Perioperative analgesia in high-risk patients, what clinicians and searchers must know? A narrative review.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Helene Beloeil, Girish P Joshi, Patricia Lavand'homme, Felicia Cox, Jennifer Summers, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Patrice Forget
{"title":"Perioperative analgesia in high-risk patients, what clinicians and searchers must know? A narrative review.","authors":"Helene Beloeil, Girish P Joshi, Patricia Lavand'homme, Felicia Cox, Jennifer Summers, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Patrice Forget","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe postoperative pain remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in high-risk patients. While risk factors for acute and chronic postoperative pain have been well characterized, effective prevention and management strategies remain suboptimal. A multidimensional understanding of pain-including biological, psychological, and social factors-is essential for improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of perioperative analgesia in high-risk patients, highlighting key considerations, illustrated by concrete examples, for clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evidence was selected from the literature, summarising the current understanding of risk factors, pathophysiology, outcome measures, and management strategies related to perioperative pain in high-risk patients. Special attention was given to patient-specific and procedure-specific approaches, multimodal analgesia, and gaps in research methodologies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>High-risk patients-such as those with preoperative pain, opioid dependence, psychological distress, or complex surgical procedures-exhibit increased vulnerability to severe postoperative pain and persistent opioid use. Pain mechanisms involve nociceptive sensitization, neuroinflammation, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, requiring tailored multimodal analgesic approaches. Standardized, multidimensional outcome measures, including patient-reported outcomes, functional recovery, and pain trajectories, are essential for evaluating analgesic efficacy. Despite advances in pain classification (e.g., ICD-11) and study designs, research remains fragmented, with high-risk patients often excluded from clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimizing perioperative pain management in high-risk patients necessitates a personalized, evidence-based approach. Improved risk stratification, multimodal treatment strategies, and innovative research designs are critical for addressing the complexities of postoperative pain. Future studies should focus on identifying effective interventions for high pain responders and integrating long-term patient-centered outcomes into perioperative pain management protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe postoperative pain remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in high-risk patients. While risk factors for acute and chronic postoperative pain have been well characterized, effective prevention and management strategies remain suboptimal. A multidimensional understanding of pain-including biological, psychological, and social factors-is essential for improving patient outcomes.

Objective: This narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of perioperative analgesia in high-risk patients, highlighting key considerations, illustrated by concrete examples, for clinicians and researchers.

Methods: Evidence was selected from the literature, summarising the current understanding of risk factors, pathophysiology, outcome measures, and management strategies related to perioperative pain in high-risk patients. Special attention was given to patient-specific and procedure-specific approaches, multimodal analgesia, and gaps in research methodologies.

Findings: High-risk patients-such as those with preoperative pain, opioid dependence, psychological distress, or complex surgical procedures-exhibit increased vulnerability to severe postoperative pain and persistent opioid use. Pain mechanisms involve nociceptive sensitization, neuroinflammation, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, requiring tailored multimodal analgesic approaches. Standardized, multidimensional outcome measures, including patient-reported outcomes, functional recovery, and pain trajectories, are essential for evaluating analgesic efficacy. Despite advances in pain classification (e.g., ICD-11) and study designs, research remains fragmented, with high-risk patients often excluded from clinical trials.

Conclusion: Optimizing perioperative pain management in high-risk patients necessitates a personalized, evidence-based approach. Improved risk stratification, multimodal treatment strategies, and innovative research designs are critical for addressing the complexities of postoperative pain. Future studies should focus on identifying effective interventions for high pain responders and integrating long-term patient-centered outcomes into perioperative pain management protocols.

高危患者围手术期镇痛,临床医生和研究者必须知道什么?叙述性评论
背景:严重的术后疼痛仍然是一个重大的临床挑战,特别是在高危患者中。虽然急性和慢性术后疼痛的危险因素已经很好地描述,但有效的预防和管理策略仍然不是最佳的。对疼痛的多维理解——包括生物、心理和社会因素——对于改善患者的治疗效果至关重要。目的:本综述旨在为临床医生和研究人员提供高危患者围手术期镇痛的最新概况,并通过具体实例强调关键注意事项。方法:从文献中选择证据,总结目前对高危患者围手术期疼痛的危险因素、病理生理学、结局指标和管理策略的认识。特别关注患者特异性和手术特异性方法,多模式镇痛以及研究方法中的差距。研究结果:高危患者,如术前疼痛、阿片类药物依赖、心理困扰或复杂手术的患者,更容易出现严重的术后疼痛和持续使用阿片类药物。疼痛机制包括痛觉致敏、神经炎症和阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏,需要量身定制的多模式镇痛方法。标准化的、多维度的结果测量,包括患者报告的结果、功能恢复和疼痛轨迹,对于评估镇痛效果至关重要。尽管在疼痛分类(如ICD-11)和研究设计方面取得了进展,但研究仍然是碎片化的,高风险患者经常被排除在临床试验之外。结论:优化高危患者围手术期疼痛管理需要个性化的循证方法。改进的风险分层、多模式治疗策略和创新的研究设计对于解决术后疼痛的复杂性至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于确定对高疼痛反应的有效干预措施,并将以患者为中心的长期结果纳入围手术期疼痛管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信