Association of allergen signatures with individualized allergic phenotypes.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Dachan Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho, Chang-Hoon Kim, Min-Seok Rha
{"title":"Association of allergen signatures with individualized allergic phenotypes.","authors":"Dachan Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho, Chang-Hoon Kim, Min-Seok Rha","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergen sensitization patterns are heterogeneous, and their clinical relevance is often obscured by extensive cross-reactivity. We applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to disentangle overlapping immunoglobulin E (IgE) signals and define clinically meaningful allergen signatures in a large Korean cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 45,065 patients who underwent multiplex allergen testing (35 inhalants and food components) between 2010 and 2025. Class-scaled specific IgE values (0-6) were factorized by NMF (k = 4). Signature weights were related to asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis using multivariable logistic regression and to peripheral eosinophil counts and total IgE using age- and sex-adjusted linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four signatures-mite, grass/weed, pet, and tree-explained 77.7 % of the variance in sensitization. The mite signature predominated (57.6 % of patients) and was strongly associated with allergic rhinitis (adjusted OR: 7.21, 95 % CI: 5.66-9.16), as well as marked increases in eosinophils and total IgE. The pet signature was the strongest predictor of asthma (OR: 8.90, 6.48-12.24). The tree signature showed the strongest association with atopic dermatitis (OR: 6.27, 3.81-10.32) and broader multisystem allergic morbidity. The grass/weed signature exhibited a biphasic age trajectory with a late-adult resurgence but had modest clinical impact. All signatures were significant and graded as determinants of blood eosinophil counts and IgE levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data-driven factorization of multiplex IgE panels yields portable allergen signatures that refine attribution of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis and link serologic patterns to systemic inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2025.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergen sensitization patterns are heterogeneous, and their clinical relevance is often obscured by extensive cross-reactivity. We applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to disentangle overlapping immunoglobulin E (IgE) signals and define clinically meaningful allergen signatures in a large Korean cohort.

Methods: We analyzed 45,065 patients who underwent multiplex allergen testing (35 inhalants and food components) between 2010 and 2025. Class-scaled specific IgE values (0-6) were factorized by NMF (k = 4). Signature weights were related to asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis using multivariable logistic regression and to peripheral eosinophil counts and total IgE using age- and sex-adjusted linear models.

Results: Four signatures-mite, grass/weed, pet, and tree-explained 77.7 % of the variance in sensitization. The mite signature predominated (57.6 % of patients) and was strongly associated with allergic rhinitis (adjusted OR: 7.21, 95 % CI: 5.66-9.16), as well as marked increases in eosinophils and total IgE. The pet signature was the strongest predictor of asthma (OR: 8.90, 6.48-12.24). The tree signature showed the strongest association with atopic dermatitis (OR: 6.27, 3.81-10.32) and broader multisystem allergic morbidity. The grass/weed signature exhibited a biphasic age trajectory with a late-adult resurgence but had modest clinical impact. All signatures were significant and graded as determinants of blood eosinophil counts and IgE levels.

Conclusions: Data-driven factorization of multiplex IgE panels yields portable allergen signatures that refine attribution of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis and link serologic patterns to systemic inflammation.

过敏原特征与个体化过敏表型的关联。
背景:过敏原致敏模式是异质的,它们的临床相关性常常被广泛的交叉反应性所掩盖。我们应用非负矩阵分解(NMF)来解开重叠的免疫球蛋白E (IgE)信号,并在一个大型韩国队列中定义有临床意义的过敏原特征。方法:我们分析了2010年至2025年间接受多重过敏原检测(35种吸入剂和食物成分)的45,065例患者。分类特异性IgE值(0-6)由NMF因子分解(k = 4)。特征权重与哮喘、变应性鼻炎和特应性皮炎相关,与外周嗜酸性粒细胞计数和总IgE相关,采用年龄和性别调整线性模型。结果:螨、草/杂草、宠物和树这四个特征解释了77.7%的致敏差异。螨特征占主导地位(57.6%的患者),与变应性鼻炎密切相关(调整后的OR: 7.21, 95% CI: 5.66-9.16),嗜酸性粒细胞和总IgE显著增加。宠物特征是哮喘的最强预测因子(OR: 8.90, 6.48-12.24)。树特征显示与特应性皮炎(OR: 6.27, 3.81-10.32)和更广泛的多系统过敏性发病率的最强关联。草/杂草特征表现出双相年龄轨迹,成年后期复苏,但临床影响不大。所有的特征都是显著的,并被分级为血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数和IgE水平的决定因素。结论:多重IgE面板的数据驱动因子分解产生便携式过敏原特征,可细化哮喘,过敏性鼻炎和特应性皮炎的归因,并将血清学模式与全身性炎症联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergology International
Allergology International ALLERGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信