Lu Meng, Chuang-Long Xu, Xiao-Xu He, Xiao-Chan Tan
{"title":"Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Poststroke Depression: Systematic Review.","authors":"Lu Meng, Chuang-Long Xu, Xiao-Xu He, Xiao-Chan Tan","doi":"10.2196/76577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poststroke depression (PSD) is a common complication following stroke. In recent years, several systematic reviews have evaluated the effects of moxibustion and acupuncture on PSD; however, their findings have been inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This overview of systematic reviews aimed to assess the methodological quality, reporting quality, and strength of evidence of existing systematic reviews on acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD. In addition, this study also analyzed the limitations of previous studies and suggested directions for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic reviews concerning acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD published before August 10, 2024, were identified from 8 databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Eligible studies included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing moxibustion and acupuncture for the treatment of PSD. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality were evaluated using AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), respectively. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess overlap among the included primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 studies were included. According to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 assessment, all studies were rated as having \"low\" or \"critically low\" methodological quality. Based on PRISMA, 1 study demonstrated seriously inadequate reporting quality, while 21 studies had partially inadequate reporting quality. The quality of evidence in the included reviews ranged from very low to moderate. Most of the primary outcomes exhibited mild to moderate overlap among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the included systematic reviews indicated that acupuncture may be beneficial for PSD. Nevertheless, the methodology, reporting, and evidence quality of these reviews require improvement. Stronger evidence will depend on the conduct of larger, multicenter, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials, as well as high-quality systematic reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e76577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/76577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Poststroke depression (PSD) is a common complication following stroke. In recent years, several systematic reviews have evaluated the effects of moxibustion and acupuncture on PSD; however, their findings have been inconsistent.
Objective: This overview of systematic reviews aimed to assess the methodological quality, reporting quality, and strength of evidence of existing systematic reviews on acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD. In addition, this study also analyzed the limitations of previous studies and suggested directions for future research.
Methods: Systematic reviews concerning acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD published before August 10, 2024, were identified from 8 databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Eligible studies included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing moxibustion and acupuncture for the treatment of PSD. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality were evaluated using AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), respectively. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess overlap among the included primary studies.
Results: A total of 24 studies were included. According to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 assessment, all studies were rated as having "low" or "critically low" methodological quality. Based on PRISMA, 1 study demonstrated seriously inadequate reporting quality, while 21 studies had partially inadequate reporting quality. The quality of evidence in the included reviews ranged from very low to moderate. Most of the primary outcomes exhibited mild to moderate overlap among studies.
Conclusions: Most of the included systematic reviews indicated that acupuncture may be beneficial for PSD. Nevertheless, the methodology, reporting, and evidence quality of these reviews require improvement. Stronger evidence will depend on the conduct of larger, multicenter, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials, as well as high-quality systematic reviews.
背景:卒中后抑郁(PSD)是卒中后常见的并发症。近年来,一些系统综述评估了艾灸和针灸对PSD的影响;然而,他们的发现并不一致。目的:本综述旨在评估现有针灸治疗PSD的系统综述的方法学质量、报告质量和证据强度。此外,本研究还分析了以往研究的局限性,并提出了未来研究的方向。方法:从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国知识基础设施、万方数据库、VIP数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库等8个数据库中检索2024年8月10日前发表的针灸治疗PSD的系统综述。符合条件的研究包括比较艾灸和针灸治疗PSD的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。方法质量、报告质量和证据质量分别使用AMSTAR 2(多系统评价评估-2)、PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)2020和GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)进行评估。计算校正后的覆盖面积以评估纳入的主要研究之间的重叠。结果:共纳入24项研究。根据多系统评价-2评估,所有研究的方法学质量被评为“低”或“极低”。基于PRISMA, 1项研究报告质量严重不足,21项研究报告质量部分不足。纳入的综述的证据质量从极低到中等不等。大多数主要结局在研究中表现出轻度至中度的重叠。结论:大多数纳入的系统评价表明针灸可能对PSD有益。然而,这些审查的方法、报告和证据质量需要改进。更有力的证据将取决于更大规模、多中心、严格设计的随机对照试验,以及高质量的系统评价。