The OncoSim-Cervix cancer microsimulation model: Unveiling roll-out strategies for human papillomavirus primary testing.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Roxanne Garaszczuk, Jean Hai Ein Yong, Andrew Coldman, Rochelle Garner
{"title":"The OncoSim-Cervix cancer microsimulation model: Unveiling roll-out strategies for human papillomavirus primary testing.","authors":"Roxanne Garaszczuk, Jean Hai Ein Yong, Andrew Coldman, Rochelle Garner","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202501000002-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers, yet it is largely preventable. Switching methods for primary screening from cytology testing, via Pap test, to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a component of that prevention. OncoSim-Cervix, a Canadian cervical cancer microsimulation model, assesses the long-term effects of HPV vaccination and screening interventions. This study projects the impact of differing roll-out strategies for HPV primary testing for cervical cancer screening in Canada.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>OncoSim-Cervix simulates the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer, incorporating Canadian data on incidence, mortality, HPV vaccination, screening, and costs. This analysis compared the effect of different roll-out strategies for switching from current practice to HPV primary screening every five years. Using OncoSim-Cervix, the study simulated one status quo scenario (cytology primary screening every three years) and three quinquennial HPV primary screening scenarios: (1) one-time roll-out, (2) population-based roll-out over two years, and (3) age-based roll-out over three years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All HPV screening roll-out strategies were found to improve clinical outcomes, with reductions of approximately 20% in cervical cancer cases and 18% in deaths, while screening less frequently, compared with cytology screening. The one-time roll-out scenario initially spiked colposcopy referrals by 60%, while phased implementation produced smaller peaks (35% to 40%) followed by declining referrals, compared with cytology screening.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Switching from three-year cytology to five-year HPV testing improves outcomes, with phased strategies mitigating the initial colposcopy surge. Modelling can help programs anticipate and manage colposcopy demand during the transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"36 10","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202501000002-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers, yet it is largely preventable. Switching methods for primary screening from cytology testing, via Pap test, to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a component of that prevention. OncoSim-Cervix, a Canadian cervical cancer microsimulation model, assesses the long-term effects of HPV vaccination and screening interventions. This study projects the impact of differing roll-out strategies for HPV primary testing for cervical cancer screening in Canada.

Data and methods: OncoSim-Cervix simulates the progression from HPV infection to cervical cancer, incorporating Canadian data on incidence, mortality, HPV vaccination, screening, and costs. This analysis compared the effect of different roll-out strategies for switching from current practice to HPV primary screening every five years. Using OncoSim-Cervix, the study simulated one status quo scenario (cytology primary screening every three years) and three quinquennial HPV primary screening scenarios: (1) one-time roll-out, (2) population-based roll-out over two years, and (3) age-based roll-out over three years.

Results: All HPV screening roll-out strategies were found to improve clinical outcomes, with reductions of approximately 20% in cervical cancer cases and 18% in deaths, while screening less frequently, compared with cytology screening. The one-time roll-out scenario initially spiked colposcopy referrals by 60%, while phased implementation produced smaller peaks (35% to 40%) followed by declining referrals, compared with cytology screening.

Interpretation: Switching from three-year cytology to five-year HPV testing improves outcomes, with phased strategies mitigating the initial colposcopy surge. Modelling can help programs anticipate and manage colposcopy demand during the transition.

oncosim -子宫颈癌微观模拟模型:揭示人类乳头瘤病毒原发检测的推广策略。
背景:在全球范围内,宫颈癌是最常见的癌症之一,但它在很大程度上是可以预防的。将初级筛查方法从细胞学检测(通过巴氏涂片试验)改为人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测,是这种预防的一个组成部分。OncoSim-Cervix,加拿大宫颈癌微观模拟模型,评估HPV疫苗接种和筛查干预的长期影响。本研究预测了加拿大宫颈癌筛查中HPV初级检测的不同推广策略的影响。数据和方法:OncoSim-Cervix模拟了从HPV感染到宫颈癌的进展,结合了加拿大关于发病率、死亡率、HPV疫苗接种、筛查和成本的数据。该分析比较了从目前的做法转变为每五年一次的HPV初级筛查的不同推广策略的效果。使用OncoSim-Cervix,该研究模拟了一种现状情景(每三年进行一次细胞学初级筛查)和三种五年一次的HPV初级筛查情景:(1)一次性推广,(2)以人群为基础的两年推广,(3)以年龄为基础的三年推广。结果:发现所有HPV筛查推广策略都改善了临床结果,与细胞学筛查相比,宫颈癌病例减少了约20%,死亡人数减少了18%,而筛查频率较低。与细胞学筛查相比,一次性推广方案最初使阴道镜检查的转诊人数增加了60%,而分阶段实施产生了较小的峰值(35%至40%),随后转诊人数下降。解释:从3年细胞学检测改为5年HPV检测改善了结果,分阶段策略减轻了最初的阴道镜检查激增。建模可以帮助程序预测和管理过渡期间的阴道镜检查需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书