A lifespan perspective on daily well-being: Differences in within-person variability by well-being domains and age.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1037/pag0000942
Gabrielle N Pfund, Jonathan Rush
{"title":"A lifespan perspective on daily well-being: Differences in within-person variability by well-being domains and age.","authors":"Gabrielle N Pfund, Jonathan Rush","doi":"10.1037/pag0000942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand age-related processes tied to well-being, the current work explores how fluctuations in well-being in daily life differ based on age and various well-being domains. Additionally, this research investigates whether the magnitude of concurrent within-person changes in well-being domains varies based on age. Accordingly, the present study called upon daily diary data from two age-diverse samples: a young adult sample (<i>N</i> = 144; age: <i>M</i> = 19.56, <i>SD</i> = 2.09, range = 17-28) and older adult sample (<i>N</i> = 81; age: <i>M</i> = 69.04, SD = 9.06, range = 55-94). Mixed effect location scale models suggested that older adults on average scored higher than young adults on daily self-acceptance, engagement, sense of purpose, autonomy, competence, personal growth, relatedness, vitality, and positive affect; scored lower on negative affect; and did not score differently on life satisfaction. Meanwhile, young adults experienced more daily within-person variability in all 11 well-being domains. Finally, multigroup, multilevel structural equation models showed that, at the between-person level, negative affect was more strongly tied to other well-being domains in young adults, while positive affect and vitality were more strongly tied to other well-being domains in older adults. At the within-person level, changes in one daily well-being domain were more strongly associated with changes in another 65% of the time for young adults and 33% of the time for older adults. The present study highlights differences in daily well-being processes tied to age and the larger role that daily events and experiences may play in shaping the short-term experiences of well-being in young adults' daily lives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"268-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To better understand age-related processes tied to well-being, the current work explores how fluctuations in well-being in daily life differ based on age and various well-being domains. Additionally, this research investigates whether the magnitude of concurrent within-person changes in well-being domains varies based on age. Accordingly, the present study called upon daily diary data from two age-diverse samples: a young adult sample (N = 144; age: M = 19.56, SD = 2.09, range = 17-28) and older adult sample (N = 81; age: M = 69.04, SD = 9.06, range = 55-94). Mixed effect location scale models suggested that older adults on average scored higher than young adults on daily self-acceptance, engagement, sense of purpose, autonomy, competence, personal growth, relatedness, vitality, and positive affect; scored lower on negative affect; and did not score differently on life satisfaction. Meanwhile, young adults experienced more daily within-person variability in all 11 well-being domains. Finally, multigroup, multilevel structural equation models showed that, at the between-person level, negative affect was more strongly tied to other well-being domains in young adults, while positive affect and vitality were more strongly tied to other well-being domains in older adults. At the within-person level, changes in one daily well-being domain were more strongly associated with changes in another 65% of the time for young adults and 33% of the time for older adults. The present study highlights differences in daily well-being processes tied to age and the larger role that daily events and experiences may play in shaping the short-term experiences of well-being in young adults' daily lives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

日常幸福的生命周期视角:幸福领域和年龄的个人变异性差异。
为了更好地理解与幸福感相关的年龄相关过程,目前的工作探讨了日常生活中幸福感的波动如何根据年龄和各种幸福感领域而不同。此外,本研究还调查了幸福感领域的并发个人变化的幅度是否会因年龄而异。因此,本研究需要来自两个不同年龄的样本的日常日记数据:一个是年轻人样本(N = 144;年龄:M = 19.56, SD = 2.09,范围= 17-28),另一个是老年人样本(N = 81;年龄:M = 69.04, SD = 9.06,范围= 55-94)。混合效应位置量表模型表明,老年人在日常自我接纳、参与、目标感、自主性、能力、个人成长、相关性、活力和积极情绪方面的平均得分高于年轻人;消极情绪得分较低;在生活满意度上得分也没有差异。与此同时,年轻人在所有11个幸福领域都经历了更多的日常人际变化。最后,多组、多层次结构方程模型显示,在人与人之间的水平上,年轻人的消极情绪与其他幸福领域的关系更为密切,而老年人的积极情绪和活力与其他幸福领域的关系更为密切。在个人层面上,一个日常幸福领域的变化与另外65%的年轻人和33%的老年人的变化有着更强的联系。目前的研究强调了与年龄相关的日常幸福过程的差异,以及日常事件和经历可能在塑造年轻人日常生活中的短期幸福体验方面发挥的更大作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书