. Further exploration into this heterogeneity revealed that different cell culture lines and cholesterol acceptors used to evaluate CEC impact the overall result of the pooled correlation estimate. The methods used to evaluate Apo A1 did not significantly affect the correlation estimate between CEC and Apo A1 concentrations.

Conclusions: The correlation between CEC and Apo A1 lacks strength and consistency for Apo A1 being used as a surrogate marker for HDL function in a clinical setting. Currently, there is a high need for the standardization of CEC measurement methodologies that impact the overall results and comparability of the studies that have already been conducted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胆固醇外排能力与载脂蛋白A1之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
高密度脂蛋白(HDL)颗粒是逆向胆固醇转运的关键参与者。胆固醇外排能力(CEC)和载脂蛋白A1 (Apo A1)是HDL相关的生物标志物,常用于评价HDL颗粒的功能和数量。本研究旨在评估CEC与Apo A1浓度之间的相关性,并探讨方法学方面是否会影响相关性结果。材料和方法:本荟萃分析在PROSPERO数据库中前瞻性注册(注册号CRD42024552535)。PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library三个数据库对2000年1月至2024年5月间发表的研究进行了筛选。采用随机效应模型对相关结果进行分析,并进行敏感性和亚组分析。结果:共纳入19项研究,4967名受试者。该荟萃分析结果显示,CEC和Apo A1浓度之间存在统计学上显著的正中等强度相关性。在纳入的研究中观察到高度的研究异质性。对这种异质性的进一步探索表明,用于评估CEC的不同细胞培养系和胆固醇受体会影响汇总相关性估计的总体结果。评估Apo A1的方法对CEC和Apo A1浓度之间的相关性估计没有显著影响。结论:在临床环境中,将Apo A1作为HDL功能的替代标志物,CEC与Apo A1之间的相关性缺乏强度和一致性。目前,非常需要标准化CEC测量方法,因为这些方法会影响已经进行的研究的总体结果和可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信