V N Priyanka, Sriranga Radhakrishna Joshi, Mohammed Sajad Musliam Veetil Asif, Shinu Shincy
{"title":"Efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus intravenous tramadol for pain management in acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"V N Priyanka, Sriranga Radhakrishna Joshi, Mohammed Sajad Musliam Veetil Asif, Shinu Shincy","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_135_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Efficient pain control is important for patients with acute pancreatitis who visit the emergency department (ED). In this randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared to intravenous tramadol was determined to provide effective pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blind randomized controlled study was conducted in the ED enrolling 18-70 years old patients with acute pancreatitis and a numerical rating scale score of > 4/10. Fifty patients were allocated to two different groups: the control group received IV tramadol (1 mg/kg every 6 h) and the ESP group received an ESP block with ropivacaine 0.375% (40 mL). Both groups received fentanyl (1 µg/kg) for rescue analgesia. Pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and rescue analgesia were assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v20, utilizing <i>t</i>-tests and Chi-squared tests where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics were similar between the ESP and control groups (age 41.56 ± 11.85 vs. 43.68 ± 11.55 years, <i>P</i> = 0.367). The ESP group had significantly lower pain scores up to 16 h (e.g. 1 h: 2.28 ± 1.08 vs. 6.12 ± 0.32; <i>P</i> < 0.001), reduced heart rate and mean atrial pressure at 1 h, and fewer patients requiring rescue analgesia (14% vs. 94%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) with lower analgesic consumption (66.14 ± 4.63 µg vs. 113.17 ± 33.24 µg; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESP block offers better pain relief and hemodynamic stability than IV tramadol in patients with acute pancreatitis, with significantly decreased opioid needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"273-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_135_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Efficient pain control is important for patients with acute pancreatitis who visit the emergency department (ED). In this randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared to intravenous tramadol was determined to provide effective pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis in the ED.
Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled study was conducted in the ED enrolling 18-70 years old patients with acute pancreatitis and a numerical rating scale score of > 4/10. Fifty patients were allocated to two different groups: the control group received IV tramadol (1 mg/kg every 6 h) and the ESP group received an ESP block with ropivacaine 0.375% (40 mL). Both groups received fentanyl (1 µg/kg) for rescue analgesia. Pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and rescue analgesia were assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v20, utilizing t-tests and Chi-squared tests where appropriate.
Results: Baseline demographics were similar between the ESP and control groups (age 41.56 ± 11.85 vs. 43.68 ± 11.55 years, P = 0.367). The ESP group had significantly lower pain scores up to 16 h (e.g. 1 h: 2.28 ± 1.08 vs. 6.12 ± 0.32; P < 0.001), reduced heart rate and mean atrial pressure at 1 h, and fewer patients requiring rescue analgesia (14% vs. 94%; P < 0.001) with lower analgesic consumption (66.14 ± 4.63 µg vs. 113.17 ± 33.24 µg; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: ESP block offers better pain relief and hemodynamic stability than IV tramadol in patients with acute pancreatitis, with significantly decreased opioid needs.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.