An investigation into road safety performance in Chinese provincial-level administrative regions: Insights from the input-output analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Liangguo Kang
{"title":"An investigation into road safety performance in Chinese provincial-level administrative regions: Insights from the input-output analysis.","authors":"Liangguo Kang","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2563595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Road safety is a vital public concern aimed at preventing road-related injuries and fatalities. Assessing road safety status can be effectively conducted using performance measurement tools, which help identify areas for improvement and guide the development of targeted safety strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates the road safety performance of Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2020 using an undesirable data envelopment analysis model and the meta-frontier approach to measure input-output efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the three-year period, two, three, and two provinces, respectively, achieved efficiency scores considered as benchmarks. Clustering analysis grouped the performance into three tiers, with Beijing and Shanghai consistently in the highest-performing tier. Provinces in eastern China demonstrated relatively stable and high performance across all years. Meanwhile, Guangxi, Qinghai, and Guizhou showed potential for reducing undesirable output by over 80% annually. Changes in scores for 20, 19, and 20 provinces were driven by differences in production frontier technologies over time. A comparative evaluation incorporating desirable output offers an additional perspective on performance measurement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research presents a framework for assessing road safety performance using both undesirable and desirable outputs and offers insights for policymakers to understand regional safety variations under diverse economic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2563595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Road safety is a vital public concern aimed at preventing road-related injuries and fatalities. Assessing road safety status can be effectively conducted using performance measurement tools, which help identify areas for improvement and guide the development of targeted safety strategies.

Methods: This study evaluates the road safety performance of Chinese provinces from 2018 to 2020 using an undesirable data envelopment analysis model and the meta-frontier approach to measure input-output efficiency.

Results: During the three-year period, two, three, and two provinces, respectively, achieved efficiency scores considered as benchmarks. Clustering analysis grouped the performance into three tiers, with Beijing and Shanghai consistently in the highest-performing tier. Provinces in eastern China demonstrated relatively stable and high performance across all years. Meanwhile, Guangxi, Qinghai, and Guizhou showed potential for reducing undesirable output by over 80% annually. Changes in scores for 20, 19, and 20 provinces were driven by differences in production frontier technologies over time. A comparative evaluation incorporating desirable output offers an additional perspective on performance measurement.

Conclusions: This research presents a framework for assessing road safety performance using both undesirable and desirable outputs and offers insights for policymakers to understand regional safety variations under diverse economic contexts.

中国省级行政区域道路安全绩效调查:来自投入产出分析的启示。
目标:道路安全是一个重要的公众关注问题,旨在预防与道路有关的伤害和死亡。使用绩效衡量工具可以有效地评估道路安全状况,这有助于确定需要改进的领域,并指导制定有针对性的安全战略。方法:采用非期望数据包络分析模型和元前沿方法衡量投入产出效率,对2018 - 2020年中国各省道路安全绩效进行评价。结果:三年期间,分别有2个省、3个省和2个省达到了作为基准的效率得分。聚类分析将表现分为三个层次,北京和上海一直处于表现最好的层次。东部省份全年表现相对稳定、表现优异。与此同时,广西、青海和贵州显示出年减少不良产量80%以上的潜力。20、19和20个省份的得分变化是由生产前沿技术的差异所驱动的。包含理想产出的比较评价为绩效衡量提供了另一个视角。结论:本研究提出了一个评估道路安全绩效的框架,使用不希望的和理想的产出,并为政策制定者了解不同经济背景下的区域安全差异提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信