Temporal Trends in Outcomes and Predictors of Length of Stay following Lung Cancer Resection over 10 Years with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lauren Kari Dixon, David Messenger, Lesley Wood, Neil Rasburn, Douglas West, Eveline Internullo, Rakesh Krishnadas, Igor Saftic, Stylianos Gaitanakis, Laura Socci, Michelle Brack, Timothy Batchelor, Natasha Joshi
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Outcomes and Predictors of Length of Stay following Lung Cancer Resection over 10 Years with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.","authors":"Lauren Kari Dixon, David Messenger, Lesley Wood, Neil Rasburn, Douglas West, Eveline Internullo, Rakesh Krishnadas, Igor Saftic, Stylianos Gaitanakis, Laura Socci, Michelle Brack, Timothy Batchelor, Natasha Joshi","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery aims to accelerate recovery, with length of stay as a key metric. This study assessed temporal trends in short-term outcomes within a maturing programme and identified factors associated with increased hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing lung cancer resection following a 14-step protocol between 2013 and 2023. Primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, morbidity, re-admission, and reoperation rates. Predictors of length of stay were analysed using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2192 patients; procedures included lobectomy (61%), wedge resection (23%), segmentectomy (10%), pneumonectomy (3.5%), and bi-lobectomy (2.7%), Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was used in 80% of cases. Median length of stay decreased from 5 to 4 days (p < 0.001), while protocol adherence increased from 10/14 to 12/14 (p = 0.01). In-hospital mortality (2.9% to 1.0%, p < 0.001) and major-morbidity (12.2% to 5.6%, p < 0.001) both declined. In multivariable linear regression, factors associated with longer stay included age (β = 0.17, CI 0.13-0.20, p < 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (β = 1.12, CI 1.04-2.2, p = 0.02), open surgery (β = 1.0, CI 0.17-2.2, p = 0.043), thoracoscopic-to-open converted surgery (β = 1.49, CI 0.96-1.9, p = 0.03) and intensive care (β = 3.4, CI 2.5-4.3, p < 0.001). Protective factors were early mobilisation (β=-0.90, CI -1.9-0.33, p = 0.005) and opioid avoidance (β=-0.72, CI -2.4-0.99, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sustained use of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme was associated with shorter hospitalisation and reduced morbidity. Factors associated with length of stay can identify patients at risk of delayed recovery and prioritise elements for optimisation within recovery pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery aims to accelerate recovery, with length of stay as a key metric. This study assessed temporal trends in short-term outcomes within a maturing programme and identified factors associated with increased hospital stay.

Methods: Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing lung cancer resection following a 14-step protocol between 2013 and 2023. Primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, morbidity, re-admission, and reoperation rates. Predictors of length of stay were analysed using linear regression.

Results: We included 2192 patients; procedures included lobectomy (61%), wedge resection (23%), segmentectomy (10%), pneumonectomy (3.5%), and bi-lobectomy (2.7%), Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was used in 80% of cases. Median length of stay decreased from 5 to 4 days (p < 0.001), while protocol adherence increased from 10/14 to 12/14 (p = 0.01). In-hospital mortality (2.9% to 1.0%, p < 0.001) and major-morbidity (12.2% to 5.6%, p < 0.001) both declined. In multivariable linear regression, factors associated with longer stay included age (β = 0.17, CI 0.13-0.20, p < 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (β = 1.12, CI 1.04-2.2, p = 0.02), open surgery (β = 1.0, CI 0.17-2.2, p = 0.043), thoracoscopic-to-open converted surgery (β = 1.49, CI 0.96-1.9, p = 0.03) and intensive care (β = 3.4, CI 2.5-4.3, p < 0.001). Protective factors were early mobilisation (β=-0.90, CI -1.9-0.33, p = 0.005) and opioid avoidance (β=-0.72, CI -2.4-0.99, p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Sustained use of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme was associated with shorter hospitalisation and reduced morbidity. Factors associated with length of stay can identify patients at risk of delayed recovery and prioritise elements for optimisation within recovery pathways.

肺癌切除术后10年内预后和住院时间预测因素的时间趋势,术后恢复增强。
目的:增强术后恢复旨在加速恢复,以住院时间为关键指标。本研究评估了一个成熟项目短期结果的时间趋势,并确定了与住院时间增加相关的因素。方法:前瞻性收集2013年至2023年期间接受14步肺癌切除术的连续患者的数据。主要观察指标为住院时间。次要结局包括30天死亡率、发病率、再入院率和再手术率。使用线性回归分析住院时间的预测因子。结果:纳入2192例患者;手术包括肺叶切除术(61%)、楔形切除术(23%)、节段切除术(10%)、全肺切除术(3.5%)和双肺叶切除术(2.7%),80%的病例采用电视胸腔镜手术。中位住院时间从5天减少到4天(p)。结论:持续使用增强术后恢复方案与缩短住院时间和降低发病率相关。与住院时间相关的因素可以识别有延迟恢复风险的患者,并在恢复途径中优先考虑优化要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信